DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A simple estimate of the carbon budget for burned and unburned Pinus densiflora forests at Samcheok-si, South Korea

  • Lim, Seok-Hwa (Land & Housing Institute, Korea Land & Housing Corporation) ;
  • Joo, Seung Jin (Center for Atmospheric and Environmental Modeling, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yang, Keum-Chul (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2014.11.01
  • Accepted : 2015.04.03
  • Published : 2015.08.28

Abstract

To clarify the effects of forest fire on the carbon budget of a forest ecosystem, this study compared the seasonal variation of soil respiration, net primary production and net ecosystem production (NEP) over the year in unburned and burned Pinus densiflora forest areas. The annual net carbon storage (i.e., NPP) was $5.75t\;C\;ha^{-1}$ in the unburned site and $2.14t\;C\;ha^{-1}$ in the burned site in 2012. The temperature sensitivity of soil respiration (i.e., $Q_{10}$ value) was higher in the unburned site than in the burned site. The annual soil respiration rate was estimated by the exponential regression equation with the soil temperatures continuously measured at the soil depth of 10 cm. The estimated annual soil respiration and heterotrophic respiration (HR) rates were 8.66 and $4.50t\;C\;ha^{-1}yr^{-1}$ in the unburned site and 4.08 and $2.12t\;C\;ha^{-1}yr^{-1}$ in the burned site, respectively. The estimated annual NEP in the unburned and burned forest areas was found to be 1.25 and $0.02t\;C\;ha^{-1}yr^{-1}$, respectively. Our results indicate that the differences of carbon budget and cycling between both study sites are considerably correlated with the losses of living plant biomass, insufficient nutrients and low organic materials in the forest soil due to severe damages caused by the forest fire. The burned Pinus densiflora forest area requires at least 50 years to attain the natural conditions of the forest ecosystem prior to the forest fire.

