DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Stability & Changes of Participant Roles in Bullying and Associated Environmental Characteristics : With a Focus on Peer Bystanders

아동 후기 또래괴롭힘 참여자 역할의 안정성 및 변화와 환경적 특성과의 관계 : 주변또래의 역할을 중심으로

  • 서미정 (제주대학교 생활환경복지학부 아동.생활복지전공)
  • Received : 2015.05.29
  • Accepted : 2015.07.19
  • Published : 2015.08.31

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to explore the stability and changes of participant roles in the bullying process, namely, bullies, victims, followers, outsiders, and defenders. In addition, this study examined associated environmental characteristics of both followers and defenders in sixth graders among peer bystanders in the fifth grade. The participants consisted of 461 children from grades 5 to 6(male: 239, female: 222). Data were collected at one year intervals for two data points. The results indicated a moderate consistency in the participant roles the children take across time. Followers and outsiders tended to change differently in their roles one year later. On the other hand, defenders, bullies, and victims tended to keep the same role. The defenders group generally had higher levels of peer attachment, teacher attachment and community's supervision than the followers group. The implications for future research and intervention in bullying were also discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J. (2012). The moderating effects of social anxiety on the relationships between adolescents' moral disengagement and the bullying assistant behavior. Unpublished master's thesis, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  2. Baik, J. (2010). Understandings peer victimization in boys and girls: Adolescent's cognitive, emotional, social characteristics and bullying participant role. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  3. Cha, Y. (2005). Participant roles in peer bullying and social understandings among grade school children. Unpublished master's thesis, Yonsei University, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Choi, M. (2000). The influences of victimization by peers on self-esteem of adolescents and experiences of victims - The short-term longitudinal study and in-depth interview -. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  5. Han, M. (1996). A study on stress, perceived social supports, and behavior problems of children. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea.
  6. Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  7. Hyun, A., & Kim, Y. (2014). The role of collective efficacy and parental bonding in victimdefending behavior: The mediating effect of empathy. Journal of Adolescent Welfare, 16(1), 129-153.
  8. Karatzias, A., Power, K. G., & Swanson, V. (2002). Bullying and victimization in Scottish secondary schools: Same or separate entities? Aggressive Behavior, 28(1), 45-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.90005
  9. Kim, D. (2012, September). 31% out of victims in bullying thought about suicide more than once. Daejonilbo, Retrieved October 25, 2012, from http://www.daejonilbo.com/news/newsitem.asp?pk_no=1026249.
  10. Kim, J., & Lee, D. (1996). A study on strains and Juvnile delinquency. Korean Institute of Criminology, 1996(3), 1-164.
  11. Kim, Y., & Han, S. (2011). Discriminant analysis of bullying participant roles among children. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 32(3), 19-41. https://doi.org/10.5723/KJCS.2011.32.3.19
  12. Kwon, S. (2012). The study on music therapy programs for school violence perpetrators and school violence victims. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul Christian University, Seoul, Korea.
  13. Ladd, G. W., & Burgess, K. B. (2001). Do relational risks and protective factors moderate the linkages between childhood aggression and early psychological and school Adjustment?. Child Development, 72, 1579-1601. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00366
  14. Lee, S., & Song, K. (2012). The structural relations among attachment, emotion regulation, social self-efficacy, defending and outsider behaviors of middle school students. The Korean Journal of School Psychology, 9(2), 393-415. https://doi.org/10.16983/kjsp.2012.9.2.393
  15. Maeda, R. (2003). Empathy, emotional regulation, and perspective taking as predictors of children's participation in bullying. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.
  16. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life course-persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674-701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
  17. Myron-Wilson, R. (1999). Parental style: And how it may influence a child's role in bullying. Biennial Conference of the Society for Research in Child Development.
  18. O'Brien, D. T., & Kauffman, R. A. (2013). Broken windows and low adolescent prosociality: Not cause and consequence, but co-symptoms of low collective efficacy. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(3-4), 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9555-1
