DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

구순구개열 환자에서 Locator® 유지장치가 장착된 milled titanium bar를 이용한 가철성 임플란트 피개 국소의치의 보철수복증례

Removable implant-supported partial denture using milled bar with Locator® attachments in a cleft lip & palate patient: A clinical report

  • 양상현 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 김경아 (을지대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 김자영 (서남대학교 의과대학 예수병원 치과학교실) ;
  • 서재민 (전북대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과보철학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Yang, Sang-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-A (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Eulji University) ;
  • Kim, Ja-Yeong (Department of Dentistry, Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Seonam College of Medicine) ;
  • Seo, Jae-Min (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry and Institute of Oral Bio-Science, Chonbuk National University)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.31
  • 심사 : 2015.05.07
  • 발행 : 2015.07.31

초록

본 증례는 구순구개열 환자에서 상순의 반흔, 상악 잔존치조제의 과도한 흡수, 협소한 구개 및 상악골의 열성장을 동반한 3급 악간관계로 인해 통상의 가철성 국소의치 수복에 한계를 보이기 때문에 상악 무치악 부위에 4개의 임플란트를 식립 후, CAD/CAM 시스템으로 밀링한 titanium bar를 이용한 상악 가철성 임플란트 피개 국소의치를 계획하였다. 통상의 주조방법은 주조 후 수축을 하게 되지만 CAD/CAM 시스템으로 밀링한 titanium bar는 높은 정밀성과 경제성 그리고 가벼운 장점이 있다. 하지만 실제 임상에서 milled bar는 아주 균등하고 정확한 마찰결합을 얻기 힘들며 의치의 반복적인 착탈에 의해 마찰 유지력이 감소 할 수 있다. 이에 milled bar와 함께 사용할 수 있는 다양한 보조 유지장치(e.g. friction pin, $ERA^{(R)}$, $CEKA^{(R)}$, magnetics, $Locator^{(R)}$ 등)를 같이 사용함으로써 부가적인 유지력, 경제성 및 교체의 용이성 등을 추가적으로 얻을 수 있다. 본 증례에서 milled titanium bar의 상부면에 drill and tapping 방법으로 $Locator^{(R)}$ 유지장치를 연결하였다. milled bar에 screw hole을 형성하고 3개의 $Locator^{(R)}$ 유지장치를 20 Ncm으로 체결하여 추가적인 유지력을 확보하였다. 보철수복 후, 환자가 원하는 심미적인 안모, 저작 기능 및 의치 유지에 만족할 만한 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하고자 한다.

Due to the limitations of conventional removable partial denture prostheses to treat a cleft lip & palate patient who shows scar tissue on upper lip, excessive absorption of the maxillary residual alveolar ridge, and class III malocclusion with narrow palate and undergrowth of the maxilla, 4 implants were placed on the maxillary edentulous region and a maxillary removable implant-supported partial denture was planned using a CAD/CAM milled titanium bar. Unlike metal or gold casting technique which has shrinkage after the molding, CAD/CAM milled titanium bar is highly-precise, economical and lightweight. In practice, however, it is very hard to obtain accurate friction-fit from the milled bar and reduction in retention can occur due to repetitive insertion and removal of the denture. Various auxiliary retention systems (e.g. $ERA^{(R)}$, $CEKA^{(R)}$, magnetics, $Locator^{(R)}$ attachment), in order to deal with these problems, can be used to obtain additional retention, cost-effectiveness and ease of replacement. Out of diverse auxiliary attachments, $Locator^{(R)}$ has characteristics that are dual retentive, minimal in vertical height and convenient of attachment replacement. Drill and tapping method is simple and the replacement of the metal female part of $Locator^{(R)}$ attachment is convenient. In this case, the $Locator^{(R)}$ attachment is connected to the milled titanium bar fabricated by CAD/CAM, using the drill and tapping technique. Afterward, screw holes were formed and 3 $Locator^{(R)}$ attachments were secured with 20 Ncm holding force for additional retention. Following this procedure, satisfactory results were obtained in terms of aesthetic facial form, masticatory function and denture retention, and I hereby report this case.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Baek SH, Yang WS. Clinical study on the anomalies of number and morphology in cleft lip and palate patients'teeth. Korean J Orthod 2001;31:51-61.
  2. Galindo DF. The implant-supported milled-bar mandibular overdenture. J Prosthodont 2001;10:46-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2001.00046.x
  3. Drago C, Howell K. Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses. J Prosthodont 2012;21:413-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00835.x
  4. Sadowsky SJ, Fitzpatrick B, Curtis DA. Evidence-based criteria for differential treatment planning of implant restorations for the maxillary edentulous patient. J Prosthodont 2014;22:319-329
  5. Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:7-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70229-5
  6. Chan MF, Narhi TO, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:7-15.
  7. Lewis S, Sharma A, Nishimura R. Treatment of edentulous maxillae with osseointegrated implants. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:503-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90419-B
  8. Trakas T, Michalakis K, Kang K, Hirayama H. Attachment systems for implant retained overdentures: a literature review. Implant Dent 2006;15:24-34. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.id.0000202419.21665.36
  9. Watson CJ, Tinsley D, Sharma S. Implant complications and failures: the complete overdenture. Dent Update 2001;28:234-8, 240. https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2001.28.5.234
  10. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:195-202. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00369.x
  11. Wismeijer D, van Waas MA, Kalk W. Factors to consider in selecting an occlusal concept for patients with implants in the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 1995;74:380-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80378-6
  12. Oh SC, Han JS, Kim MJ. Implant supported overdenture using milled titanium bar with Locator attachment on fully edentulous maxillae: a case report. J Dent Rehab App Sci 2011;27:223-30.
  13. Kurtzman GM. Lab techniques for use of the locator attachment in bar-overdenture applications. TeamWork 2008;1:72-8.
  14. Kim MS, Yoon MJ, Huh JB, Jeon YC, Jeong CM. Implant overdenture using a locator bar system by drill and tapping technique in a mandible edentulous patient: a case report. J Adv Prosthodont 2012;4:116-20. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.2.116