DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Performed by a Single Surgeon Experienced in Open Gastrectomy: Review of Initial Experience

  • Song, Jeong Ho (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Yoon Young (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • An, Ji Yeong (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Dong Wook (Biostatistics Collaboration Unit, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Hyung, Woo Jin (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Noh, Sung Hoon (Department of Surgery, Yonsei University Health System, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.06.27
  • Accepted : 2015.08.25
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: Laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) is more complicated than laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, especially during a surgeon's initial experience with the technique. In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes of and learning curve for LTG during the initial cases of a single surgeon compared with those of open total gastrectomy (OTG). Materials and Methods: Between 2009 and 2013, 134 OTG and 74 LTG procedures were performed by a single surgeon who was experienced with OTG but new to performing LTG. Clinical characteristics, operative parameters, and short-term postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. Results: Advanced gastric cancer and D2 lymph node dissection were more common in the OTG than LTG group. Although the operation time was significantly longer for LTG than for OTG ($175.7{\pm}43.1$ minutes vs. $217.5{\pm}63.4$ minutes), LTG seems to be slightly superior or similar to OTG in terms of postoperative recovery measures. The operation time moving average of 15 cases in the LTG group decreased gradually, and the curve flattened at 54 cases. The postoperative complication rate was similar for the two groups (11.9% vs. 13.5%). No anastomotic or stump leaks occurred. Conclusions: Although LTG is technically difficult and operation time is longer for surgeons experienced in open surgery, it can be performed safely, even during a surgeon's early experience with the technique. Considering the benefits of minimally invasive surgery, LTG is recommended for early gastric cancer.

Keywords

References

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015;136:E359-E386. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
  2. Chua YJ, Cunningham D. The UK NCRI MAGIC trial of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable gastric cancer: implications for clinical practice. Ann Surg Oncol 2007;14:2687-2690. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-007-9423-7
  3. Nakajima T. Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in Japan. Gastric Cancer 2002;5:1-5.
  4. Bang YJ, Kim YW, Yang HK, Chung HC, Park YK, Lee KH, et al; CLASSIC trial investigators. Adjuvant capecitabine and oxaliplatin for gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy (CLASSIC): a phase 3 open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:315-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61873-4
  5. Songun I, Putter H, Kranenbarg EM, Sasako M, van de Velde CJ. Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:439-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X
  6. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1994;4:146-148.
  7. Chen K, Xu XW, Zhang RC, Pan Y, Wu D, Mou YP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:5365-5376. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5365
  8. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc 2005;19:168-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-004-8808-y
  9. Cui M, Xing JD, Yang W, Ma YY, Yao ZD, Zhang N, et al. D2 dissection in laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:833-839. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i8.833
  10. Zhao Y, Yu P, Hao Y, Qian F, Tang B, Shi Y, et al. Comparison of outcomes for laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2011;25:2960-2966. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1652-y
  11. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report: a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg 2010;251:417-420. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b
  12. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:627-633. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551
  13. Jeong GA, Cho GS, Kim HH, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Song KY. Laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Surgery 2009;146:469-474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.03.023
  14. Lee SE, Ryu KW, Nam BH, Lee JH, Kim YW, Yu JS, et al. Technical feasibility and safety of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopyassisted distal gastrectomy. J Surg Oncol 2009;100:392-395. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21345
  15. Shinohara T, Kanaya S, Taniguchi K, Fujita T, Yanaga K, Uyama I. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer. Arch Surg 2009;144:1138-1142. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2009.223
  16. Wada N, Kurokawa Y, Takiguchi S, Takahashi T, Yamasaki M, Miyata H, et al. Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:137-140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0235-0
  17. Wang W, Li Z, Tang J, Wang M, Wang B, Xu Z. Laparoscopic versus open total gastrectomy with D2 dissection for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2013;139:1721-1734. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-013-1462-9
  18. Sakuramoto S, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Moriya H, Hirai K, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted pancreas- and spleenpreserving total gastrectomy for gastric cancer as compared with open total gastrectomy. Surg Endosc 2009;23:2416-2423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0371-0
  19. Hur H, Jeon HM, Kim W. Laparoscopic pancreas- and spleenpreserving D2 lymph node dissection in advanced (cT2) upper-third gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol 2008;97:169-172. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20927
  20. Jeong O, Ryu SY, Choi WY, Piao Z, Park YK. Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2014;21:2994-3001. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-014-3666-x
  21. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
  22. Morimoto M, Kitagami H, Hayakawa T, Tanaka M, Matsuo Y, Takeyama H. The overlap method is a safe and feasible for esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:392. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-392
  23. Zhou D, Quan Z, Wang J, Zhao M, Yang Y. Laparoscopicassisted versus open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node resection for advanced gastric cancer: effect of learning curve on short-term outcomes. a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2014;24:139-150. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2013.0481

Cited by

  1. Letter to the Editor Concerning "Short-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Total Gastrectomy Performed by a Single Surgeon Experienced in Open Gastrectomy: Review of Initial Experience" vol.16, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.2.125
  2. Reply: Factors Favorable to Reducing the Learning Curve of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer vol.16, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2016.16.2.128
  3. Impact of Centralizing Gastric Cancer Surgery on Treatment, Morbidity, and Mortality vol.21, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-017-3531-x
  4. Comparisons of short-term and survival outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted versus open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients vol.8, pp.32, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17019
  5. A comparison of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy and open total gastrectomy in early gastric cancer vol.13, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.17008
  6. Short-term surgical outcomes of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for advanced gastric cancer vol.32, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5942-x
  7. Intra-corporeal hand-sewn esophagojejunostomy is a safe and feasible procedure for totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy: short-term outcomes in 100 consecutive patients vol.32, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5964-4
  8. Laparoscopic perigastric mesogastrium excision technique for radical total gastrectomy vol.14, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5114/wiitm.2018.77874
  9. Operation time as a simple indicator to predict the overcoming of the learning curve in gastric cancer surgery: a multicenter cohort study vol.22, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00948-6
  10. Global updates in the treatment of gastric cancer: a systematic review. Part 2: perioperative management, multimodal therapies, new technologies, standardization of the surgical treatment and educatio vol.72, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-020-00771-0