School Mathematics (대한수학교육학회지:학교수학)

The Korea Society of Educational Studies in Mathematics (대한수학교육학회)
권호 표지

An Activity Theoretical Analysis on the Instrumenatal Orchestration of the Teacher: Focusing on the Calculator-Based Classroom Activities of Gifted Elementary Math Students

교사의 도구적 오케스트레이션에 관한 활동이론적 분석: 계산기 기반 초등 수학 영재 수업을 중심으로

  • Received : 2015.05.09
  • Accepted : 2015.05.29
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain a deeper understanding of didactic processing in the class that unified with engineering by analyzing on the types of the teacher's instumental orchestration and schematizing it as an activity system. In order to do so, a qualitative study of a 5th grade class for math-gifted students in Y elementary school with ethnography was conducted. Interviews with the students were held and various document data were collected during the participational observation of the class. The collected qualitative data were gone through the analytical induction while the instrumental orchestration of Drijvers, Boon, Doorman, Reed, & Gravemeijer as well as the secondgeneration activity theory of Engestrom were using as the frame of conceptional reference. According to the result of this study, there exist 4 types, such as 'technical demo' 'link screen board', 'detection-exploring small group' and 'explain the screen and technical demo'.

본 연구는 계산기를 활용하는 초등 수학 영재 수업에서 나타나는 교사의 도구적 오케스트레이션 유형을 분석하고 활동체계로 도식화해 봄으로써 공학이 통합된 수업에 관한 교사의 교수학적 실행에 대한 이해를 얻고자 하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 Y초등학교 5학년 영재 학급을 대상으로 미시적 문화기술지를 활용한 질적 연구를 수행하였다. 영재 수업에 참여관찰하면서 영재 학급 내 구성원들과 인터뷰를 실시하고, 다양한 문서 자료를 수집하였다. 그리고 수집된 질적 자료를 분석하기 위해 분석적 귀납법을 적용하였으며, Drijvers, Boon, Doorman, Reed, & Gravemeijer의 도구적 오케스트레이션 유형과 Engestrom의 2세대 활동이론을 개념적 준거틀로 활용하였다. 본 연구 결과에 따르면 '기술-설명하기', '스크린-화면-연결하기', '발견-소집단 탐구하기', 그리고 '기술-화면-설명하기'의 4개의 유형이 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. 김석화 (2014). 계산기 활용이 초등수학교사의 인식과 수업에 미치는 영향에 대한 사례연구, 미출판 석사학위논문, 경인교육대학교 교육대학원, 인천.
  2. 김의식 (2002). 초등학교 수학에서 계산기 사용이 아동의 수학 학습력 및 성향에 미치는 영향, 미출판 석사학위논문, 대구교육대학교 교육대학원, 대구.
  3. 김지연 (2011). 계산기를 활용한 수학학습이 수학 학습부진아의 문제해결력 및 수학 학습태도에 미치는 영향, 미출판 석사학위논문, 서울교육대학교 교육대학원, 서울.
  4. 안병곤 (2005). 초등수학에서 계산기 활용에 대한 효과 분석. 학교수학, 7(1), 17-32.
  5. 양순환 (2003). 초등학교 6학년 수학과 계산기 활용 방안 연구, 미출판 석사학위논문, 한국교원대학교 교육대학원, 청주.
  6. 이헌수 (2011). 테크놀로지를 활용한 수학 영재교육, 미출판 박사학위논문, 전남대학교 대학원, 광주.
  7. Artigue, M. (2001). Learning Mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. Retrieved from http://www.lkl.ac.uk/research/came/events/freudenthal/1-Presentation-Artigue.pdf.
  8. Drijvers, P., Boon, P., Doorman, M., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and the tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9254-5
  9. Drijvers, P. (2012). Teachers transforming resources into orchestrations. In G. Gueudet, B. Pepin, & L. Trouche (Eds.), From text to 'lived' resources: mathematics curriculum materials and teacher development (pp. 265-281). New York: Springer.
  10. Drijvers, P., Tacoma, S., Besamusca, A., Doorman, M., & Boon, P. (2013). Digital resources inviting changes in mid-adopting teachers' practices and orchestrations. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(7), 987-1001. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0535-1
  11. Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical reconceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639080020028747
  12. Lagrange, J. B., Artigue, M., Laborde, C., & Trouche, L. (2003). Technology and mathematics education: A multidimensional study of the evolution of research and innovation. In A. J. Bishop, M. A. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Second international handbook of mathematics education (pp. 237-269). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  13. Lagrange, J. B., & Monaghan, J. (2009). On the adoption of a model to interpret teachers'use of technology in mathematics lessons. Retrieved http://www.inrp.fr/editions/editionselectroniques
  14. McCauliff, E. (2004). The calculator in the elementary classroom: Making a useful tool out of an ineffective crutch. Concept, 27, 1-13.
  15. Surgenor, P. (2007). Pressing the right buttons: Calculator use in schools and in junior cycle mathematics: Summary report on phase II of the study of the effects of calculator use on mathematics in schools and in certificate examinations. Ireland: St. Patrick's College.
  16. Tabach, M. (2011). A mathematics teacher's practice in a technological environment: A case study analysis using two complementary theories. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 16(3), 247-265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-011-9186-x
  17. Texas Instruments. (1997). Getting started with the CBR. Retrieved from http://education.ti.com
  18. Trouche, L. (2004). Managing complexity of human/machine interactions in computerized learning environments: Guiding students' command process through instrumental orchestrations. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 9, 281-307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-004-3468-5
  19. Verillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: a contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172796
  20. Virkkunen, J., & Kuutti, K. (2000). Understanding organizational learning by focusing on 'activity system'. Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 10(4), 291-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00005-9