Journal of Environmental Health Sciences (한국환경보건학회지)

Korean Society of Environmental Health (한국환경보건학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Filtration Performance Efficiency of Commercial Cloth Masks

시판되고 있는 유사마스크 제품의 여과효율성능 비교평가

  • Received : 2015.05.13
  • Accepted : 2015.06.19
  • Published : 2015.06.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate the filtration efficiencies and pressure drops of five commercial cloth masks (4 plate type, 1 cup type) in comparison to the performance of a class 1 disposable respirator (reference respirator). A further objective was to evaluate the effects of the number of layers and wash treatment independently on filtration efficiencies and pressure drops. Methods: Polydisperse NaCl aerosols were generated in an aerosol chamber and their concentrations were measured by an optical particle counter (OPC) in the size range of $0.3{\sim}10{\mu}m$ (five channels). Results: The filtration efficiencies of the five cloth masks and the reference respirator were D: 9.5%, C: 18.5%, E: 23.6%, A: 28.5%, B: 29.7% and R: 91.1%, respectively, and the pressure drops through them were C, D: 0.8 Pa, E: 1.7 Pa, B: 6.4 Pa, A: 42.7 Pa and R: 19.3 Pa, respectively. The filtration efficiencies of the cloth masks and reference respirator were below the class 1 respirator criterion (${\geq}94.0%$) of the Ministry of Employment and Labor (MOEL) and Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS). The pressure drops satisfied the class 1 respirator criterion (${\leq}70Pa$) of MOEL and MFDS. When the cloth masks were folded into two and four layers, the filtration efficiencies of cloth masks A, B, C, D (plate type) increased 1.7-4.6 times, and 2.3-6.8 times, respectively, compared to the efficiencies of the same products in a single layer. Pressure drops increased as the number of layers was increased. The filtration efficiency of cloth mask E with a liner was 1.3 times higher than that of the same mask without a liner, and the pressure drop was lower in the no-liner configuration. After a single washing, the filtration efficiencies of all the cloth mask products decreased 1.04-4.0 times compared to those of the same products intact. For the cloth masks C and E, their filtration efficiencies were significantly decreased after washing (p<0.05). The pressure drops of all cloth masks were 1.2-2.0 times lower after washing. Conclusions: The filtration efficiencies of the five cloth masks were below 30% and did not improve greatly by increasing the number of layers. After a single washing, their performances decreased. Considering the above and other issues identified with cloth masks, such as poor fit and stretched fibers through use, people should not expect protection against particulate matters from the cloth masks on the market.

Keywords

References

  1. Balzy A, Toivola M, Reponen T, Podgorski A, Zimmer A, Grinshpun SA. Manikin-based performance evaluation of N95 filtering-facepiece respirators challenged with nanoparticles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2006; 50: 259-269.
  2. Checchi L, Montevecchi M, Moreschi A, Graziosi F, Taddei P, Violante FS. Efficacy of three face masks in preventing inhalation of airborne contaminants in dental practice. J Am Dent Assoc. 2005; 136: 877-882. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0288
  3. Cho HW, Yoon CS. Workplace field testing of the pressure drop of particulate respirators using welding fumes. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012; 56: 948-958. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes015
  4. Han DH. Performance of respirator filters using quality factor in Korea. Indust Health. 2000. 38: 380-384. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.38.380
  5. Han DH. Protection against aerosols by particulate respirators and fit performance. Korean Journal of Environmental Health Sciences. 2001; 27: 30-36.
  6. Hong Y. Functional finishing of nonwoven filter for dust-proof/medical masks by corona discharging treatment. Textile Coloration and Finishing. 2013; 25: 232-239. https://doi.org/10.5764/TCF.2013.25.3.232
  7. Hong YJ, Lee JS, Shin JM, Lee CY, Han EJ, Lee HK et al. Evaluation of the quality of commercial masks. The Report of Seoul Metropolitan Government Research Institute of Public Health and Environment. 2009; 45: 66-76.
  8. Huang SH, Chen CW, Kuo YM, Lai CY, Mckay R, Chen CC. Factors affecting filter penetration and quality factor of particulate respirators. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2013; 13: 162-171.
  9. Jung H, Kim J, Lee S, Lee J, Kim J, Tsai P, Yoon C. Comparison of filtration efficiency and pressure drop in anti-yellow sand masks, quarantine masks, medical masks, general masks, and handkerchiefs. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2014; 14: 991-1002.
  10. Kim KR. Respirator efficiency for bacteria and viruses. Laboratory Safety. 2008; 1: 52-58
  11. Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. Guide to use of particulate respirators(KOSHA GUIDE H-82-2012). Ulsan: Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency. 2012.
  12. Lee BU, Yermakov M, Grinshpun SA. Filtering efficiency of N95- and R95-type facepiece respirators, dust-mist facepiece respirator, and surgical mask operating in unipolarly ionized indoor air environments. Aerosol Air Qual Res. 2005; 5: 25-38.
  13. Lee JB, Lee MC, Ahn GS, Heo HR, Jung G, Kim JH et al. Evaluation on the dust removal efficiency of mask for asian dust. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment. 2007; 467-468.
  14. Lee KW, Liu BYH. On the minimum efficiency and the most penetrating particle size for fibrous filters. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1980; 30: 377-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00022470.1980.10464592
  15. Lee SA, Grinshpun SA, Reponen T. Respiratory performance offered by N95 respirators and surgical masks: human subject evaluation with NaCl aerosol representing bacterial and viral particle size range. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008; 52: 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men005
  16. Li L, Zuo Z, Japuntich DA, Pui DYH. Evaluation of filter media for particle number, surface area and mass penetrations. Ann Occup Hyg. 2012; 56: 581-594.
  17. Medina DE. Filtration performance of a NIOSHapproved N95 filtering facepiece respirator with stapled head straps. [Tampa]: University of South Florida; 2010.
  18. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. MFDS, Provide sectoral safety information about preparation for particulate matter. Available: http://www.mfds.go.kr/index.do?x=0&searchkey=title:contents&mid=675&searchword=%B9%CC%BC%BC%B8%D5%C1%F6&y=0&pageNo=1&seq=22476&cmd=v [accessed 14 May 2015].
  19. Oberg T, Brosseau LM. Surgical mask filter and fit performance. Am J Infect Control. 2008; 36: 276-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2007.07.008
  20. Penconek A, Drazyk P, Moskal A. Penetration of diesel exhaust particles through commercially available dust half masks. Ann Occup Hyg. 2013; 57: 360-373. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/mes074
  21. Rengasamy S, Eimer BC, Shaffer RE. Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSHapproved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators. Ann Occup Hyg. 2009; 53: 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/men086
  22. Rengasamy S, Eimer B, Shaffer RE. Simple respiratory protection-evaluation of the filtration performance of cloth masks and common fabric materials against 20-1000 nm size particles. Ann Occup Hyg. 2010; 54: 789-798. https://doi.org/10.1093/annhyg/meq044
  23. Sanchez E. Filtration efficiency of surgical masks. [Tampa]: University of South Florida; 2010.
  24. Shin CS. Performance standards of yellow sand masks. Seoul: Korea's Ministry of Food and Drug Safety. 2008.
  25. Sinclair D. Penetration of hepa filters by submicron aerosols. J Aerosol Sci. 1976; 7: 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(76)90073-2
  26. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. NIOSH guide to the selection and use of particulate respirators certified under 42 CFR 84. Rosenstock L, MD: Author. NIOSH Publication No. 96-101. 1996.