Asia Marketing Journal

  • 제17권3호
  • /
  • Pages.105-127
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1598-7868(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-6500(eISSN)
한국마케팅학회 (Korean Marketing Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Experienced and Inexperienced Consumers' Utilisation of Extrinsic Cues in Product Evaluation: Evidence from the Korean Fine Arts Market

  • Kim, Yoonjeun (Interdisciplinary Program in Arts Management, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Park, Kiwan (Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Yaeri (Graduate School of Business, Seoul National University) ;
  • Chung, Youngmok (Interdisciplinary Program in Arts Management, Graduate School, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.11
  • 심사 : 2015.11.02
  • 발행 : 2015.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study compares experienced and inexperienced consumers' patterns in cue utilisation in product evaluations in the arts market. Borrowing the notion of high- and low-scope cues introduced by the cue-diagnosticity framework, we differentiate between the two most readily discernible extrinsic cues in the fine arts market - an art gallery's brand reputation (a high-scope cue) and certificates of authenticity (a low-scope cue). These two cues are different in nature; the former is more abstract, intangible, and rich in content, so is more difficult to interpret than the latter. Given the differences in experienced and inexperienced consumers' information processing styles, we hypothesise that experienced arts consumers form perceived credibility of and purchase intentions towards artworks based on high-scope cues, whereas inexperienced consumers do so based on low-scope cues. To test our hypothesis, we conducted a consumer intercept study at Korea's two most representative art fairs. The survey participants were categorised into either experienced or inexperienced consumers based on their prior purchase experience, and their responses to a set of attribute combinations about two artworks created by the same artist were collected. The results indicate that experienced participants show higher purchase intentions when an art gallery's reputation is very high, whereas inexperienced participants show higher purchase intentions when artworks are accompanied by certificates of authenticity. This congruency effect between prior experience and cue type is mediated by the perceived credibility of the artworks. The findings suggest a correspondence between a consumer's prior experience and the types of extrinsic cues that are important in product evaluations. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first attempt ever to investigate the role of prior experience in determining when to use high- or low-scope cues. It also provides a useful frame of reference to advise marketers on the effective sales approach based on a client's prior purchase experience.

키워드

과제정보

This research was supported by the Institute of Management Research at Seoul National University.

