References
- AAAS(American Association for the Advancement of Science). (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project 2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.
- AAAS(American Association for the Advancement of Science). (2001). Atlas of science literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS/National Science Teachers Association.
- Alters, B. J., & Alters, S. M. (2001). Defending evolution: A guide to the creation/evolution controversy. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett.
- Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891-1901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00115.x
- Anderson, D. L., Fisher, K. M., & Norman, G. J. (2002). Development and evaluation of the conceptual inventory of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 952-978. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10053
- Andersson, B., & Wallin, A. (2006). On Developing content-oriented theories taking biological evolution as an example. International Journal of Science Education, 28(6), 673-695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498385
- Asterhan, C. S., & Schwarz, B. B. (2007). The effects of monological and dialogical argumentation on concept learning in evolutionary theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 626-639. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.626
- Barron, B. (2000). Problem solving in video-based microworlds: Collaboration and individual outcomes of high achieving sixth grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 391-398. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.391
- Bell, P., & Linn, M. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797-817. https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900412284
- Bennett, J., Hogarth, S., Lubben, F., Campbell, B., & Robinson, A. (2010). Talking science: The research evidence on the use of small group discussions in science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 32(1), 69-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690802713507
- Berland, L. K., & McNeill, K. L. (2010). A Learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts. Science Education, 94(5), 765-793. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20402
- Brumby, M. N. (1981). The use of problem-solving in meaningful learning in biology. Research in Science Education, 11(1), 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356773
- Bybee, R. W., & DeBoer, G. E. (1994). Research on goals for the science curriculum. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (Volume II), (pp. 357-387). New York, NY: MacMillan.
- Catley, K. M. (2006). Darwin's missing link-a novel paradigm for evolution education. Science Education, 90(5), 767-783. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20152
- Chi, M. T. H., Kristensen, K., & Roscoe, R. (2012). Misunderstanding emergent causal mechanisms in natural selection. In K. S. Rosengren, E. M. Evans, S. Brem, & G. M. Sinatra, (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution(pp. 145-173). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Chung, W., & Cha, H. (1994). High school students' misconceptions on genetics and evolution. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 14(2), 170-183.
- Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543064001001
- Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125-129. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Duschl, R. A., & Osborne, J. (2002). Supporting and promoting argumentation discourse in science education. Studies in Science Education, 38(1), 39-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057260208560187
- Duschl, R. (2007). Quality argumentation and epistemic criteria. In S. Erduran, & M. Jimenez-Aleixandre, (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research(pp.159-175). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Academic Publishers.
- Erduran, S., Simon, S., & Osborne, J. (2004). TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's argument pattern for studying science discourse. Science Education, 88(6), 915-933. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20012
- Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998) The nature of naive explanations of natural selection, International Journal of Science Education, 20(10), 1231-1256. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980201005
- Ha, M., & Cha, H. (2007). A Qualitative cross-sectional study on explanation about evolution mechanism. The Korean Journal of Biology Education. 35(1), 106-116.
- Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97(5), 723-744. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21072
- Hogan, K., & Nastasi, B. K., & Pressley, M. (1999). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17(4), 379-432. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532690XCI1704_2
- Hogan, K., & Maglienti, M. (2001). Comparing the epistemological underpinnings of students' and scientists' reasoning about conclusions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 663-687. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.1025
- Jimenez-Aleixandre, M., Rodriguez, M., & Duschl, R. A. (2000). “Doing the lesson” or “doing science”: Argument in high school genetics. Science Education, 84(6), 757-792. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<757::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-F
- Jo, J. (2014). Pre-service biology teachers' perspectives about biological meanings of competition and adaptation. Master's Thesis. Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
- Jung, J., & Kim, H. B. (2010). Influence of ACESE on high school students' argumentative structure and evolutionary conception. Biology Education. 38(1), 168-183. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2010.38.1.168
- Kang, N., & Lee, E. (2013). Argument and argumentation: A Review of literature for clarification of translated words. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 33(6), 1119-1138. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.6.1119
- Kim, H., & Song, J. (2004). The Exploration of open scientific inquiry model emphasizing students' argumentation. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 24(6), 1216-1234.
- Kim, J., & Cha, H. (2014). Association Analysis of Variables Affected for Macroevolution Conceptions of In-service and Pre-service Biology Teachers. Biology Education. 42(4), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2014.42.4.428
- Kuhn, D., & Udell, W. (2003). The development of argument skills. Child Development, 74(5), 1245-1260. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00605
- Kwon, M. (2013). Development and application of immunity concept instruction program utilizing student generated role-playing analogy: Focused on 'defense action' chapter in life science. Graduate School Of Korea National Education.
- Kwon, J., Kim, B., Kang, N., Choi, B., Kim, H., Paik., S., Yang, I., Kwon, Y., Cha, H., Woo, J., & Chung, J. (2012). Theories in science education. Seoul: Kyoyookbook Publication Co.