  19. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in school. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
  20. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school. Cambridge, Ma: Blacwell.
  21. Park, Y. (1995). Parental childrearing, behavior, children's sibling relationships and children's self-esteem. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Korea University, Seoul, Korea.
  22. Pellegrini, A. D., & Long, J. D. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and vitimization during the transition from primary school through secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259-280. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151002166442
  23. Perry, D. G., Kusel, S. J., & Perry, L. C. (1988). Victims of peer aggression. Developmental Psychology, 24, 807-814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.24.6.807
  24. Pozzoli, T., & Gini, G. (2010). Active defending and passive bystanding behavior in bullying: The role of personal characteristics and perceived peer pressure. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 815-827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-010-9399-9
  25. Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Bjorkqvist, K., Osterman, K., & Kaukiainen, A. (1996). Bullying as a group process: Participant roles and their relations to social status within the group. Aggressive Behavior, 22(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1996)22:1<1::AID-AB1>3.0.CO;2-T
  26. Salmivalli, C., Lappalainen, M., & Lagerspetz, K. (1998). Stability and change of behavior in connection with bullying in schools: A two-year follow-up. Aggressive Behavior, 24(3), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1998)24:3<205::AID-AB5>3.0.CO;2-J
  27. Salmivalli, C., & Voeten, M. (2004). Connections between attitudes, group norms, and behavior in bullying situations. International Journal of Behavior Development, 28(3), 246-258. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250344000488
  28. Seo, M. (2006). An Exploration on Mitigative Factors of Bullying - Focused on Analysis by Types of Outsider -. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.
  29. Seo, M. (2008). Participation in bullying: Bystanders' characteristics and role behaviors. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 29(5), 79-96.
  30. Seo, M. (2012). Subtypes of changes in overt and relational aggression and predictors of high-risk trajectories in children. Journal of The Korean Society of Child Welfare, 38, 157-186.
  31. Seo, M., & Kim, K. (2004). Personality and environmental characteristics of children who are bullies and/or Victims. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 25(2), 93-188.
  32. Shim, M., & Seo, M. (2013). The class variables influencing on bystanding and defending behavior in bullying: Focusing on class norms and teacher's supervision. The Korea Journal of Youth Counseling, 21(2), 225-246.
  33. Sim, H. (2005). A cross-sectional and short-term longitudinal study on bullying/victimization and interpersonal behavior characteristics: The participant roles approach. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 26(5), 263-279.
  34. Sim, H. (2008). Bullying situations: Gender differences in social status and social emotions of participant roles. Korean Journal of Child Studies, 29(3), 191-205.
  35. Smith, P. K. (1991). The silent nightmare: Bullying and victimization in school peer groups. The Psychologist: The Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 4, 243-248.
  36. Song, K. (2010). The relationship among theory of mind, proactive bullying and defending behaviors in adolescents: Mediation effect of moral disengagement and moral emotions. Unpublished master's thesis, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
  37. Sutton, J., & Smith, P. K. (1999). Bullying as a group process: An adaptation of the participant role approach. Aggressive Behavior, 25(2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2337(1999)25:2<97::AID-AB3>3.0.CO;2-7
  38. Whitney, I., & Smith, P. K. (1993). A survey of the nature and extent of bullying in junior/middle and secondary schools. Educational Research, 35, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188930350101
  39. Yoon, J. (2013, April). 44% out of victims in school bullying thought about suicide. Segyeilbo, Retrieved May 5, 2013, from http://www.segye.com/content/html/2013/04/22/20130422004915.html.
  40. Yom, Y. (2012). The development of the group counseling program applying meditation for adolescents with school violence assault. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Sookmyung Women's University, Seoul, Korea.

Cited by

  1. Investigation of the bystander effect in school bullying: Comparison of experiential, psychological and situational factors vol.38, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034317699997