References
- Albe, V. (2008). When scientific knowledge, daily life experience, epistemological and social considerations intersect: Students' argumentation in group discussion on a socio-scientific issue. Research in Science Education, 38, 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9040-2
- Brown, J., & Isaacs, D. (2008). The world cafe: Awakening collective intelligence and committed action, In M. Tovey (Ed.). Collective intelligence: Creating a prosperous world at peace (pp. 47-54). Oakton, Virginia: Earth Intelligence Network.
- Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students' decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues(SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 30(7), 887-900.
- Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S.-W. & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670-697. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20424
- Chung, Y., Yoo, J., Kim, S., Lee, H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2014). Enhancing students' communication skills in the science classroom through socioscientific issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education. Online publication.
- Dawson, V. M., & Venville, G. (2010). Teaching strategies for developing students' argumentation skills about socioscientific issues in high school genetics. Research in Science Education, 40, 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9104-y
- Dillenbourg, P. (1999). What do you mean by collaborative learning? In p. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1-9). Oxford: Elsevier.
- Dreyfus, A., & Roth, Z. (1991). Twelfth-grade biology pupils' opinions on interventions of man in nature: Agreement, indifference and ambivalence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280108
- Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academies press.
- Heo, H., Lim, K., Seo, J., & Kim, Y. (2011). Developing 21st century teaching and learning activities for supporting future school 1: Modeling 21st century learner competencies and teacher competencies (KR 2011-2). Korea Education and Research Information Service.
- Hogan, K. (2002). Small groups' ecological reasoning while making an environmental management decision. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 341-368. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10025
- Lee, H., Choi, Y., & Ko, Y. (2014). Designing collective intelligence-based instructional models for teaching socioscientific issues. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(6), 523-534. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.6.0523
- Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, K., Kim, S., Krajcik, J., Herman, B. C., & Zeidler, D. L. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079-2113. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.749546
- Lee, J., Jeon, J., Huh, K., Hong, W., & Kim, M. (2009). Redesigning elementary and secondary school curriculum for developing future koreans' core competences (RRC 2009-10-1). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Lee, Y., & Lee, S. (2009). Conceptual design principles of collective intelligence. Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4), 213-239.
- Levy, P. (1997). Collective intelligence: Mankind's emerging world in cyberspace. Perseus Books.
- Mun, K., Lee, H., Kim, S., Choi, K., Choi, S., & Krajcik, J. S. (2015). Cross-cultural comparison of perceptions on the global scientific literacy with Australian, Chinese, and Korean middle school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 437-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9492-y
- National Research Council [NRC] (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Ratcliffe, M. (1997). Pupil decision-making about socio-scientific issues within the science curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 167-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069970190203
- Roth, W. M. (2003). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270210134600
- Roth, W. M. & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263-294. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10113
- Sadler, T. D., Barab, S. A. & Scott, B. (2007). What do students gain by engaging in socioscientific inquiry? Research in Science Education, 37(4), 371-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-006-9030-9
- Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20042
- Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies and nations. NY: Random House.
- Tapscott, D. & Williams, A. D. (2006). Wikinomics: How mass collaboration changes everything. New York: Portfolio.
- Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Yang, M. (2011). Exploring the principles of collaborative learning for realization of collective intelligence. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(2), 457-483.
- Zeidler, D. L., & Nichols, B. H. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173684
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Cited by
- Development of an Analytical Framework for Dialogic Argumentation in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: Based on Discourse Clusters and Schemes vol.35, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.3.0509
- Science Teachers Taking their First Steps toward Teaching Socioscientific Issues through Collaborative Action Research pp.1573-1898, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9614-6
- 과학기술 관련 사회쟁점 교육을 위한 교과교육학적 지식(SSI-PCK) 요소에 대한 탐색 vol.36, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0539
- 합리적 문제해결을 저해하는 인지편향과 과학교육을 통한 탈인지편향 방법 탐색 vol.36, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.6.0935
- 디지털스토리텔링 활동 기반 과학관련 사회쟁점 수업의 교육적 효과에 대한 인식 탐색 vol.37, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.1.0181
- 과학관련 사회쟁점(SSI) 토론 수업에서 스마트 기기의 활용 방식과 수업의 특징 vol.37, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.5.787
- 고등학생들의 과학적 역량에 있어서 과학수업 활동과 학습동기의 역할 -경로모형의 검증- vol.38, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.3.407
- 플립러닝 기반 SSI 수업이 중학생의 과학기술 사회 시민으로서의 역량 및 인성 함양에 미치는 효과 vol.38, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.4.467
- 중학생의 창의적 문제해결력과 협업 능력 함양을 위한 바느질실습 프로그램 개발 및 적용 vol.30, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2018.09.30.3.195
- The development and validation of the GI-ALE instructional model for the emerging collective intelligence of the scientifically gifted student vol.5, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-019-0046-7
- PCK에 근거한 초등학교 교사의 과학영재수업과 발명영재수업 구성과 실천의 특징 비교 vol.39, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2020.39.3.338