The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three-dimensional analysis of the distal movement of maxillary 1st molars in patients fitted with mini-implant-aided trans-palatal arches

  • Miresmaeili, Amirfarhang (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Sajedi, Ahmad (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Moghimbeigi, Abbas (Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Farhadian, Nasrin (Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2014.05.12
  • Accepted : 2015.05.12
  • Published : 2015.09.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate three-dimensional molar displacement after distalization via miniscrews and a horizontal modification of the trans-palatal-arch (TPA). Methods: The subjects in this clinical trial were 26 Class II patients. After the preparation of a complete set of diagnostic records, miniscrews were inserted between the maxillary 2nd premolar and 1st molar on the palatal side. Elastic modules connected to the TPA exerting an average force of 150-200 g/side parallel to the occlusal plane were applied. Cone-beam computed tomography was utilized to evaluate the position of the miniscrews relative to the adjacent teeth and maxillary sinus, and the direction of force relative to molar furcation. The distances from the central point of the incisive papilla to the mesiopalatal cusps of the 1st maxillary molars and the distances between the mesiopalatal cusps of the left and right molars were measured to evaluate displacement of the maxillary molars on the horizontal plane. Interocclusal space was used to evaluate vertical changes. Results: Mean maxillary 1st molar distalization was $2.3{\pm}1.1mm$, at a rate of $0.4{\pm}0.2mm/month$, and rotation was not significant. Intermolar width increased by $2.9{\pm}1.8mm$. Molars were intruded relative to the neighboring teeth, from 0.1 to 0.8 mm. Conclusions: Distalization of molars was possible without extrusion, using the appliance investigated. The intrusive component of force reduced the rate of distal movement.

Keywords

References

  1. Nalcaci R, Bicakci AA, Ozan F. Noncompliance screw supported maxillary molar distalization in a parallel manner. Korean J Orthod 2010;40:250-9. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2010.40.4.250
  2. Choi YJ, Lee JS, Cha JY, Park YC. Total distalization of the maxillary arch in a patient with skeletal Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:823-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.026
  3. Choi NC, Park YC, Lee HA, Lee KJ. Treatment of Class II protrusion with severe crowding using indirect miniscrew anchorage. Angle Orthod 2007; 77:1109-18. https://doi.org/10.2319/112106-476.1
  4. Grec RH, Janson G, Branco NC, Moura-Grec PG, Patel MP, Castanha Henriques JF. Intraoral distalizer effects with conventional and skeletal anchorage: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;143:602-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.11.024
  5. Sugawara J, Kanzaki R, Takahashi I, Nagasaka H, Nanda R. Distal movement of maxillary molars in nongrowing patients with the skeletal anchorage system. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 129:723-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.08.036
  6. Kinzinger GS, Eren M, Diedrich PR. Treatment effects of intraoral appliances with conventional anchorage designs for non-compliance maxillary molar distalization: a literature review. Eur J Orthod 2008;30:558-71. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjn047
  7. Sodagar A, Ahmad Akhoundi MS, Rafighii A, Arab S. Fabrication and evaluation of a noncompliant molar distalizing appliance: bonded molar distalizer. J Dent (Tehran) 2011;8:107-16.
  8. McSherry PF, Bradley H. Class II correction-reducing patient compliance: a review of the available techniques. J Orthod 2000;27:219-25. https://doi.org/10.1179/ortho.27.3.219
  9. Mavropoulos A, Karamouzos A, Kiliaridis S, Papadopoulos MA. Efficiency of noncompliance simultaneous first and second upper molar distalization: a three-dimensional tooth movement analysis. Angle Orthod 2005;75:532-9.
  10. Gelgor IE, Buyukyilmaz T, Karaman AI, Dolanmaz D, Kalayci A. Intraosseous screw-supported upper molar distalization. Angle Orthod 2004;74:838-50.
  11. Cornelis MA, De Clerck HJ. Maxillary molar distalization with miniplates assessed on digital models: a prospective clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;132:373-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.031
  12. Gelgor IE, Karaman AI, Buyukyilmaz T. Comparison of 2 distalization systems supported by intraosseous screws. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131: 161.e1-8.
  13. Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Class II malocclusion treated with miniscrew anchorage: comparison with traditional orthodontic mechanics outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;135:302-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.03.038
  14. Park HS, Lee SK, Kwon OW. Group distal movement of teeth using microscrew implant anchorage. Angle Orthod 2005;75:602-9.
  15. Blaya MG, Blaya DS, Guimaraes MB, Hirakata LM, Marquezan M. Patient's perception on mini-screws used for molar distalization. Rev Odonto Cienc 2010;25:266-70.
  16. Park HS, Kwon TG, Sung JH. Nonextraction treatment with microscrew implants. Angle Orthod 2004; 74:539-49.
  17. Goyal A, Shivalinga B, Jyothikiran H, Patel V. Miniimplant supported molar distalization. J Dent Implant 2013;2:136-40.
  18. Villela HM, Santos Sampaio AL, Bezerra F. Use of orthodontic miniscrews in asymmetrical corrections. Dental Press J Orthod 2008;13:107-17.
  19. Kang YG, Kim JY, Nam JH. Control of maxillary dentition with 2 midpalatal orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:879-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.040
  20. Yamada K, Kuroda S, Deguchi T, Takano-Yamamoto T, Yamashiro T. Distal movement of maxillary molars using miniscrew anchorage in the buccal interradicular region. Angle Orthod 2009;79:78-84. https://doi.org/10.2319/020408-68.1
  21. Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig K. Orthodontics, current principles and techniques biomechanical considerations with temporary anchorage devices. 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby; 2012. p. 381-420.
  22. Oberti G, Villegas C, Ealo M, Palacio JC, Baccetti T. Maxillary molar distalization with the dualforce distalizer supported by mini-implants: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009; 135:282. e1-5; discussion 282-3.
  23. Almeida MA, Phillips C, Kula K, Tulloch C. Stability of the palatal rugae as landmarks for analysis of dental casts. Angle Orthod 1995;65:43-8.
  24. Kircelli BH, Pektas ZO, Kircelli C. Maxillary molar distalization with a bone-anchored pendulum appliance. Angle Orthod 2006;76:650-9.
  25. Escobar SA, Tellez PA, Moncada CA, Villegas CA, Latorre CM, Oberti G. Distalization of maxillary molars with the bone-supported pendulum: a clinical study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 131:545-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.08.012
  26. Lai EH, Yao CC, Chang JZ, Chen I, Chen YJ. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:636-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.05.017
  27. Polat-Ozsoy O, Kircelli BH, Arman-Ozcirpici A, Pektas ZO, Uckan S. Pendulum appliances with 2 anchorage designs: conventional anchorage vs bone anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008; 133:339.e9-339.e17.
  28. Sar C, Kaya B, Ozsoy O, ozcirpici AA. Comparison of two implant-supported molar distalization systems. Angle Orthod 2013;83:460-7. https://doi.org/10.2319/080512-630.1
  29. Hoggan BR, Sadowsky C. The use of palatal rugae for the assessment of anteroposterior tooth movements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119: 482-8. https://doi.org/10.1067/mod.2001.113001

Cited by

  1. Role of anatomical sites and correlated risk factors on the survival of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.19, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-018-0225-1