DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Relationship among the Coping Style, Social Support, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Chemotherapy

항암치료 단계 유방암 환자의 대처방식, 사회적지지 및 외상 후 스트레스 장애와의 관계

  • Yang, Seung Kyoung (College of Nursing, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Kim, Eunshim (Gerontological Health Research Center in Institute of Health Sciences)
  • 양승경 (경상대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 김은심 (건강과학연구원 노인건강연구센터)
  • Received : 2014.09.14
  • Accepted : 2015.02.11
  • Published : 2015.03.01

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to examine how patients' coping style and social support affect post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in breast cancer patients who are treated with chemotherapy. Methods: The sample consisted of 134 outpatients who received breast cancer treatments at the cancer clinic of a university hospital. The collected data were analyzed by frequency, percentage, t-test, ANOVA, ${\chi}^2$-test, Pearson correlation coefficients using SPSS for Windows, version 18.0. Results: Among total, 26.9% of patients were classified into a high-risk PTSD group. In the high-risk group, a positive correlation was found between active and passive coping styles and between social support and active coping styles. Conclusion: In this study, the stronger the social support was, the more active the coping style was for high-risk PTSD patients with breast cancer. Considering the fact that cancer requires life-long self-management, strong social support could improve patients' healthcare capability. Furthermore, solid social support could effectively reduce the stress level and improve the quality of life for breast cancer patients in the high-risk PTSD group.

목적: 본 연구는 항암치료 단계 유방암 환자의 PTSD, 대처방식, 사회적 지지의 관계를 파악하여 암환자의 PTSD에 관한 효과적인 간호중재의 기초자료를 제시하기 위함이다. 방법: J시 소재 G지역암센터 외과 외래를 방문한 만 30세 이상이며, 항암치료단계인 유방암 환자134명을 대상으로 조사하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS WIN 18.0프로그램을 이용하여 서술통계, ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficients 등을 실시하였다. 결과: 항암치료 단계 유방암 환자의 외상 후 스트레스 장애는 26.9%가 PTSD 고위험군, 17.9%가 PTSD 위험군에 속하는 것으로 나타났다. 대상자의 PTSD 그룹(고위험군, 위험군, 정상)의 대처방식(적극적 대처, 소극적 대처), 사회적 지지의 상관관계는 PTSD 고위험군인 경우 적극적 대처와 소극적 대처가 유의미한 정적 상관관계를 가지는 것으로 나타났으며, PTSD 고위험군에서 사회적 지지와 적극적 대처는 유의미한 정적 상관관계를 가지고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 항암치료 단계 유방암 환자 중 26.9%가 PTSD 증상을 보이는 것으로 나타났으며, PTSD 고위험군에서 사회적 지지가 증가할수록 적극적 대처가 증가하는 것으로 나타났다. 암은 평생 자기관리가 필요한 질병임을 고려할 때 높은 사회적 지지는 자신의 건강관리 능력을 증진시킬 수 있는 계기가 될 수 있을 것이며, 더 나아가 PTSD 고위험군에게 있어 높은 사회적 지지는 환자의 스트레스를 줄이고 삶의 질을 높이는데 효과적인 역할을 할 것이라 여겨진다.