참고문헌

  1. Akdeniz, B., Calantone, R. J., and Voorhees, C. M. (2013), "Effectiveness of marketing cues on consumer perceptions of quality: The moderating roles of brand reputation and third-party information," Psychology & Marketing, 30(1), 76-89.
  2. Akerlof, G. A. (1970), "The market for "lemons": quality uncertainty and the market mechanism," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(3), 488-500.
  3. Bao, Y., Sheng, S., Bao, Y., and Stewart, D. (2011), "Assessing quality perception of private labels: Intransient cues and consumer characteristics," Journal of Consumer Marketing, 28(6), 448-458.
  4. Bauer, R. A. (1960), "Consumer behavior as risk taking," In Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior (ed. by D.F. Cox), pp. 389-398, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  5. Bettman, J. R. and Park, C. W. (1980), "Effects of prior knowledge and experience and phase of the choice process on consumer decision processes: A protocol analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 234-248.
  6. Boulding, W. and Kirmani, A. (1993), "A consumer-side experimental examination of signaling theory: Do consumers perceive warranties as signals of quality?" Journal of Consumer Research, 20(1), 111-123.
  7. Boyle, P. J. and Lathrop, E. S. (2009), "Are consumers' perceptions of price-quality relationships well calibrated?" International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(1), 58-63.
  8. Cacioppo, J. T. and Petty, R. E. (1982), "The need for cognition," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.
  9. Campbell, D. T. and Stanley, J. C. (1963), Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA, USA.
  10. Chen, S. and Chaiken, S. (1999), "The heuristicsystematic model in its broader context," In Dual-Process Theories in Social Psychology (ed. by S. Chaiken & Y. Trope), pp. 73-96. The Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA.
  11. Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M., and Elorz, M. (2009), "The impact of product category knowledge on consumer use of extrinsic cues - a study involving agrifood products," Food Quality and Preference, 20(3), 176-186.
  12. Chu, W. and Chu, W. (1994), "Signaling quality by selling through a reputable retailer: An example of renting the reputation of another agent," Marketing Science, 13(2), 177-189.
  13. Chung, Y. (2011) Unsung Han. Seoul National University Press, Seoul, Korea.
  14. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., and Aiken, L. S. (2013), Applied Multiple Regression/ Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 3rd edn. Routledge, London, UK.
  15. Cordell, V. V. (1997), "Consumer knowledge measures as predictors in product evaluation," Psychology & Marketing, 14(3), 241-260.
  16. Darby, M. R. and Karni, E. (1973), "Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud," Journal of Law and Economics, 16(1), 67-88.
  17. English, J. F. (2013), "The economics of cultural awards," In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture (ed. by V. A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby), pp. 119-144. Elsevier, San Diego, CA, USA.
  18. Feldman, J. M. and Lynch, J. G. (1988), "Selfgenerated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior," Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421-435.
  19. Gerstner, E. (1985), "Do higher prices signal higher quality?" Journal of Marketing Research, 22(2), 209-215.
  20. Hayes, A. F. (2013), Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, Guilford Press, New York, NY, USA.
  21. Hayes, A. F. and Preacher, K. J. (2013), "Conditional process modeling: Using structural equation modeling to examine contingent causal processes," In Structural Equation Modeling: A Second Course (ed. by G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller), pp. 219-266. Information Age Publishing, Greenwich, CT, USA.
  22. Hong, J. and Sternthal, B. (2010), "The effects of consumer prior knowledge and processing strategies on judgments," Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 301-311.
  23. Jahn, G., Schramm, M., and Spiller, A. (2005), "The reliability of certification: Quality labels as a consumer policy tool," Journal of Consumer Policy, 28(1), 53-73.
  24. Jones, C. and Kim, S. (2010), "Influences of retail brand trust, off-line patronage, clothing involvement and website quality on online apparel shopping intention," International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(6), 627-637.
  25. Keller, K. L. (2003), "Brand synthesis: The multidimensionality of brand knowledge," Journal of Consumer Research, 29(4), 595-600.
  26. Kelley, C. A. (1996), "Warranty and consumer behavior: Product choice," In Product Warranty Handbook (ed. by W. R. Blischke & D. N. P. Murthy), pp. 409-419. Marcel Dekker, New York, NY, USA.
  27. Kelley, C. A. (1988), "An investigation of consumer product warranties as market signals of product reliability," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(2), 72-78.
  28. Khare, A., Labrecque, L. I., and Asare, A. K. (2011), "The assimilative and contrastive effects of word-of-mouth volume: An experimental examination of online consumer ratings," Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 111-126.
  29. Kidd, R. F. (1976), "Manipulation checks: Advantage or disadvantage?" Representative Research in Social Psychology, 7(2), 160-165.
  30. Kihlstrom, R. E. and Riordan, M. H. (1984), "Advertising as a signal," Journal of Political Economy, 92(3), 427-450.
