한국환경생태학회지 (Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology)

  • 제29권3호
  • /
  • Pages.391-400
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1229-3857(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-131X(eISSN)
한국환경생태학회 (Korean Society of Environment and Ecology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

얕은 습지에서 환경 요인에 따른 어류상 분포 특성

Distribution Dynamics of Fish Community in Shallow Wetland by Environmental Variables

  • Choi, Jong-Yun (National Institute of Ecology) ;
  • Jo, Hyunbin (Dept. of Biological Sciences, Pusan National Univ.) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Ki (Dept. of Biological Sciences, Pusan National Univ.) ;
  • La, Geung-Hwan (Dept. of Environmental Education, Sunchon National Univ.) ;
  • Joo, Gea-Jae (Dept. of Biological Sciences, Pusan National Univ.)
  • 투고 : 2015.01.06
  • 심사 : 2015.06.11
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

얕은 습지에서 환경 요인에 대한 어류의 분포와 종 조성을 평가하기 위해, 2012년 봄철(5~6월)에 경상남도에 위치한 24개의 습지에서 이화학적 요인, 수생식물, 어류 등을 조사하였다. 조사 기간 동안 20종의 어류가 동정되었으며, 잉어과 어류가 가장 우점하는 것으로 나타났다. 이화학적 요인 및 수생식물 생물량은 조사 지점에 따라 상이하였으며, 특히 수생식물 생물량은 어류 풍부도와 매우 밀접하게 관련되었다(df=1, F=32.00, P=0.001). 조사 지점간에 군집분석을 수행한 결과, 조사 지점들은 3개의 집단으로 구분되었으며, 이 또한 수생식물 생물량에 대한 영향으로 분석되었다. 첫 번째 집단의 습지에서는 검정우럭과 어류인 블루길에 의해서 우점되었으며, 그 외 어류 군집은 거의 출현하지 않았다. 두 번째 집단은 주로 잉어과 어류인 붕어가 우점한다는 점에서 첫 번째 집단과 차이를 보였다. 세 번째 집단에 속한 습지에서는 첫 번째 집단과 비슷하게, 블루길이 우점하였으나, 다른 어류 종 또한 다양하게 출현하였다. 결론적으로 얕은 습지에서 어류 군집의 분포와 종 다양성은 수생식물의 생물량에 의해 강하게 영향 받는 것으로 평가되었으며, 수생식물의 높은 생물량은 어류의 높은 풍부도 유지에 크게 기여하였다. 이러한 관점에서 습지를 복원하거나 새롭게 조성할 때 수생식물의 적절한 식재는 어류의 종 다양성에 영향을 줄 것으로 보이며, 어류가 수생태 먹이망 내에서 최상위포식자로서의 역할을 한다는 점을 감안할 때 먹이망의 건강성 유지에도 필수적일 것으로 사료된다.

