Case Report of Sacrum Malposition Analysed by Relative Research of Test

검사법의 비교연구로 살펴본 천골변위 증례보고

  • Kim, Gyu-Sub (Daegu Kyungpook, Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves) ;
  • Kang, Woo-Jin (Daegu Kyungpook, Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves) ;
  • Moon, Ik-Ryoul (Daegu Kyungpook, Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves) ;
  • Park, Jae-Sung (Daegu Kyungpook, Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves) ;
  • Jeon, Jun-Hyeon (Daegu Kyungpook, Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves) ;
  • Jeong, Won-Choon (Daegu Kyungpook, Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves) ;
  • Heo, Su-Young (Daegu Kyungpook, Korean Society of Chuna Manual Medicine for Spine & Nerves)
  • 김규섭 (척추신경추나의학회 대구경북지회) ;
  • 강우진 (척추신경추나의학회 대구경북지회) ;
  • 문익렬 (척추신경추나의학회 대구경북지회) ;
  • 박재성 (척추신경추나의학회 대구경북지회) ;
  • 전준현 (척추신경추나의학회 대구경북지회) ;
  • 정원춘 (척추신경추나의학회 대구경북지회) ;
  • 허수영 (척추신경추나의학회 대구경북지회)
  • Received : 2015.05.08
  • Accepted : 2015.06.10
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study is to find out the relation between Orthopedic Test of sacroiliac joint and two Sacrum Malposition Tests. Methods : We investigated 56 cases of patients who complained of unilateral sacroiliac joint pain and were diagnosed as sacrum malposition. We used Gaenslen's Test, Sacroiliac Resisted Abduction Test and Patric's Test as Orthopedic Test for pain area, while used Thompson's Sacrum Test and Greenman's 4 Point Test for diagnosis of sacrum malposition. Results : P-value was 0.511 between Thompson's Sacrum Test and Greenman's 4 Point Test within negative Orthopedic Test, and was 0.523 within positive Orthopedic Test(p>0.05) Conclusions : The results suggested that the Thompson's Sacrum Test was not statistically correlation with Greenman's 4 Point Test within negative Orthopedic Test, and was not correlated within positive Orthopedic Test.

Keywords

References

  1. 척추신경추나의학회. 추나의학. 2판. 서울:척추신경추나의학회. 2014:43, 80-1, 173, 183-5.
  2. Cox JM. 유성렬역. Low Back Pain. 서울:푸른솔. 1997:220, 223-4, 231.
  3. Isaacs ER, Bookhout MR. 대한척추교정물리치료학회역. Bourdillon의 척추교정물리치료학. 6판. 서울:영문출판사. 2004:57-8, 71, 79, 81-93, 151-66, 285-91.
  4. Ward RC. 척추신경추나의학회 역 . Osteopathy 의학의 기초. 서울:척추신경추나의학회. 1999:693-8.
  5. 윤홍일, 심현보. 천장관절 기능부전에 대한 검사방법들의 진단적 가치, 정형도수적 평가를 중심으로. 대한정형도수치료학회지. 2010 ;16(1):64-76.
  6. Thompson JC. Thompson Technique Reference Manual. Elgin:Williams Manufacturing. 1990:77-9.
  7. Greenman PE. 대한정형물리치료학회역. Greenman의 정형물리치료학. 2판. 서울:영문출판사. 2001:26, 169, 308-9, 316, 321-5, 328-9.
  8. Cipriano JJ. 김인상역. 정형외과테스트법. 서울:일중사. 1992:88, 94-5, 110-1.
  9. DiGiovanna EL, Schiowitz S, Dowling DJ. 대한척추교정학회역. 정골의학 도수치료기법의 완성. 3판. 서울:영문출판사. 2008:376-84.
  10. Nye Z, Lavelle JM, Laven R, Mayer SM, Halajian EB. 척추신경추나의학회역. 정골의학 핵심정리. 서울:척추신경추나의학회. 2015:96-109.
  11. Richard R. Osteopathic Lesions of The Sacrum. New York:Thorsons Publishers. 1986:32-47.
  12. Upledger JE, Vredevoogd JD. 척추신경추나의학회역. 두개.천골치료법 I. 서울:척추신경추나의학회. 1998:17-9.
  13. Hoppenfeld S. 김형묵역. 척추사지검진 ATLAS. 서울:고려의학. 1989:262.
  14. Kapandji IA. 신문균 외 공역. 임상운동학과 기능해부학을 위한 관절생리학(체간척주). 3 판. 서울:현문사. 1998:54.