Keywords

References

  1. Statistics Korea [Internet]. Daejeon: Statistics Korea; c2014. [cited 2014 Sep 9]. Available from: http://www.kostat.go.kr.
  2. National Cancer Information Center [Internet]. Goyang: National Cancer Information Center; c2014. [cited 2014 Sep 9]. Available from: http://www.cancer.go.kr.
  3. Christman NJ. Uncertainty and adjustment during radiotherapy. Nurs Res 1990;39:17-20, 47.
  4. Holland JC, Mastrovito R. Psychologic adaptation to breast cancer. Cancer 1980;46(4 Suppl):1045-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(19800815)46:4+<1045::AID-CNCR2820461331>3.0.CO;2-2
  5. Park EY, Lee EO. Patients with high risk breast cancer. Asian Oncol Nurs 2001;1:32-43.
  6. Jeon MH. Experience of life following breast cancer surgery [dissertation]. Seoul: Seoul Univ.; 1994. Korean.
  7. Jung BR. Adjustment process of women with breast cancer : emotion experiences [dissertation]. Seoul: Yonsei Univ.; 1991. Korean.
  8. Kangas M, Henry JL, Bryant RA. Posttraumatic stress disorder following cancer. A conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Rev 2002;22:499-524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00118-0
  9. Mehnert A, Koch U. Prevalence of acute and post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental disorders in breast cancer patients during primary cancer care: a prospective study. Psychooncology 2007;16:181-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1057
  10. Alter CL, Pelcovitz D, Axelrod A, Goldenberg B, Harris H, Meyers B, et al. Identification of PTSD in cancer survivors. Psychosomatics 1996;37:137-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3182(96)71580-3
  11. Jacobsen PB, Widows MR, Hann DM, Andrykowski MA, Kronish LE, Fields KK. Posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms after bone marrow transplantation for breast cancer. Psychosom Med 1998;60:366-71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-199805000-00026
  12. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York:Springer Pub. Co.:1984.
  13. Compas BE, Malcame VL, Fondacaro KM. Coping with stressful events in order children and young adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol 1998;56:405-11.
  14. Kemp A, Green BL. Incidence and correlates of posttraumatic stress disorder in battered women. J Interpers Violence 1995;10: 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/088626095010001003
  15. Billings AG, Moos RH. Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984;46:877-91. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.877
  16. Rogehr C, Hill J, Kott T, Sault B. Social support, self efficacy and trauma in new recruits and experienced firefighting. Stress Health 2003;19:189-93. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.974
  17. Weiss DS, Marmar CR, Metzler TJ, Ronfeldt HM. Predicting symptomatic distress in emergency services personnel. J Consult Clin Psychol 1995;63:361-8. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.361
  18. Aneshensel CS, Stone JD. Stress and depression: a test of the buffering model of social support. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1982;39: 1392-6. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290120028005
  19. Tae YS. Study on the correlation between perceived social support and depression of the cancer patients [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha womans Univ.; 1986. Korean.
  20. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979;41:209-18. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004
  21. Eun HJ, Kwon TW, Lee SM, Kim TH, Choi MR, Cho SJ. A study on reliability and validity of the korean version of impact of event scale-revised. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2005;44:303-10.
  22. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess, 1988;52:30-41. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2
  23. Shin JS, Lee YB. The effects of social supports on psychosocial well-being of the unemployed. J Korean Soc Welfare 1999;37:241-69.
  24. Ha BY, Jung EJ, Choi SY. Effects of resilience, post-traumatic stress disorder on the quality of life in patients with breast cancer. Korean J Women Health Nurs 2014;20:83-91. https://doi.org/10.4069/kjwhn.2014.20.1.83
  25. Ha YJ. The relationships among self-esteem, anger expression and post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSS) in patients with breast cancer [master's thesis]. Jinju: Gyeongsang Univ.; 2014. Korean.
  26. De Faye BJ, Wilson KG, Chater S, Viola RA, Hall P. Stress and coping with advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care 2006;4:239-49.
  27. Kim EJ. Hospitalization-related stress and coping strategies of colon cancer patients [master's thesis]. Seoul: Ewha Womans Univ.; 2007. Korean.
  28. Kang JY. The influence of stress, spousal support, and resilience on the ways of coping among women with breast cancer [master's thesis]. Seoul: Seoul Univ.; 2012. Korean.
  29. Bae KJ. The effect of social support on the ways of coping of the women damaged by the family violence [master's thesis]. Busan: Busan Univ.; 2006. Korean.

Cited by

  1. A Meta-Analysis of Intervention Research for Posttraumatic Growth in Cancer Patients vol.16, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2016.16.1.9
  2. 여성생식기 암 대상자의 외상 후 성장을 위한 융합적 관련 요인 vol.8, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15207/jkcs.2017.8.10.115
  3. Relationships Among Self-Efficacy, Social Support, and Community Participation in Breast Cancer Survivors vol.27, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14519/kjot.2019.27.4.06
  4. Social integration and inflammation in individuals with and without posttraumatic stress disorder vol.89, pp.None, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.06.013