DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Spatial analysis of Relative Risks for skin cancer morbidity and mortality in Iran, 2008 - 2010

  • Zayeri, Farid (Department of Biostatistics, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kavousi, Amir (Department of Basic Sciences, School of Health, Safety and Environment, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Najafimehr, Hadis (Department of Biostatistics, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences)
  • Published : 2015.08.03

Abstract

Background: One of the most prevalent cancers in whole world is skin cancer and its prevalence is growing. The present research sought to estimate relative risk of morbidity and mortality due to skin cancer. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study. The required data were gathered from the registered cancer reports of Cancer Control Office in the Center for Non Communicable Disease of the Iranian Ministry of Health (MOH). The data were extracted at province level in the time span of 2008-10. WINBUGS software was used to analyze the data and to identify high risk regions. ArcGIS10 was utilized to map the distribution of skin cancer and to demonstrate high risk provinces by using classic and fully Bayesian models taking into account spatial correlations of adjacent regions separately for men and women. Results: Relative risk of morbidity for women in Yazd and for men in Kurdistan and relative risk of mortality for women in Bushehr and for men in Kohgiluyeh were found to be the highest. Bayesian model due to regarding adjacent regions correlation, have precise estimation in comparing to classical model. More frequent epidemiological studies to enact skin cancer prevention programs. Conclusions: High risk regions in Iran include central and highland regions. Therefore it is suggested that health decision makers enact public education, using anti UV creams and sunglasses for those parts as a short preventing program.

Keywords

References

  1. Arora A, Attwood J (2009). Common skin cancers and their precursors. Surg Clin North Am, 89, 703-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suc.2009.03.007
  2. Banerjee S, Bradely P, Gelfand A (2004). Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. Chapman and Hall, Londen.
  3. Bell S, Broemeling L (2000). A Bayesian analysis for spatial process with application to disease mapping. Stat Med, 19, 957-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000415)19:7<957::AID-SIM396>3.0.CO;2-Q
  4. Belli S, Benedetti M, Comba P, et al (2004). Case-control study on cancer risk associated to residence in the neighbourhood of a petrochemical plant. Eur J Epidemiol, 19, 49-54.
  5. Besag J, Moran PAP (1976). On the estimation and testing of spatial interaction in gussianlaiiice processes. Biometrica, 62, 555-62.
  6. Besag J, York J, Mollie A (1991). Bayesian image restoration with two application in spatial statistics. Ann Inst Statist Math, 43, 1-59. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00116466
  7. Brody JG, Aschengrau A, McKelvey W (2004). Breast cancer risk and historical exposure to pesticides from wide-area applications assessed with GIS. Environ Health Perspect, 112, 889-97. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.6845
  8. Chang Y, Anewton J (2009). A Pooled Analysis of Melanocytic Naevus Phenotype and the Risk of Cutaneous Melanoma at Different Latitudes. Int J cancer, 124, 420-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.23869
  9. Cressie N (1993). Statistics for Spatial Data, New York, Wiley.
  10. Daniels F, Brophy D, Lobitz WC (2000). Histolochemical responses of human skin following ultraviolet irradiation. Photodermotolog, 49, 352-8.
  11. Dirk UP, et al (2008). Spatial analysis epidemiology. Oxford university press, 97-100.
  12. Gelfan A (1996). Model determination using sampling based methods in markov chain monte carlo in practice. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 145-57.
  13. Kavousi A, Bashiri Y, Mehrabi Y, Etemad K, Teymourpour A (2015). Identifying High-Risk Clusters of Gastric Cancer Incidence in Iran, 2004-2009. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 10335-8. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.23.10335
  14. Kavousi A, meshkani MR, Mohammadzadeh M (2009). Spatial analysis of relative risk of lip cancer in Iran: a bayasian approach. Environmetrics, 20, 347-59. https://doi.org/10.1002/env.927
  15. Katayama K, Yakoyama K, Yako-Suketomo H, et al (2014) Breast Cancer Clustering in Kanagawa, Japan: AGeographic Analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 455-60. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.1.455
  16. Lawson A, Biggeri A, Boehning D, et al (2000). Disease mapping models: An empirical evaluation. Disease Mapping Collaborative Group. Stat Med, 19, 17-41.
  17. Mehrabi Y, Mahaki B, Kavousi A(2014). Mapping spatial variation of disease using classic and Bayesian models. J Health Syst Res, 10, 201-11.
  18. Melnick AL, Fleming DW (1999). Modern geographic information system: promise and pitfalls. J Public Health Manag Pract, 5 , 8-10.
  19. Raiesi R, Bayati A (2013). Spatial distribution of multiple sclerosis disease in ChaharmahalvaBakhtiari province in 20-years period. J ShahrekordUniv Med Sci, 15, 73-82.
  20. Shah SA, Neoh H, Sharizman S, et al (2014). Spatial Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Cases in Kuala Lumpur. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 15, 1149-54. https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.3.1149
  21. Snow J (1855). On the Mode of Communication of Cholera. 2 ed. London, UK: John hurchill, 162.
  22. Spiegelhalter D, Thomas A, Best N(2003). winBugs user manual, version 1.4, MRC Biostatistics Unit, Cambridge, available at www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/bugs/winbugs/contents.shtml.
  23. Valavi E, RafieSh, Pakseresht P, Siadat S (2013). Prevalence of skin cancer in southwest of Iran. Koomesh, 15, 83-8.
  24. van Dam RM1, Huang Z, Rimm EB, et al (1999). Risk factors for basal cell carcinoma of the skinin men:results from the health professionals follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol, 150, 459-68. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010034
  25. Wehner M, Shive M, Chren M, et al (2012). Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and metaanalysis, BMJ, 345, 5909. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5909