In order to investigate the distribution and species composition of fish in shallow wetlands that might be affected by environmental factors, we investigated the physicochemical parameters, macrophytes biomass, and fish assemblage in 24 shallow wetlands in South Korea from May to June, 2012. In this study, a total of 20 fish species were identified, and Cypinidae were found to be the most dominant species. Physicochemical parameters and macrophyte biomass were different in the survey sites, and macrophytes biomass, in particular, showed a positive relationship with fish abundance in stepwise multiple regression (df=1, F=32.00, P=0.001). According to the result of the cluster analysis between survey sites, the survey sites were divided into three groups in accordance with species composition of fish in relation to macrophytes biomass. In the wetlands of the first group, Lepomis macrochirus which belongs to Centrarchidae was found to be dominant and other fish assemblages were hardly seen. In the second group, unlike the first group, Carassius auratus that belongs to Cypinidae was found to be dominant. In the third group, Lepomis macrochirus was found to be as dominant as the first group but various other fish species appeared. Where there was abundance of the main food sources (i. e. zooplankton) of fish in the survey sites, there were more diverse macrophyte biomass. Consequently, it is proven that macrophytes strongly affect the species composition and abundance of fish, and high biomass of macrophytes support high assemblage of fish. Based on these results, we recommend establishing diverse aquatic macrophytes communities when restoring or creating wetlands to assure high diversity of fish species that use macrophytes as their habitat.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brinson, M.M., A.E. Lugo and S. Brown(1981) Primary productivity, decomposition and consumer activity in freshwater wetlands. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 12: 123-161. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.12.110181.001011
  2. Burks, R.L., D.M. Lodge, E. Jeppesen and T.L. Lauridsen(2002) Diel horizontal migration of zooplankton: costs and benefits of inhabiting the littoral. Freshwater Biol. 47: 343-365. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00824.x
  3. Casatti, L., H.F. Mendes, K.M. Ferreira(2003) Aquatic macrophytes as feeding site for small fishes in the Rosana Reservoir, Paranapanema River, Southeastern Brazil. Brazilian Journal of Biology 63: 213-222. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-69842003000200006
  4. Choi, J.Y., G.H. La, S.K. Kim, K.S. Jeong and G.J. Joo(2013) Zooplankton community distribution in aquatic plants zone: Influence of epiphytic rotifers and cladocerans in accordance with aquatic plants cover and types. KJEE 46: 86-93. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2013.46.1.086
  5. Choi, J.Y., K.S. Jeong, G.H. La and G.J. Joo(2014a) Effect of removal of free-floating macrophytes on zooplankton habitat in shallow wetland. Knowl. Manag. Aquat. Ecosyst. 414, 11.
  6. Choi, J.Y., K.S. Jeong, G.H. La, H.W. Kim, K.H. Chang and G.J. Joo(2011) Inter-annual variability of a zooplankton community: the importance of summer concentrated rainfall in a regulated river ecosystem. J. Ecol. Field Biol. 34: 49-58. https://doi.org/10.5141/JEFB.2011.007
  7. Choi, J.Y., K.S. Jeong, G.H. La, S.K. Kim and G.J. Joo(2014b) Sustainment of epiphytic microinvertebrate assemblage in relation with different aquatic plant microhabitats in freshwater wetlands (South Korea). J. Limnol. 73: 11-16.
  8. Choi, J.Y., K.S. Jeong, S.K. Kim, G.H. La, K.H. Chang and G.J. Joo(2014c) Role of macrophytes as microhabitats for zooplankton community in lentic freshwater ecosystems of South Korea. Eco. Inform. 24: 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2014.09.002
  9. Choi, J.Y., S.K. Kim, G.H. La, K.S. Jeong, H.W. Kim, T.K. Kim and G.J. Joo(2012) Microcrustacean community dynamics in Upo Wetlands: Impact of rainfall and physiochemical factor on microcrustacean community. Korea J. Limnol. 45: 329-335. (in Korean with English abstract)
  10. Crowder, L.B. and W.E. Cooper(1982) Habitat structural complexity and the interaction between bluegills and their prey. Ecology. 63: 1802-1813. https://doi.org/10.2307/1940122
  11. Denny, P.(1994) Biodiversity and wetlands. Wetl. Ecol. Manag. 3: 55-61.
  12. Diehl, S.(1988) Foraging efficiency of three freshwater fishes: effects of structural complexity and light. Oikos. 53: 207-214. https://doi.org/10.2307/3566064
  13. Dionne, M. and C.L. Folt(1991) An experimental analysis of macrophyte growth forms as fish foraging habitat. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 48: 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1139/f91-017
  14. Geurts, J.J., A.J. Smolders, J.T. Verhoeven, J.G. Roelofs and L.P. Lamers(2008) Sediment Fe: PO4 ratio as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for the restoration of macrophyte biodiversity in fen waters. Freshwater Biol. 53: 2101-2116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02038.x
  15. Jeong, K.S., D.K. Kim and G.J. Joo(2007) Delayed influence of dam storage and discharge on the determination of seasonal proliferations of Microcystis aeruginosa and Stephanodiscus hantzschii in a regulated river system of the lower Nakdong River (South Korea). Water Res. 41: 1269-1279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.11.054
  16. Jeong, K.S., G.J. Joo, H.W. Kim, K. Ha and F. Recknagel(2001) Prediction and elucidation of phytoplankton dynamics in the Nakdong River (Korea) by means of a recurrent artificial neural network. Ecol. Model. 146: 115-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00300-3
  17. Jeppesen, E., T.L. Lauridsen, T. Kairesalo and M.R. Perrow(1998) Impact of submerged macrophytes on fish-zooplankton interactions in lakes. In E. Jeppesen, M. Sondergaard and K. Christoffersen (Eds.), The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes. (pp. 91-114). New York. Springer.
