Earthquakes and Structures

  • 제9권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-27
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2092-7614(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2092-7622(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fragility curves of gravity-load designed RC buildings with regularity in plan

  • Masi, A. (School of Engineering, University of Basilicata) ;
  • Digrisolo, A. (School of Engineering, University of Basilicata) ;
  • Manfredi, V. (School of Engineering, University of Basilicata)
  • 투고 : 2014.08.25
  • 심사 : 2015.02.16
  • 발행 : 2015.07.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper Fragility Curves (FCs) relevant to existing RC framed building types representative of the Italian building population designed only to vertical load and regular in-plan have been derived from an extensive campaign of non-linear dynamic analyses. In the generation of the FCs, damage states according to the EMS98 scale have been considered while the intensity measure has been defined by adopting an integral parameter, such as the Housner intensity. FCs have been generated by varying different parameters, including building age, number of storeys, presence and position of infill panels, plan dimensions, external beams stiffness and concrete strength. In order to verify the effectiveness of the damage prediction, comparisons were made between the results obtained from the proposed FCs with those deriving from both prominent fragility studies available in the technical literature and damage distributions observed in past earthquakes. Results show that damage grades obtained by adopting the proposed FCs are generally lower than those provided by the other approaches considered. A comparison with real damage data, shows that the proposed FCs generally estimate more severe damage distributions than those observed in past earthquakes, although they give lower differences with respect to the other approaches.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ambraseys, N., Smit, P., Douglas, J., Margaris, B., Sigbjornsson, R., Olafsson, S., Suhadolc, P. and Costa, G. (2004), "Internet-site for European strong-motion data", Bollettino di Geofisica Teorica ed Applicata, 45(3), 113-129.
  2. Rojahn, C. and Sharpe, R.L. (1985), "Earthquake damage evaluation data for California", Applied Technology Council.
  3. Baber, T.T. and Noori, M.N. (1985), "Random vibration of degrading pinching systems", J. Eng. Mech., 111(8), 1010-1026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1985)111:8(1010)
  4. Bouc, R. (1967), "Forced vibration of mechanical systems with hysteresis", Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Non-linear Oscillations, Prague.
  5. Braga, F., Dolce, M. and Liberatore, D. (1982), "Southern Italy November 23, 1980 Earthquake: A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the M.S.K.-76 Scale", CNR-PFG n.503, Roma.
  6. Braga, F., Manfredi, V., Masi, A., Salvatori, A. and Vona, M. (2011), "Performance of non-structural elements in RC buildings during the L'Aquila, 2009 earthquake", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 9(1), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9205-7
  7. Calvi, G.M. and Bolognini, D. (2001), "Seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with weakly reinforced masonry panels", J. Earthq. Eng., 5(2), 153-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460109350390
  8. Calvi, G.M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J.J., Restrepo-Velez, L.F. and Crowley, H. (2006), "Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years", ISET J. Earthq. Technol., 43(3), 75-104.
  9. Celik, O.C. and Ellingwood, B.R. (2009), "Seismic risk assessment of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames subjected to Mid-America ground motions", J. Struct. Eng., 135(4), 414-424. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:4(414)
  10. Chiauzzi, L., Masi, A., Mucciarelli, M., Vona, M., Pacor, F., Cultrera, G., Gallovic, F. and Emolo, A. (2012), "Building damage scenarios based on exploitation of Housner intensity derived from finite faults ground motion simulations", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 10(2), 517-545. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9309-8
  11. Coburn, A. and Spence, R. (2002), Earthquake Protection, Second Edition, J. Wiley & Sons.
  12. Colangelo, F. (2005), "Pseudo-dynamic seismic response of reinforced concrete frames infilled with non-structural brick masonry", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(10), 1219-1241. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.477
  13. Colombi, M., Borzi, B., Crowley, H., Onida, M., Meroni, F. and Pinho, R. (2008), "Deriving vulnerability curves using Italian earthquake damage data", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 6(3), 485-504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-008-9073-6
  14. Crowley, H., Pinho, R. and Bommer, J.J. (2004), "A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 2(8), 173-219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-004-2290-8
  15. D'Ayala, D., Kappos, A., Crowley, H., Antoniadis, P., Colombi, M., Kishali, E., Panagopoulos, G. and Silva, V. (2012), "Providing building vulnerability data and analytical fragility functions for PAGER, Final Technical Report", Earthq. Eng. Research Institute, May 2012.