- Lawson, A. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387-1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052117
- Lee, H., Cho, H., & Sohn, J. (2009). The Teachers' view on using argumentation in school science. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 29(6), 666-679.
- Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. Alexander, & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology(pp. 511-544). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
- McNeill, K. L., Lizotte, D. J., Krajcik, J., & Marx, R. W. (2006). Supporting students' construction of scientific explanations by fading scaffolds in instructional materials. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(2), 153-191. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1502_1
- Min, B. (2000). Argument structure analysis of newspaper editorials. Korean Language and Literature, 127, 133-154.
- MOEST(Ministry of Education, Science and Technology) (2011). 2009 Revised Science Curriculum, Seoul Republic of Korea: Ministry of Education, Science and Technology.
- Nadelson, L. S., & Southerland, S. A. (2009) Development and preliminary evaluation of the measure of understanding of macroevolution: introducing the MUM, The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(2), 151-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220970903292983
- NRC(National Research Council) (1996). National science education standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
- NRC(National Research Council) (2011). A framework for K-12 science education; Practice, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington D. C.: National Academy Press.
- NRC(National Research Council) (2013). Next generation science standards. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
- Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools?. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7
- Nelson, C. E. (2008). Teaching evolution(and all of biology) more effectively: Strategies for engagement, critical reasoning, and confronting misconceptions. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 48(2), 213-225. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icn027
- Ohlsson, S., & Bee, N. V. (1992). The effect of expository text on students' explanations of biological evolution. OERI Report. University of Pittsburgh: Learning Research and Development Center.
- Opfer, J. E., Nehm, R. H., & Ha, M. (2012). Cognitive foundations for science assessment design: Knowing what students know about evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 744-777. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21028
- Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), 994-1020. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20035
- Park, J. (2013). Comparative study on the content elements and explanation way of evolution presented in science textbooks of Korea and the US. Biology Education. 41(3), 406-420. https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2013.41.3.406
- Park, J., Lee, M., & Lee, K. (2003). The effects of activity-centered instruction on understanding of natural selection concept. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 23(5), 505-516.
- Park, J. (2007). An Investigation into the relationship among cognitive presence, sef-Efficacy, participation, satisfaction, and achievement in an e-Learning environment. Department of Educational Technology The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University.
- Reece, J. B., Urry, L. A., Cain, M. L., Wasserman, S. A., Minorsky, P. V., & Jackson, R. B. (2011). Campbell Biology, 9th Eds. Pearson Education, Inc.
- Sadler, T. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: a critical review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Sampson, V. & Clark, D. (2008). The Impact of collaboration on the outcomes of scientific argumentation. Science Education, 93(3), 448-484. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20306
- Sampson, V., & Clark, D. (2009). A Comparison of the collaborative scientific argumentation practices of two high and two low performing groups. Research in Science Education, 41(1), 63-97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9146-9
- Sampson, V., Grooms, J., & Walker, J. (2010). Argument-driven inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments: An exploratory study. Science Education, 95(2), 217-257. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20421
- Sandoval, W. A., & Millwood, K. (2005). The quality of students' use of evidence in written scientific explanations. Cognition and Instruction, 23(1), 23-55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2301_2
- Shin, J., & Choi, A. (2014). Trends in research studies on scientific argument and writing in Korea. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education. 34(2), 107-122. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.2.0107
- Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52(2), 170-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.001
- Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical Issues. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 539-571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9216-4
- Tavares, M. L., Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Mortimer, E. F. (2010). Articulation of conceptual knowledge and argumentation practices by high school students in evolution problems. Science & Education, 19(6-8), 573-598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9206-6
- The National Institute of The Korean Language (2014). The Korean Standard Dictionary. Cited in Dec. 3, 2014, http://stdweb2.korean.go.kr/search/List_dic.jsp.
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of the argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Vries, E., Lund, K., & Baker, M. (2002). Computer-mediated epistemic dialogue: Explanation and argumentation as vehicles for understanding scientific notions. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11(1), 63-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_3
- Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How teaching matters: Bringing the classroom back into discussions of teacher quality. National Assessment of Educational Progress. Policy Information Center.
Cited by
- The Comparative Analysis of Evolution Conceptions in Pre- and In-Service Biology Teachers vol.44, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2016.44.2.277
- 초등과학영재들의 자연선택 개념 형성을 위한 논변활동 효과 분석 vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0591
- 중국, 미국, 독일의 생물전공자와 비교한 한국 생물예비교사의 자연선택개념 이해 수준 분석 vol.36, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.5.0729
- 우리나라 중학생들의 TIMSS 2015 생명과학 영역 성취 특성 분석 vol.45, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2017.45.3.390
- 중학교 '진화' 단원 디지털 교재 개발 및 적용 vol.39, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.1.89
- Recalibrating the evolution versus creationism debate for student learning: towards students’ evaluation of evidence in an argumentation task vol.43, pp.18, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.2004330