DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Association of Cigarette Prices with the Prevalence of Smoking in Korean University Students: Analysis of Effects of the Tobacco Control Policy

  • Han, Jin-Ok (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Im, Jeong-Soo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Yim, Jun (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Yoon-Hyeong (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ko, Kwang-Pil (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Junghoon (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hee Gerl (College of Nursing, Gachon University) ;
  • Noh, Yunhong (Medical Campus, Gachon University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Khi (Department of Radiological Science, Gachon University College of Medicine) ;
  • Oh, Dae-Kyu (Department of Preventive Medicine, Gachon University College of Medicine)
  • Published : 2015.08.03

Abstract

Background: Increased pricing of cigarettes might be one of the most effective approaches for reducing the prevalence of smoking. This study aimed to investigate the effects of increasing cigarette prices through taxation by a tobacco intervention policy on the changes in smoking prevalence in Korean university students. Materials and Methods: The participants in this study were 23,047 healthy university students aged 18-29 years from a health examination in 2011-2015. We investigated the adjusted prevalence of daily and occasional smoking before and after increasing cigarette prices through taxation. Results: The prevalence of occasional smoking was significantly decreased in 2015 from 2014 in both male (from 10.7% in 2014 to 5.4%) and female (from 3.6% to 1.1%) students, but the prevalence of daily smoking did not decrease significantly. The frequency of individuals who had attempted smoking cessation during the past year was significantly higher among occasional smokers in male students (90.2%) compared with daily smokers (64.9%). For female students, there were no differences in experience of smoking cessation, willingness for smoking cessation, or E-cigarette experience between daily and occasional smokers. Conclusions: We found that a policy of increasing cigarette prices through taxation is associated with decreases in the prevalence of occasional smokers, who have relatively lower nicotine dependence compared with individuals who smoke daily. The results of our study suggest that social support and direct intervention for smoking cessation at the community level are needed for university students alongside the pricing policy.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed HG (2013). Survey on knowledge and attitudes related to the relation between tobacco, alcohol abuse and cancer in the northern state of Sudan. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 14, 2483-6. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.4.2483
  2. Ahmed HG, Eltom FM, Doumi MA (2014). Burden of cancer in north sudan: a community-based survey. Egypt Acad J Biolog Sci, 6, 55-63.
  3. Aldrich MC, Hidalgo B, Widome R, et al (2015). The role of epidemiology in evidence-based policy making: a case study of tobacco use in youth. Ann Epidemiol, 25, 360-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2014.03.005
  4. Alshammari FD, Khalifa AM, Kosba AA, et al (2015). Assessment of perception of medical students in regard to links between tobacco or alcohol use and cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 2697-700. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.7.2697
  5. Amato MS, Boyle RG, Brock B (2015). Higher price, fewer packs: evaluating a tobacco tax increase with cigarette sales data. Am J Public Health, 105, 5-8. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302477
  6. Berrigan D, Dodd K, Troiano RP, et al (2003). Patterns of health behavior in U.S. adults. Prev Med, 36, 615-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00067-1
  7. Bodner ME, Miller WC, Rhodes RE, et al (2011). Smoking cessation and counseling: knowledge and views of Canadian physical therapists. Phys Ther, 91, 1051-62. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20100245
  8. Chaloupka FJ, Yurekli A, Fong GT (2012). Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tob Control, 21, 172-80. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050417
  9. Hammond D, Fong GT, Zanna MP, et al (2006). Tobacco denormalization and industry beliefs among smokers from four countries. Am J Prev Med, 31, 225-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.04.004
  10. Jung-Choi KH, Khang YH, Cho HJ (2012). Hidden female smokers in Asia: a comparison of self-reported with cotinineverified smoking prevalence rates in representative national data from an Asian population. Tob Control, 21, 536-42. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050012
  11. Jung Yh, Ko Sj (2014). Composite indicator for tobacco control policy in Korea. Health and Social forum, 211, 1226-3648.
  12. Kim AE, Loomis BR, Busey AH, et al (2013). Influence of retail cigarette advertising, price promotions, and retailer compliance on youth smoking-related attitudes and behaviors. J Public Health Manag Pract, 19, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0b013e318249bc06
