Geophysics and Geophysical Exploration (지구물리와물리탐사)

Korean Society of Earth and Exploration Geophysicists (한국지구물리·물리탐사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Spatial Autocorrelation (SPAC) Analyses: Temporal Averaging and Spatial Averaging

공간 자기상관(SPAC) 분석 비교: 시간 평균과 공간 평균

  • Park, Jechan (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Kang, Tae-Seob (Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pukyong National University)
  • 박제찬 (부경대학교 지구환경과학과) ;
  • 강태섭 (부경대학교 지구환경과학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.07
  • Accepted : 2015.08.24
  • Published : 2015.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

References

  1. Aki, K., 1957, Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves, with special reference to microtremors, Bulletin of Earthquake Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 25, 415-457.
  2. Capon, J., 1969, High-resolution frequency-wavenumber spectrum analysis, Proceedings of the IEEE, 57, 1408-1418.
  3. Chavez-Garcia, F. J., and Kang, T.-S., 2014, Lateral heterogeneities and microtremors: Limitations of HVSR and SPAC based studies for site response, Engineering Geology, 174, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.02.007
  4. Chavez-Garcia, F. J., Rodriguez, M., and Stephenson, W. R., 2005, An alternative approach to the SPAC analysis of microtremors: exploiting stationarity of noise, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 95, 277-293. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120030179
  5. Cho, I., Tada, T., and Shinozaki, Y., 2004, A new method to determine phase velocities of Rayleigh waves from microseisms, Geophysics, 69, 1535-1551. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1836827
  6. Cho, I., Tada, T., and Shinozaki, Y., 2008, Assessing the applicability of the spatial autocorrelation method: A theoretical approach, Journal of Geophysical Research, 113, B06307.
  7. Chouet, B. C., DeLuca, G., Milana, P., Dawson, M., Martini, C., and Scarpa, R., 1998, Shallow velocity structure of Stromboli volcano, Italy, derived from small-aperture array measurements of Strombolian tremor, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 88, 653-666.
  8. Claprood, M., Asten, M. W., and Kristek, J., 2011, Using the SPAC microtremor method to identify 2D effects and evaluate 1D shear-wave velocity profile in valleys, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101, 826-847. https://doi.org/10.1785/0120090232
  9. Ferrazzini, V., Aki, K., and Chouet, B., 1991, Characteristics of seismic waves composing Hawaiian volcanic tremor and gaspiston events observed by a near-source array, Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 6199-6209. https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB02781
  10. Kang, T.-S., and Shin, J. S., 2011, Stability and correlation properties of microtremor response, Geosciences Journal, 15, 95-103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12303-011-0002-3
  11. Margaryan, S., Yokoi, T., and Hayashi, K., 2009, Experiments on the stability of the spatial autocorrelation method (SPAC) and linear array methods and on the imaginary part of the SPAC coefficients as an indicator of data quality, Exploration Geophysics, 40, 121-131. https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08101
  12. Ohori, M., Nobata, A., and Wakamatsu, K., 2002, A comparison of ESAC and FK methods of estimating phase velocity using arbitrarily shaped microtremor arrays, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92, 2323-2332. https://doi.org/10.1785/0119980109
  13. Okada, H., 2003, The microtremor survey method, Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan, Translated by Koya Suto, Geophysical Monograph Series No. 12, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa.
  14. Salloum, N., Jongmans, D., Cornou, C., Massih, D. Y. A., Chehade, F. H., Voisin, C., and Mariscal, A., 2014, The shear wave velocity structure of the heterogeneous alluvial plain of Beirut (Lebanon): combined analysis of geophysical and geotechnical data, Geophysical Journal International, 199, 894-913. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu294
  15. Yokoi, T., and Margaryan, S., 2008, Consistency of the spatial autocorrelation method with seismic interferometry and its consequence, Geophysical Prospecting, 56, 435-451. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00709.x