  16. Dolce, M., Kappos, A., Masi, A., Penelis, G. and Vona, M. (2006), "Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies", Eng. Struct., 28(3), 357-371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.009
  17. FEMA-NIBS (1999), "Earthquake loss estimation methodology", HAZUS99 Technical Manual, Vol. 1-3, Washington DC.
  18. Freeman, S.A. (1998), "Development and use of capacity spectrum method", Proceedings of 6th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Seattle, Washington, USA.
  19. Ghobarah, A., Aziz, T. and Abou-Elfath, H. (1999), "Softening effects on the seismic response of non ductile concrete frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 3(1), 59-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469909350340
  20. Grunthal, G. (1998), "European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98)", European Seismological Commission, sub commission on Engineering Seismology, working Group Macroseismic Scales, Conseil de l'Europe, Cahiers du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie, Vol. 15, Luxembourg.
  21. Hak, S., Morandi, P., Magenes, G. and Sullivan, T.J. (2012), "Damage control for clay masonry infills in the design of RC frame structures", J. Earthq. Eng., 16(S1), 1-35.
  22. Housner, G.W. (1952), "Intensity of ground motion during strong earthquakes", Second technical report, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
  23. Jeong, S-H. and Elnashai, A.S. (2006), "Fragility analysis of buildings with plan irregularities", 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering (4ICEE), No. 145, Taipei, Taiwan.
  24. Kappos, A.J., Panagopoulos, G., Panagiotopoulos, C. and Penelis, G. (2006), "Hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 4(4), 391-413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0
  25. Kunnath, K.S., Hoffmann, G., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1995a), "Gravity load designed RC buildings - part I: seismic evaluation of existing construction", ACI Struct. J., 92(3), 343-354.
  26. Kunnath, K.S., Hoffmann, G., Reinhorn, A.M. and Mander, J.B. (1995b), "Gravity load designed RC buildings - part II: evaluation of detailing enhancements", ACI Struct. J., 92(4), 470-478.
  27. Kwon, O. and Elnashai, A. (2006), "The effect of material and ground motion uncertainty on the seismic vulnerability curves of RC structure", Eng. Struct., 28(2), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.07.010
  28. Lagomarsino, S. and Giovinazzi, S. (2006), "Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 4(4), 415-443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z
  29. Liu, A. and Park, R. (2000), "Seismic behaviour of existing moment-resisting frames with plain round reinforcing bars designed to pre 1970s codes", Proceedings of 12th world conference of earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zealand.
  30. Lungu, D., Aldea, A., Arion, A., Vacareanu, R., Petrescu, F. and Cornea, T. (2001), "RISK-UE, An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns", WP1 Report: European distinctive features, inventory database and typology.
  31. Mainstone, R.J. (1974), "Supplementary note on the stiffness and strength of infilled frames", Current Paper CP13/74, Building Research Establishment, London.
  32. Manfredi, V. and Masi, A. (2014), "Combining in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour of masonry infills in the seismic analysis of RC buildings", Earthq. Struct., 6(5), 457-472. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.457
  33. Masi, A., Dolce, M. and Caterina, F. (1997), "Seismic response of irregular multi-storey building structures with flexible inelastic diaphragms", Int. J. Struct. Des. Tall Build., 6(2), 99-124. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1794(199706)6:2<99::AID-TAL81>3.0.CO;2-X
  34. Masi, A., Dolce, M. and Goretti, A. (2000), "Analogie nel comportamento sismico di edifici in muratura di buona qualita e edifici in c.a.", Ingegneria Sismica, 3. (in Italian)
  35. Masi, A. (2003), "Seismic vulnerability assessment of gravity load designed RC frames", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 1(3), 371-395. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BEEE.0000021426.31223.60
  36. Masi, A., Vona, M. and Mucciarelli, M. (2011), "Selection of natural and synthetic accelerograms for seismic vulnerability studies on RC frames", J. Struct. Eng., 137(3), 367-378. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000209
  37. Masi, A. and Vona, M. (2012), "Vulnerability assessment of gravity-load designed RC buildings: evaluation of seismic capacity trough non linear dynamic analyses", Eng. Struct., 45, 257-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.06.043
  38. Masi, A., Santarsiero, G. and Nigro, D. (2013), "Cyclic tests on external RC beam-column joints: role of seismic design level and axial load value on the ultimate capacity", J. Earthq. Eng., 17(1), 110-136. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2012.707345
  39. Masi, A., Digrisolo, A. and Santarsiero, G. (2014), "Concrete strength variability in Italian RC buildings: Analysis of a large data base of core tests", Appl. Mech. Mater., 597, 283-290. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.597.283
  40. Milutinovic, Z.V. and Trendafiloski, G.S. (2003), "WP4: Vulnerability of current buildings", RISK-UE-An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns.
  41. Mosalam, K.M., Ayala, G., White, R.N. and Roth, C. (1997), "Seismic fragility of LRC frames with and without masonry infill walls", J. Earthq. Eng., 1(4), 693-719. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469708962384
  42. Mucciarelli, M., Masi, A., Vona, M., Gallipoli, M.R., Harabaglia, P., Caputo, R., Piscitelli, S., Rizzo, E., Picozzi, M., Albarello, D. and Lizza, C. (2003), "Quick survey of the possible causes of damage enhancement observed in San Giuliano after the 2002 Molise, Italy seismic sequence", J. Earthq. Eng., 7(4), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460309350466
  43. Onose, J-I. (1982), "Prediction of damage ratio of reinforced concrete buildings due to earthquakes and comparison with actual damage ratio", Proceedings of the 6th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium: Japan Society of Civil Engineers, Tokyo.
  44. Orsini, G. (1999), "A model for buildings' vulnerability assessment using the parameterless scale of seismic intensity (PSI)", Earthq. Spectra, 15(3), 463-483. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586053
  45. Pampanin, S., Calvi, G.M. and Moratti, M. (2002), "Seismic behaviour of R.C. beam-column joints designed for gravity loads", Proceedings of 12th European conference on earthquake engineering, London, UK.
  46. Park, Y.J., Ang, A.H.S. and Wen, Y.K. (1987a), "Damage limiting aseismic design of buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 3(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585416
  47. Park, Y.J., Reinhorn, A.M. and Kunnath, S.K. (1987b), "IDARC: inelastic damage analysis of frame shearwall structures", Technical Report NCEER 87-0008, Buffalo, NY.
  48. Polese, M., Verderame, G.M., Mariniello, C., Iervolino, I. and Manfredi, G. (2008), "Vulnerability analysis for gravity load designed RC buildings in Naples - Italy", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(S2), 234-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802014147
  49. Rossetto, T. and Elnashai, A.S. (2003), "Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data", Eng. Struct., 25(10), 1241-1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00060-9
  50. Sieberg, A. (1930) "Geologie der Erdbeben", Handbuch der Geophysik, 2(4), 550-555. (in German)
  51. Silva, V., Crowley, H., Pinho, R. and Varum, H. (2013), "Extending displacement-based earthquake loss assessment (DBELA) for the computation of fragility curves", Eng. Struct., 56, 343-356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.04.023
  52. Singhal, A. and Kiremidjian, A.S. (1997), "A method for earthquake motion-damage relationships with application to reinforced concrete frames", State University of New York at Buffalo: National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research Report NCEER-97-0008.
  53. Stratta, J.L., Escalante, L.E., Krinitzsky, E.L. and Morelli, U. (1981). "Earthquake in Campania-Basilicata, Italy November 23, 1980 - A Reconnaissance Report", National Research Council and Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
  54. SYNER-G, Deliverable D 3.1 (2011), "Fragility functions for common RC building types in Europe", Aristole University of Thessaloniki.
  55. UNFPA (2011), "The State of World Population 2011, Report of the Information and External Relations Division of UNFPA", (United Nations Population Fund), On line at: http://foweb.unfpa.org/SWP2011/reports/EN-SWOP2011-FINAL.pdf.
  56. Valles, R.E., Reinhorn, A.M., Kunnath, S.K., Li, C. and Madan, A. (1996), "Idarc 2d Version 4.0: a program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings", Technical Report NCEER 96-0010. Buffalo, NY.
  57. Yakut, A. (2004), "Reinforced concrete frame construction", World Housing Encyclopedia-Summary Publication.

피인용 문헌

  1. Consistency of analysis methods considered in EC8-3 for the seismic assessment of RC existing buildings vol.15, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0070-x
  2. Seismic response of RC buildings during the Mw 6.0 August 24, 2016 Central Italy earthquake: the Amatrice case study 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0277-5
  3. Seismic Strengthening and Energy Efficiency: Towards an Integrated Approach for the Rehabilitation of Existing RC Buildings vol.8, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings8030036
  4. A transferable remote sensing approach to classify building structural types for seismic risk analyses: the case of Val d'Agri area (Italy) vol.17, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00648-7
  5. Displacement-Based Simplified Seismic Loss Assessment of Pre-70S RC Buildings vol.24, pp.suppl1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2020.1716890
  6. Towards the updated Italian seismic risk assessment: exposure and vulnerability modelling vol.19, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-021-01065-5
  7. Requalification of RC Frame Apartment Buildings: Comparison of Seismic Retrofit Solutions Based on a Multi-Criteria Approach vol.13, pp.17, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13179962