DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

근거리 동일 시력에서 연령에 따른 농약 제품 표시 글자의 가독성 평가

Legibility Evaluation of Words Used in Pesticide Products According to Age in Same Near Visual Acuity

  • 황해영 (경운대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 송영웅 (대구가톨릭대학교 산업보건학과)
  • 투고 : 2015.04.19
  • 심사 : 2015.06.05
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30

초록

This study tried to investigate the difference of the legibility in different age groups (young and old) with same near visual acuity and to provide preliminary guidelines for the text sizes in the pesticides products based on the legibility experiments. To achieve the objective, legibility evaluation experiments were conducted to test the effects of different age(20s, 50-60s), gender, font type(thick gothic-type and fine gothic-type), thickness (plain and bold), and number of syllables(2 and 3 syllables) in the same near visual acuity(0.6). The results showed that legibility 50s was higher than 20s. And 20s are appealed higher discomfort than 50s. Considering these experimental results, it was recommended that the 14 pt or larger characters (100% readable size) should be used the important information such as toxicity, and the minimum character size was 7 pt (50% readable size) for other information.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kashani S., Mearza A. A., and Claoue C.(2008), "Refractive lens exchange for presbyopia", Contact Lens & Anterior Eye, 31(3): 117-121 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2008.03.005
  2. Kirchner C, Peterson R(1979), "The latest data on visual disability from NCHS." Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 73: 151-157
  3. Akutsu H, Legge GE, Ross JA, Schuebel KJ.(1991), "Psychophysics of reading: x. effects of age related changes in vision." Journal of Gerontology. 46(6):325-331. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronj/46.6.P325
  4. McMonnies CW(1999). "Chart construction and letter legibility/readability." Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 19(6):498-506. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1475-1313.1999.00460.x
  5. Statistics Korea(2010), "2009 Survey report of agriculture."
  6. Laviers HR, Omar F, Jecha H, Kassim G, Gilbert C(2010), "Presbyopic spectacle coverage, willingness to pay for near correction, and the impact of correcting uncorrected presbyopia in adults in Zanzibar." East Africa. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 51(2):1234-1241 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-3154
  7. Hyun-Ju Lee, Seo-Hye Woo, Eun-Young Park, Hye-Young Suh, Seung-Chul Baek(2007), "A study on the readability of web interface for the elderly user." Journal of Korean Society of Design Science, 20(3): 315-324.
  8. Shin-Hae Jeung, Jeong-Sik Son, Hae-Young Hwang, Seong-Kun Kim, Dong-Sik Yu(2013), "Preference and readability of hangul fonts in the presbyopic age." J. Korean Oph. Opt. Soc, 18(2): 149-156. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.2.149
  9. Chang-Wook Lim, Hae-Young Hwang, Young-Woong Song(2011), "Legibility evaluation of the safety and health information used in pesticides." Journal of Korea Safety Management & Science, 13(3): 29-35.
  10. Bernard, M., Liao, C. and Mills, M.(2001), "The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults." Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 175-176.
  11. In-Seok Lee, Seung-Min Mo, Yong-Ku Kong, Young-Woong Song, Myung-Chul Jung(2009), "Eualuation of Main Factors Affecting on the Legibility of One-Syllable Korean Characters and Numbers.", Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 28(4): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2009.28.4.001
  12. Young-Woong Song, Chang-Wook Lim, In-Seok Lee, Myung-chul Jung, Seung-Min Mo, Yong-Ku Kong(2009), "Effects of the Syllable Number, Font Type, Color Contrast, Display Type, Letter Size and Age Group on the Lebibility of the Korean Characters." Journal of the Korean Society of Safety, 24(5): 92-100