  18. Keast, A.(1984) The introduced aquatic macrophyte, Myriophyllum spicatum, as habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Can. J. Zoolog. 62: 1289-1303. https://doi.org/10.1139/z84-186
  19. Kim, I.S. and J.Y. Park(2002) Freshwater fishes of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co. Seoul. (in Korean)
  20. Lauridsen, T.L., L.J. Pedersen, E. Jeppesen and M. Sonergaard(1996) The importance of macrophyte bed size for cladoceran composition and horizontal migration in a shallow lake. J. Plankton Res. 18: 2283-2294. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/18.12.2283
  21. Lauridsen, T.L., E. Jeppesen, M. Sondergaard and D.M. Lodge(1998) Horizontal migration of zooplankton: predator-mediated use of macrophyte habitat. In The Structuring Role of Submerged Macrophytes in Lakes (pp. 233-239). Springer New York.
  22. Lee, W.O., I.R. Lee, H.Y. Song and I.C. Bang(2008) Genetic Differentiation of the Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides from the Major Rivers and Reservoirs in Korea Assessed by AFLP. Korean J. Limnol. 41: 395-401. (in Korean with English abstract)
  23. Lillie, R.A. and J. Budd(1992) Habitat architecture of Myriophyllum spicatum L. as an index to habitat quality for fish and macroinvertebrates. J. Freshwater. Ecol. 7: 113-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02705060.1992.9664677
  24. Manatunge, J., T. Asaeda and T. Priyadarshana(2000) The influence of structural complexity on fish-zooplankton interactions: a study using artificial submerged macrophytes. Environ. Biol. Fish 58: 425-438. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007691425268
  25. Meerhoff, M., C. Iglesias, F.T. de Mello, J.M. Clemente, E. Jensen, T.L. Lauridsen and E. Jeppesen(2007) Effects of habitat complexity on community structure and predator avoidance behaviour of littoral zooplankton in temperate versus subtropical shallow lakes. Freshwater Biol. 52: 1009-1021. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2427.2007.01748.x
  26. Mittelbach, G.G.(1981) Foraging efficiency and body size: a study of optimal diet and habitat use by bluegills. Ecology 62: 1370-1386. https://doi.org/10.2307/1937300
  27. Mizuno, T. and E. Takahashi(1999) (Eds). An illustrated guide to freshwater zooplankton in Japan. Tokai University press, Tokyo.
  28. Moyle, P.B. and J.J. Cech Jr(2000) Hydromineral balance. Fishes: an Introduction to Ichthyology 79-96.
  29. Nelson, J.S.(1994) Fishes of the World. 3nd ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
  30. Niehoff, D., U. Fritsch and A. Bronstert(2002) Land-use impacts on storm-runoff generation: scenarios of land-use change and simulation of hydrological response in a meso-scale catchment in SW-Germany. J. Hydrol. 267: 80-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00142-7
  31. Okun N. and T. Mehner(2005) Distribution and feeding of juvenile fish on invertebrates in littoral reed (Phragmites) stands. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 14: 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00087.x
  32. Paukert, C.P. and D.W. Willis(2002) Seasonal and diel habitat selection by bluegills in a shallow natural lake. T. Am. Fish. Soc. 131: 1131-1139. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<1131:SADHSB>2.0.CO;2
  33. Perrow, M.R., A.J. Jowitt, J.H. Stansfield and G.L. Phillips(1999) The practical importance of the interactions between fish, zooplankton and macrophytes in shallow lake restoration. Hydrobiologia 395: 199-210.
  34. Pelicice, F.M. and A.A. Agostinho(2006) Feeding ecology of fishes associated with Egeria spp. patches in a tropical reservoir, Brazil. Ecol. Freshw. Fish 15: 10-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0633.2005.00121.x
  35. Robertson, A.I. and R.C.J. Lenanton(1984) Fish community structure and food chain dynamics in the surf-zone of sandy beaches: the role of detached macrophyte detritus. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 84: 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0981(84)90185-0
  36. Son, M.W. and Y.G. Jeon(2003) Physical geographical characteristics of natural wetlands on the downstream reach of Nakdong River. J. Korean Assoc. Reg. Geogr. 9: 66-76. (in Korean with English abstract)
  37. Stansfield, J.H., M.R. Perrow, L.D. Tench, A.J. Jowitt and A.A. Taylor(1997) Submerged macrophytes as refuges for grazing Cladocera against fish predation: observations on seasonal changes in relation to macrophyte cover and predation pressure. In Shallow Lakes' 95 (pp. 229-240). Springer Netherlands.
  38. Terashima, A.(1980) Bluegill: a vacant ecological niche in Lake Biwa. In: T. Kawai, H. Kawanabe and N. Mizuno, Editors, Freshwater Organisms in Japan: Their Ecology of Invasion and Disturbance, Tokai Univ. Press, Tokyo, p. 63-70.
  39. Thomaz, S.M., E.D. Dibble, L.R. Evangelista, J. Higuti, and L.M. Bini(2008) Influence of aquatic macrophyte habitat complexity on invertebrate abundance and richness in tropical lagoons. Freshwater Biol. 53: 358-367.
  40. Valley, R.D. and M.T. Bremigan(2002) Effects of macrophyte bed architecture on largemouth bass foraging: implications of exotic macrophyte invasions. T. Am. Fish. Soc. 131: 234-244. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(2002)131<0234:EOMBAO>2.0.CO;2
  41. van Donk, E. and W.J. van de Bund(2002) Impact of submerged macrophytes including charophytes on phyto-and zooplankton communities: allelopathy versus other mechanisms. Aquat. Bot. 72: 261-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3770(01)00205-4
  42. Warfe, D.M. and L.A. Barmuta(2004) Habitat structural complexity mediates the foraging success of multiple predator species. Oecologia 141: 171-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-004-1644-x
  43. Werner, E.E. and D.J. Hall(1977) Competition and habitat shift in two sunfishes (Centrarchidae). Ecology 58: 869-876. https://doi.org/10.2307/1936222
  44. Wetzel, R.G. and G.E. Likens(2000) Limnological Analyses, Springer-Verlag, New York.
  45. Wolcox, D.A. and J.E. Meeker(1992) Implications for faunal habitat related to altered macrophyte structure in regulated lakes in northern Minnesota. Wetlands 12: 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160609