  31. Kirmani, A. (1990), "The effect of perceived advertising costs on brand perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 160-171.
  32. Kirmani, A. (1997), "Advertising repetition as a signal of quality: If it's advertised so much, something must be wrong," Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 77-86.
  33. Lutz, N. A. and Padmanabhan, V. (1995), "Why do we observe minimal warranties?" Marketing Science, 14(4), 417-441.
  34. Maheswaran, D. (1994), "Country of origin as a stereotype: Effects of consumer expertise and attribute strength on product evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, 21(2), 354-365.
  35. Maheswaran, D. and Sternthal, B. (1990), "The effects of knowledge, motivation, and type of message on ad processing and product judgments," Journal of consumer Research, 17(1), 66-73.
  36. Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1986), "Price and advertising signals of product quality," Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 796-821.
  37. Mitra, K., Reiss, M. C., and Capella, L. M. (1999), "An examination of perceived risk, information search and behavioral intentions in search, experience and credence services," Journal of Services Marketing, 13(3), 208-228.
  38. Miyazaki, A. D., Grewal, D., and Goodstein, R. C. (2005), "The effect of multiple extrinsic cues on quality perceptions: a matter of consistency," Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 146-153.
  39. Mizuno, M. and Odagiri, H. (1990), "Does advertising mislead consumers to buy lowquality products?" International Journal of Industrial Organization, 8(4), 545-558.
  40. Moorthy, S. and Srinivasan, K. (1995), "Signaling quality with a money-back guarantee: The role of transaction costs," Marketing Science, 14(4), 442-466.
  41. Moussa, S. and Touzani, M. (2008), "The perceived credibility of quality labels: A scale validation with refinement," International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(5), 526-533.
  42. Park, C. W., Mothersbaugh, D. L., and Feick, L. (1994), "Consumer knowledge assessment," Journal of Consumer Research, 21(1), 71-82.
  43. Pedhazur, E. J. (1982), Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research: Explanation and Prediction, 2nd edn. Rinehart, Holt, & Winston, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
  44. Perdue, B. C. and Summers, J. O. (1986), "Checking the success of manipulations in marketing experiments," Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 317-326.
  45. Petty, R. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1986), "The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion," Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 123-205.
  46. Price, L. J. and Dawar, N. (2002), "The joint effects of brands and warranties in signaling new product quality," Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(2), 165-190.
  47. Purohit, D. and Srivastava, J. (2001), "Effect of manufacturer reputation, retailer reputation, and product warranty on consumer judgments of product quality: A cue diagnosticity framework," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 10(3), 123-134.
  48. Raju, P., Lonial, S., and Mangold, W. (1995), "Differential effects of subjective knowledge, objective knowledge, and usage experience on decision making: an exploratory investigation," Journal of Consumer Psychology, 4(2), 153-180.
  49. Roggeveen, A. L., Goodstein, R. C., and Grewal, D. (2014), "Improving the effect of guarantees: The role of a retailer's reputation," Journal of Retailing, 90(1), 27-39.
  50. Rotfeld, H. J. and Rotzoll, K. B. (1976), "Advertising and product quality: Are heavily advertised products better?" Journal of Consumer Affairs, 10(1), 33-47.
  51. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., and Campbell, D. T. (2002), Experimental and Quasi-experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference, Wadsworth Cengage Learning, Boston, MA, USA.
  52. Schonfeld, S. and Reinstaller, A. (2005), "The effects of gallery and artist reputation on prices in the primary market for art: A note," Vienna University of Economics and Business Working Paper Series, 90, 1-13.
  53. Shimp, T. A. and Bearden, W. O. (1982), "Warranty and other extrinsic cue effects on consumers' risk perceptions," Journal of Consumer Research, 9(1), 38-46.
  54. Spence, M. (1973), "Job market signaling," Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
  55. Shimp, T. A. (1977), "Consumer misperceptions, product failure and producer liability," Review of Economic Studies, 44(3), 561-572.
  56. Steiner, B. E. and Yang, J. (2010), "How do U.S. and Canadian consumers value credence attributes associated with beef labels after the North American BSE crisis of 2003?" International Journal of Consumer Studies, 34(4), 449-463.
  57. Taylor, V. A. (2009), "Brand name and price cue effects within a brand extension context," Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 13(2), 59-75.
  58. Teas, R. K. and Agarwal, S. (2000), "The effects of extrinsic product cues on consumers' perceptions of quality, sacrifice, and value," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(2), 278-290.
  59. Tellis, G. J. and Wernerfelt, B. (1987), "Competitive price and quality under asymmetric information," Marketing Science, 6(3), 240-253.
  60. Wiener, J. L. (1985), "Are warranties accurate signals of product reliability?" Journal of Consumer Research, 12(2), 245-250.
  61. Zorloni, A. (2013), The Economics of Contemporary Art: Markets, Strategies and Stardom, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany.