DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of cyclic loading and retightening on reverse torque value in external and internal implants

  • Cho, Woong-Rae (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Huh, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 투고 : 2014.12.15
  • 심사 : 2015.06.04
  • 발행 : 2015.08.31

초록

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of cyclic loading and screw retightening on reverse torque value (RTV) in external and internal type implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Cement-retained abutments were connected with 30 Ncm torque to external and internal type implants. Experimental groups were classified according to implant connection type and retightening/loading protocol. In groups with no retightening, RTV was evaluated after cyclic loading for 100,000 cycles. In groups with retightening, RTV was measured after 3, 10, 100 cycles as well as every 20,000 cycles until 100,000 cycles of loading. RESULTS. Every group showed decreased RTV after cyclic loading. Before and after cyclic loading, external type implants had significantly higher RTVs than internal type implants. In external type implants, retightening did not affect the decrease in RTV. In contrast, retightening 5 times and retightening after 10 cycles of dynamic loading was effective for maintaining RTV in internal type implants. CONCLUSION. Retightening of screws is more effective in internal type implants than external type implants. Retightening of screws is recommended in the early stage of functional loading.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Binon PP. Implants and components: entering the new millennium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:76-94.
  2. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23: 2-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02547.x
  3. Pjetursson BE, Thoma D, Jung R, Zwahlen M, Zembic A. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) after a mean observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:22-38.
  4. Jemt T, Laney WR, Harris D, Henry PJ, Krogh PH Jr, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: a 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:29-36.
  5. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PH, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for singletooth replacement: a prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-5.
  6. Khraisat A, Abu-Hammad O, Dar-Odeh N, Al-Kayed AM. Abutment screw loosening and bending resistance of external hexagon implant system after lateral cyclic loading. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:157-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00223.x
  7. Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M. In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 2006;33:75-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01545.x
  8. Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y. Influence of lateral-oblique cyclic loading on abutment screw loosening of internal and external hexagon implants. Dent Mater J 2009;28:373-81. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.373
  9. Theoharidou A, Petridis HP, Tzannas K, Garefis P. Abutment screw loosening in single-implant restorations: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2008;23:681-90.
  10. Bickford JH. An introduction to the design and behavior of bolted joints. 3rd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1995.
  11. Siamos G, Winkler S, Boberick KG. Relationship between implant preload and screw loosening on implant-supported prostheses. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0067:TRBIPA>2.3.CO;2
  12. Guzaitis KL, Knoernschild KL, Viana MA. Effect of repeated screw joint closing and opening cycles on implant prosthetic screw reverse torque and implant and screw thread morphology. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:159-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60115-7
  13. Tzenakis GK, Nagy WW, Fournelle RA, Dhuru VB. The effect of repeated torque and salivary contamination on the preload of slotted gold implant prosthetic screws. J Prosthet Dent 2002;88:183-91. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.127604
  14. Weiss EI, Kozak D, Gross MD. Effect of repeated closures on opening torque values in seven abutment-implant systems. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:194-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.108069
  15. Ricciardi Coppede A, de Mattos Mda G, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF. Effect of repeated torque/mechanical loading cycles on two different abutment types in implants with internal tapered connections: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:624-32.
  16. Andersson B, Odman P, Lindvall AM, Lithner B. Single-tooth restorations supported by osseointegrated implants: results and experiences from a prospective study after 2 to 3 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:702-11.
  17. Artzi Z, Dreiangel A. A screw lock for single-tooth implant superstructures. J Am Dent Assoc 1999;130:677-82. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0277
  18. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000;11:156-8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011S1156.x
  19. Cavazos E, Bell FA. Preventing loosening of implant abutment screws. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:566-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90464-3
  20. Park JK, Choi JU, Jeon YC, Choi KS, Jeong CM. Effects of abutment screw coating on implant preload. J Prosthodont 2010;19:458-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00595.x
  21. McGlumphy EA, Mendel DA, Holloway JA. Implant screw mechanics. Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:71-89.
  22. Haack JE, Sakaguchi RL, Sun T, Coffey JP. Elongation and preload stress in dental implant abutment screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:529-36.
  23. Kim JM, Han JS, Lee SH, Yang JH, Lee JB, Kim YS. A study of screw loosening after dynamic continous fatigue test of several abutment screw. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2003;41: 519-31.
  24. Lee JH, Kim DG, Park CJ, Cho LR. Axial displacements in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:e83-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12062
  25. Kim KS, Lim YJ, Kim MJ, Kwon HB, Yang JH, Lee JB, Yim SH. Variation in the total lengths of abutment/implant assemblies generated with a function of applied tightening torque in external and internal implant-abutment connection. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:834-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02063.x
  26. Cardoso M, Torres MF, Lourenco EJ, de Moraes Telles D, Rodrigues RC, Ribeiro RF. Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23:475-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02165.x
  27. Delben JA, Gomes EA, Barao VA, Assuncao WG. Evaluation of the effect of retightening and mechanical cycling on preload maintenance of retention screws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:251-6.
  28. Binon PP, McHugh MJ. The effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:511-9.

피인용 문헌

  1. Stability of the prosthetic screws of three types of craniofacial prostheses retention systems vol.42, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2016.42.6.352
  2. Comparative study of abutment screw loosening with or without adhesive material vol.9, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2017.9.2.99
  3. Possibility and Limitation of Applying Occlusal Adjustment on Implant Prosthesis similar to Natural Teeth vol.22, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180014
  4. Effect of different angulations and collar lengths of conical hybrid implant abutment on screw loosening after dynamic cyclic loading vol.4, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0149-z
  5. Effect of Abutment Connection Type and Cyclic Loading on Removal Torque Value vol.4, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.29252/jrdms.4.1.36
  6. Removal torque pattern of a combined cone and octalobule index implant-abutment connection at different cyclic loading: an in-vitro experimental study vol.5, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-018-0154-2
  7. Abutment screw loosening in implants: A literature review vol.9, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1343_20
  8. Joint stability of internal conical connection abutments with or without hexagon indexes: an in vitro study vol.36, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.2.95
  9. 임플란트 연결부의 개념과 적용: Part 1. 원추형 내부연결 임플란트의 식립과 보철 vol.36, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2020.36.4.211
  10. Comparison of the Effect of Four Different Abutment Screw Torques on Screw Loosening in Single Implant-Supported Prosthesis after the Application of Mechanical Loading vol.2021, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/3595064