DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparing Efficiencies of R&D Projects Using DEA : Focused on Industrial Technology Program

DEA를 활용한 R&D 프로젝트의 효율성 비교 : 산업기술사업을 중심으로

  • Kim, Heung-Kyu (School of Business Administration, Dankook University) ;
  • Kang, Won-Jin (Management of Technology Division, TECHNOVALUE) ;
  • Bae, Jin-Hee (Industry and Technology Policy Center, Korea Institute for Advancement of Technology)
  • 김흥규 (단국대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 강원진 (기술과가치 MoT본부) ;
  • 배진희 (한국산업기술진흥원 산업기술정책센터)
  • Received : 2015.02.02
  • Accepted : 2015.09.02
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

In this paper, scale efficiencies and relative efficiencies of R&D projects in Industrial Technology Program, sponsored by Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, Korea, are calculated and compared. For the process, various DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) models are adopted as major techniques. For DEA, two stage input oriented models are utilized for calculating the efficiencies. Next, the calculated efficiencies are grouped according to their subprograms (Industrial Material, IT Fusion, Nano Fusion, Energy Resources, and Resources Technology) and recipient types (Public Enterprise, Large Enterprise, Medium Enterprise, Small Enterprise, Lab., Univ., and etc.) respectively. Then various subprograms and recipient types are compared in terms of scale efficiencies (CCR models) and relative efficiencies (BCC models). In addition, the correlation between the 1st stage relative efficiencies and the 2nd stage relative efficiencies is calculated, from which the causal relationship between them can be inferred. Statistical analysis shows that the amount of input, in general, should increase in order to be scale efficient (CCR models) regardless of the subprograms and recipient types, that the 1st and 2nd stage relative efficiencies are different in terms of the programs and recipient types (BCC models), and that there is no significant correlation between the 1st stage relative efficiencies and the 2nd stage relative efficiencies. However, the results should be used only as reference because the goal each and every subprogram has is different and the situation each and every recipient type faces is different. In addition, the causal link between the 1st stage relative efficiencies and the 2nd relative efficiencies is not considered, which, in turn, is the limitation of this paper.

Keywords

References

  1. Banker, R., Charnes, A., and Cooper, W., Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 1984, Vol. 30, pp. 1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  2. Banker, R. and Thrall, R., Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 1992, Vol. 62, pp. 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90178-C
  3. Charnes, A., Cooper, W., and Rhodes, E., Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 1979, Vol. 2, pp. 429-444.
  4. Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., and Lovell, C.A.K., The measurements of efficiency of production. Boston, USA : Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1985.
  5. Farris, J.A., Groesbk, R.L., Aken, E.M.V., and Letens, G., Evaluating the relative performance of engineering design projects : A case study using data envelopment analysis. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 2006, Vol. 53, pp. 471-482. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2006.878100
  6. Hsu, F.M. and Hsueh, C.C., Measuring relative efficiency of Gov.-sponsored R&D projects : A three-stage approach. Evaluation and Program Planning, 2009, Vol. 32, pp. 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.10.005
  7. Hyon, M.S. and Yoo, W.J., A Study on the Technology Transfer Efficiency for Public Institutes Using DEA Model. Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2008, Vol. 31, pp. 94-103.
  8. Mendenhall, W., Wackerly, D., and Scheaffer, R., Mathematical Statistics with Applications, 4th ed. California, USA : Duxbury, 1989.
  9. Park, S.M., Two-staged DEA/AR-I Performance Evaluation Model for R&D Projects Efficiency Correlation Analysis and Programs Positioning Investigation. Journal of the Korean Academic Association of Business Administration, 2010, Vol. 23, pp. 3285-3303.
  10. Thompson, R.G., Brinkman, E.J., Dharmapala, P.S., Gonzales-Lima, M.D., and Thrall, R.M., DEA/AR profit ratios and sensitivity of 100 large U.S. banks. European Journal of Operational Research, 1986, Vol. 98, pp. 213-229.