DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Environmental Assessments of Leachate from Medium Density Fiberboard in a Simulated Landfill

  • Lee, Min (Department of Forest Products, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Prewitt, Lynn (Department of Forest Products, Mississippi State University) ;
  • Mun, Sung Phil (Department of Wood Science & Technology, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2015.01.29
  • Accepted : 2015.03.06
  • Published : 2015.09.25

Abstract

This study investigated environmental assessments of leachate containing formaldehyde from medium density fiberboard (MDF) disposed in laboratory-scale simulated landfills. Environmental impact assessment of leachate was conducted by measuring formaldehyde, toxicity, biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), bacterial enumeration, and pH. Amount of formaldehyde in leachate from MDF in soil decreased to the level of soil only treatment by 28 days, and toxicity decreased as the amount of formaldehyde decreased. BOD and COD levels in leachate from the treatments containing MDF exceeded permissible discharge levels of BOD or COD throughout the experimental period. The pH levels of all treatment were within permissible discharge range except on day 0. Fewer bacteria were observed in leachate from MDF in soil treatment than other treatments (MDF only, cured UF resin in soil, and soil only). Consequently, the leachate from disposal of MDF in soil detrimentally affect on environment. However, soil buffered formaldehyde leaching and pH on leachate in this study. Waste MDF may be required the pre-water soaking treatment for leaching formaldehyde to reclaim on land.

Keywords

References

  1. Abu-Rukah, Y., Al-Kofahi, O. 2001. The assessment of the effect of landfill leachate on groundwater quality-a case study. El-Akader landfill site-north Jordan. Journal of Arid Environments 49(3): 615-630. https://doi.org/10.1006/jare.2001.0796
  2. American Wood Council. 2013. Environmental product declaration - Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF).
  3. Christensen, J.B., Jensen, D.L., Gron, C., Filip, Z., Christensen, T.H. 1998. Characterization of the dissolved organic carbon in landfill leachate-polluted groundwater. Water Research 32(1): 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00202-9
  4. De Rosa, E., Rubel, D., Tudino, M., Viale, A., Lombardo, R.J. 1996. The leachate composition of an old waste dump connected to groundwater: Influence of the reclamation works. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 40(3): 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00398869
  5. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). 2002. Environmental Protection Act. Standards for Effluent Discharge Regulations. General Notice No. 44. of 2003.
  6. Flyhammar, P. 1995. Leachate quality and environmental effects at active Swedish municipal landfill. In Regulations, environmental impact and aftercare. Proceedings Sardinia 95: 549-557.
  7. Jahns, T., Schepp, R., Siersdorfer, C., Kaltwasser, H. 1997. Microbial urea-formaldehyde degradation involves a new enzyme, methylenediurease. Acta Biologica Hungarica 49(2-4): 449-454.
  8. James, B.R., Riha, S.J. 1986. pH buffering in forest soil organic horizons: Relevance to acid precipitation. Journal of Environmental Quality 15(3): 229-234. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1986.00472425001500030005x
  9. Johannessen, L.M. 1999. Guidance note on leachate management for municipal solid waste landfills. Urban Development Division. The World Bank. Urban Waste Management Working Paper Series No. 5.
  10. Johnson, B.T. 2005. Microtox$^{(R)}$ acute toxicity test. In Small-scale freshwater toxicity investigations (pp. 69-105). Springer Netherlands.
  11. Lee, M., Mun, S.P., Prewitt, L. 2014. Formaldehyde release from medium density fiberboard in simulated landfills for recycling. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 42(5): 597-604. https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2014.42.5.597
  12. Looser, M.O., Parriaux, A., Bensimon, M. 1999. Landfill underground pollution detection and characterization using inorganic traces. Water Research 33(17): 3609-3616. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00062-7
  13. Nemerow, N.L. 1991. Stream, lake estuary and ocean pollution. New York, NY: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
  14. Renou, S., Givaudan, J.G., Poulain, S., Dirassouyan, F., Moulin, P. 2008. Landfill leachate treatment: Review and opportunity. Journal of Hazardous Materials 150(3): 468-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.09.077
  15. RISI (Resource Information Systems Inc.). 2014. Particleboard and MDF Commentary - A monthly economic analysis of the North American particleboard and MDF markets.
  16. Saarela, J. 2003. Pilot investigations of surface parts of three closed landfills and factors affecting them. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 84(1-2): 183-192. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022859718865
  17. Schrab, G.E., Brown, K.W., Donnelly, K.C. 1993. Acute and genetic toxicity of municipal landfill leachate. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 69(1-2): 99-112. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00478351
  18. US EPA Method 410.4-1. 1993. The determination of chemical oxygen demand by semi-automated colorimetry. Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory. Office of Research and Development. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH.
  19. US EPA Method 5210 B. 1999. Biochemical oxygen demand (BOD). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  20. US EPA Method 8315A. 1996. Compendium determination of air pollutants in indoor air. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
  21. US EPA. 2005. Municipal solid waste in the United States: 2003 facts and figures. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

Cited by

  1. Change in Chemical Compositions of Leachate and Medium Density Fiberboard from a Laboratory-scale Simulated Landfill vol.44, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.2.231
  2. Evaluation of Anti-Sapstain Activity of Rice Powder Adhesives Modified with Wood Preservatives vol.44, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.6.872