  13. Kim EK, Song MR (2013). An analysis of the characteristics and preferences related to a smoking cessation program among smoking college students. J Korean Biol Nurs Sci, 15, 184-92. https://doi.org/10.7586/jkbns.2013.15.4.184
  14. Kim HC, Cho KS, Kwon SM, et al (2012). The effect of the increase in tobacco price on adolescent smoking in Korea : smoking reduction and brand switching. Health and Social, 32, 429-60.
  15. Kim MK (2012). (The) influence of smoking cessation stage on effectiveness of anti-smoking psas : emphasis on the message type and the message appeal type. master's thesis.
  16. Klumbiene J, Sakyte E, Petkeviciene J, et al (2015). The effect of tobacco control policy on smoking cessation in relation to gender, age and education in Lithuania, 1994-2010. BMC Public Health, 15, 181. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-1525-8
  17. Ko YJ, Kim S, Kim KH, et al (2015). Cancer screening adherence of asian women according to biochemically-verified smoking status: Korea national health and nutrition examination survey. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 16, 4081-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2015.16.9.4081
  18. Kostova D, Ross H, Blecher E, et al (2011). Is youth smoking responsive to cigarette prices? Evidence from low-and middle-income countries. Tob Control, 20, 419-24. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.038786
  19. Lee CY, Shin S, Lee HK, et al (2009). Validation of self-report on smoking among university students in Korea. Am J Health Behav, 33, 540-9.
  20. Lee HO, Kim AJ (2014). Analysis of smoking characteristics and oral health practice in health and non-health related majors. J Dent Hyg Sci, 14, 183-90.
  21. Lee M, Lim S, Lee S, et al (2014). Analyzing issues and a status investigation of studies on tobacco control policies in South Korea. Health Social, 34, 165-91.
  22. Levy D, de Almeida LM, Szklo A (2012a). The Brazil SimSmoke policy simulation model: the effect of strong tobacco control policies on smoking prevalence and smoking-attributable deaths in a middle income nation. PLoS Med, 9, 1001336. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001336
  23. Levy DT, Blackman K, Currie LM, et al (2012b). SimSmokeFinn: how far can tobacco control policies move Finland toward tobacco-free 2040 goals? Scand J Public Health, 40, 544-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494812456635
  24. Martinez C, Fu M, Martinez-Sanchez JM, et al (2014). Impact of a long-term tobacco-free policy at a comprehensive cancer center: a series of cross-sectional surveys. BMC Public Health, 14, 1228. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-1228
  25. Messer K, Pierce JP, Zhu SH, et al (2007). The california tobacco control program's effect on adult smokers: (1) Smoking cessation. Tob Control, 16, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2006.016873
  26. Ministry of Health & Welfare 2014. Titl, Sejong, Welfare MoH.
  27. Ministry of Health & Welfare. 2015a. 2015 register for smoking cessation program in public health clinic [Online]. Osong: Ministry of Health & Welfare.
  28. Ministry of Health & Welfare 2015b. Titl, Sejong, Welfare MoH.
  29. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US) Office 2012. Titl, Atlanta GA,
  30. OECD publishing 2013. OECD Factbook 2013, OECD publishing.
  31. Peltzer K, Pengpid S (2014). Tobacco use, beliefs and risk awareness in university students from 24 low, middle and emerging economy countries. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 10033-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.22.10033
  32. Rennen E, Nagelhout GE, van den Putte B, et al (2014). Associations between tobacco control policy awareness, social acceptability of smoking and smoking cessation. Findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Europe surveys. Health Educ Res, 29, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/her/cyt073
  33. Sarna L, Wewers ME, Brown JK, et al (2001). Barriers to tobacco cessation in clinical practice: report from a national survey of oncology nurses. Nurs Outlook, 49, 166-72. https://doi.org/10.1067/mno.2001.115448
  34. Shapiro JA, Seeff LC, Nadel MR (2001). Colorectal cancerscreening tests and associated health behaviors. Am J Prev Med, 21, 132-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-3797(01)00329-4
  35. Steptoe A, Wardle J, Cui W, et al (2002). An international comparison of tobacco smoking, beliefs and risk awareness in university students from 23 countries. Addiction, 97, 1561-71. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00269.x
  36. The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. 2015. Increasing the federal tobacco tax reduces tobacco use [Online]. Washington, DC: The Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids.
  37. Waters EA, Janssen E, Kaufman AR, et al (2015). The relationship between young adult smokers' beliefs about nicotine addiction and smoking-related affect and cognitions. J Cancer Educ.
  38. West R, Zatonski W, Przewozniak K, et al (2007). Can we trust national smoking prevalence figures? Discrepancies between biochemically assessed and self-reported smoking rates in three countries. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 16, 820-2. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-06-0679