Keywords

References

  1. Aber JD, Melillo JM. 2001. Terrestrial ecosystems, 2nd Ed. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  2. Anderson JPE. 1982. Soil respiration. In: Methods of soil analysis, Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties (Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR, eds). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 831-871.
  3. Chae NY, Kim J, Kim DG, Lee DW, Kim RH, Ban JY, Son YH. 2003. Measurement of soil $CO_2$ efflux using a closed dynamic chamber system. Korean J of Agric For Meteorol 5: 94-100.
  4. Chandler C, Cheney P, Thomas P, Trabaud L, Williams D. 1983. Fire in forestry, Vol. I: Forest fire behavior and effects. Wiley, New York, NY.
  5. Chapman SB. 1979. Some interrelationships between soil and root respiration in lowland Calluna heathland in southern England. Ecology 67: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2259333
  6. Choung Y, Lee BC, Cho JH, Lee KS, Jang IS, Kim SH, Hong SK, Jung HC, Choung HL. 2004. Forest responses to the large-scale east coast fires in Korea. Ecol Res 19: 43-54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1703.2003.00607.x
  7. Crapo NL, Coleman DC. 1972. Root distribution and respiration in a Carolina old field. Oikos 23: 137-139. https://doi.org/10.2307/3543935
  8. Davidson EC, Belk E, Boone RD. 1998. Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest. Glob Chang Biol 4: 217-227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00128.x
  9. Díaz-Delgado R, Lloret F, Pons X, Terradas F. 2002. Satellite evidence of decreasing resilience in Mediterranean plant communities after recurrent wildfires. Ecology 83:2293-2303. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2293:SEODRI]2.0.CO;2
  10. Gough CM, Seiler JR. 2004. The influence of environmental, soil carbon, root, and stand characteristics on soil $CO_2$ efflux in loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantations located on the South Carolina Coastal Plain. For Ecol Manag 191: 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.01.011
  11. Hoover CM. 2008. Field measurements for forest carbon monitoring: a landscape-scale approach. Springer Science & Business Media, New York, NY.
  12. Houghton RA, Hobbie JE, Melillo JM, Moore B, Peterson BJ, Shaver GR, Woodwell GM. 1983. Changes in the carbon content of terrestrial biota and soils between 1860 and 1980: A net release of $CO_2$ to the atmosphere. Ecol Monogr 53: 235-262. https://doi.org/10.2307/1942531
  13. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. The 5th Assessment Report. The physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  14. Jassal RS, Black TA. 2006. Estimating heterotrophic and autotrophic soil respiration using small-area trenched plot technique: Theory and practice. Agric For Meteorol 140:193-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2005.12.012
  15. Jeon IY. 2007. Organic carbon and nutrient distribution in Pinus densiflora forest at Mt.Worak national park. MS thesis. Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)
  16. Jeong MJ. 2007. Soil respiration and soil microbial activity after fire in a Pinus densiflora stand. MS thesis. Kangwon National University, Chuncheon, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)
  17. Johnson FL, Risser PG. 1974. Biomass, annual net primary production and dynamics of six mineral elements in a post oak-blackjack oak forest. Ecology 55: 1246-1258. https://doi.org/10.2307/1935453
  18. Joo SJ, Park MS, Kim GS, Lee CS. 2011. $CO_2$ flux in a cooltemperate deciduous forest (Quercus mongolica) of Mt. Nam in Seoul, Korea. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 95-106. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.012
  19. Kim C. 2006. Soil carbon cycling and soil $CO_2$ efflux in a Red Pine (Pinus densiflora) stand. J Ecol Field Biol 29: 23-27. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2006.29.1.023
  20. Kim SB. 2008. Soil $CO_2$ efflux and leaf-litter decomposition in Pinus densiflora and Quercus variabilis stands. MS thesis. Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)
  21. Knapp AK, Conard SL, Blair JL. 1998. Determinants of soil $CO_2$ flux from a sub–humid grassland: Effect of fire and fire history. Ecol Appl 8: 760-770.
  22. Kwak TB. 2008. Comparative study for the phytomass, NPP and organic carbon budget among Quercus mongolica, Quercus mongolica-Abies holophylla and Pinus densiflora communities in Mt. Jumbong, Korea. MS thesis. Gangneung National University, Gangneung, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)
  23. Landsberg JJ, Gower ST. 1997. Application of physiological ecology to forest management. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
  24. Lee JS. 2011. Monitoring soil respiration using an automatic operating chamber in a Gwangneung temperate deciduous forest. J Ecol Field Biol 34: 411-423. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.043
  25. Lee KS, Choung YS, Kim SC, Shin SS, Noh CH, Park SD. 2004. Development of vegetation structure after forest fire in the east coastal region, Korea. Korean J Ecol 27: 99-106. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2004.27.2.099
  26. Lee MS, Nakane K, Nakatsubo T, Koizumi H. 2003. Seasonal changes in the contribution of root respiration to total soil respiration in a cool-temperate deciduous forest. Plant Soil 255: 311-318. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026192607512
  27. Lee SK. 2011. Production and litter decomposition and organic carbon distribution in Pinus densiflora and Quercus mongolica and Robinia pseudoacacia forests at Mt. Nam. MS thesis. Kongju National University, Gongju, Korea. (in Korean with English abstract)
  28. Lee YY, Mun HT. 2001. A study on the soil respiration in a Quercus acutissima forest. Korean J Ecol 24: 141-147. (in Korean with English abstract)
  29. Maier CA, Kress LW. 2000. Soil $CO_2$ evolution and root respiration in 11 year-old lobolly pine (Pinus taeda) plantations as affected by moisture and nutrient availability. Can J For Res 30: 347-359. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-30-3-347
  30. McHale PJ, Mitchell MJ, Bowles FP. 1998. Soil warming in a northern hardwood forest: Trace gas fluxes and leaf litter decomposition. Can J For Res 28: 1365-1372. https://doi.org/10.1139/x98-118
  31. Mielnick PC, Dugas WA. 2000. Soil $CO_2$ flux in a tall grass prairie. Soil Biol Biochem 32: 221-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(99)00150-9
  32. Moon HS. 2004. Soil respiration on Pinus densiflora, Quercus variabilis and Platycarya strobilacea stands in Jinju, Gyeongnam province. Korean J Ecol 27: 87-92. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2004.27.2.087
  33. Mun HT, Choung YS. 1996. Effects of forest fire on soil nutrients in pine forests in Kosong, Kangwon province. Korean J Ecol 19: 375-383. (in Korean with English abstract)
  34. Nakane K, Yamamoto M, Tsubota H. 1983. Estimation of root respiration rate in a mature forest ecosystem. Jpn J Ecol 33: 397-408.
  35. Park IH, Lee DK, Lee KJ, Moon GS. 1996. Growth, biomass and net production of Quercus species. J Korean For Soc 85: 76-83.
  36. Park IH, Lee SM. 1990. Biomass and net production of Pinus densiflora natural forests of four local forms in Korea. J Korean For Soc 79: 196-204.
  37. Pyo JH, Kim SW, Mun HT. 2003. A study on the carbon budget in Pinus koreansis plantation. Korean J Ecol 26: 129-134. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2003.26.3.129
  38. Raich JW, Nadelhoffer KJ. 1989. Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: Global trends. Ecology 70:1346-1354. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938194
  39. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH. 1992. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44B: 81-99.
  40. Reiners WA. 1968. Carbon dioxide evolution from the floor of three Minnesota forests. Ecology 49: 471-483. https://doi.org/10.2307/1934114
  41. Son YM, Lee KH, Kim RH, Pyo JK, Park IH, Son YW, Lee YJ, Kim CS. 2010. Carbon emission factors of major species for the inventory of greenhouse gas in Korean forests. Korea Forest Research Institute. (in Korean)
  42. Son YW, Kim HW. 1996. Soil respiration in Pinus rigida and Larix leptolepis plantations. J Korean For Soc 85: 496-505. (in Korean with English abstract)
  43. Wang G, Qian J, Cheng G, Lai Y. 2002. Soil organic carbon pool of grassland soils on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and its global implication. Sci Total Environ 291: 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-9697(01)01100-7
  44. Waring RH, Schlesinger WH. 1985. Forest ecosystem; Concept and management. Academic Press, New York, NY.
  45. Winjum JK, Dixon RK, Schroeder PE. 1992. Estimating the global potential of forest and agro-forest management practices to sequester carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut 64: 213-227. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00477103
  46. Witkamp M. 1969. Cycle of temperature and carbon dioxide evolution from the forest floor. Ecology 47: 492-494.
  47. Xu M, Qi Y. 2001. Soil-surface $CO_2$ efflux and its spatial and temporal variations in a young ponderosa pine plantation in northern California. Glob Chang Biol 7: 667-677. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1354-1013.2001.00435.x
  48. Yashiro Y, Lee NYM, Ohtsuka T, Shizu Y, Saitoh TM, Koizumi H. 2010. Biometric-based estimation of net ecosystem production in a mature Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) plantation beneath a flux tower. J Plant Res 123:463-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10265-010-0323-8
  49. Yi MJ. 2003. Soil $CO_2$ evolution in Quercus variabilis and Q. mongolica forests in Chunchon, Kangwon province. J Korean For Soc 92: 263-269.

Cited by

  1. Biomass growth characteristics of 13-year-old Pinus densiflora S. et Z. in a post-fire plantation on different contour conditions in Samcheuk, Korea vol.13, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-015-3583-x