DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Methodological Issues in Questionnaire Design

  • Received : 2015.05.11
  • Accepted : 2015.05.28
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: The process of designing a questionnaire is complicated. Many questionnaires on nursing phenomena have been developed and used by nursing researchers. The purpose of this paper was to discuss questionnaire design and factors that should be considered when using existing scales. Methods: Methodological issues were discussed, such as factors in the design of questions, steps in developing questionnaires, wording and formatting methods for items, and administrations methods. How to use existing scales, how to facilitate cultural adaptation, and how to prevent socially desirable responding were discussed. Moreover, the triangulation method in questionnaire development was introduced. Results: Steps were recommended for designing questions such as appropriately operationalizing key concepts for the target population, clearly formatting response options, generating items and confirming final items through face or content validity, sufficiently piloting the questionnaire using item analysis, demonstrating reliability and validity, finalizing the scale, and training the administrator. Psychometric properties and cultural equivalence should be evaluated prior to administration when using an existing questionnaire and performing cultural adaptation. Conclusion: In the context of well-defined nursing phenomena, logical and systematic methods will contribute to the development of simple and precise questionnaires.

Keywords

References

  1. Colosi L. Designing an effective questionnaire [Internet]. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University; 2006 [cited 2015 April 27]. Available from: https://www.gateshead.gov.uk/DocumentLibrary/council/ consultation/Questionnaire-design-guidance-web.pdf.
  2. Frary RB. A brief guide to questionnaire development. Blacksburg, VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2003.
  3. Stehr-Green PA, Stehr-Green JK, Nelson A. Developing a questionnaire. FOCUS on Field Epidemiology. 2003;2(2):1-6.
  4. Rattray J, Jones MC. Essential elements of questionnaire design and development. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2007;16(2):234-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01573.x
  5. Netemeyer RG, Bearden WO, Sharma S. Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
  6. Leung WC. How to design a questionnaire. Student BMJ: Student British Medical Journal. 2001;9:187-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/sbmj.0106187
  7. Waltz C, Strickland OL, Lenz E. Measurement in nursing and health research. 4th ed. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company; 2010.
  8. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000;25(24):3186-3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  9. Corless IB, Nicholas PK, Nokes KM. Issues in cross-cultural quality-of-life research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship. 2001;33 (1):15-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00015.x
  10. van de Vijver F, Poortinga YH. Testing in culturally heterogeneous populations: When are cultural loadings undesirable? European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 1992;8(1):17-24.
  11. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  12. Knowles ES. Item context effects on personality scales: Measuring changes the measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1988;55(2):312-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.312
  13. Gibson D, Wermuth L, Sorensen JL, Menicucci L, Bernal G. Approval need in self-reports of addicts and family members. International Journal of the Addictions. 1987;22(9):895-903. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826088709027468
  14. Dijkstra W, Smit JH, Comijs HC. Using social desirability scales in research among the elderly. Quality and Quantity. 2001;35(1):107-115. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1023/A:1004816210439
  15. Kim J, Kang JH, Kim S, Smith TW, Son J, Berktold J. Comparison between self-administered questionnaire and computer-assisted self-interview for supplemental survey nonresponse. Field Methods. 2009;22 (1):57-69. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/1525822X09349925
  16. Mitchell ES. Multiple triangulation: A methodology for nursing science. ANS: Advances in Nursing Science. 1986;8(3):18-26. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00004
  17. Kimchi J, Polivka B, Stevenson JS. Triangulation: Operational definitions. Nursing Research. 1991;40(6):364-366.

Cited by

  1. 심리적 인슐린저항성 측정도구 개발 vol.46, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.6.813
  2. 노인 고혈압 자가간호행위 측정도구의 타당도와 신뢰도 검증 vol.24, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2017.24.1.1
  3. Essential aspects in the design of data collection instruments in primary health research vol.20, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-021620182053218
  4. Predictors of happiness among older Korean women living alone vol.19, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.13615
  5. Development and Psychometric Testing of Liver Transplant Therapeutic Adherence Questionnaire in a Triphasic Mixed-Method Study vol.29, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1526924819835824
  6. Limitações da pesquisa do Fórum de Segurança Pública sobre percepção de violência sexual no Brasil vol.31, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e190128
  7. Supervisor Support and Affective Organizational Commitment: The Mediator Role of Work Engagement vol.42, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/0193945919852426
  8. COVID-19 Outbreak in North Italy: An Overview on Dentistry. A Questionnaire Survey vol.17, pp.11, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113835
  9. Emergency drug kits at the Danish hospital pharmacies: varying management and challenges vol.27, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1136/ejhpharm-2018-001740
  10. Concomitants of menopause-specific quality of life in premenopausal and post-menopausal women living in South Korea vol.60, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2020.1767262
  11. Development and validation of the body shape scale (BOSHAS) for assessing body shape perception in African populations vol.20, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-09654-w
  12. Covid-19 Knowledge and Perceptions Among Dental Specialists: A Cross-Sectional Online Questionnaire Survey vol.14, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.2147/rmhp.s306880
  13. Association Between Patient Activation and Medication Adherence in Patients With Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study vol.12, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2021.722711
  14. An Exploratory Study of the Development and Pilot Testing of an Interactive Visual Tool of Neuropsychological Test Results in Memory Clinics vol.79, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-201128
  15. Forecasting Global Developments and Challenges in Olive Oil Supply and Demand: A Delphi Survey from Spain vol.11, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11030191
  16. Nurse‐to‐nurse collaboration between nurses caring for older people in hospital and primary health care: A cross‐sectional study vol.30, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15664
  17. The mediating role of regulatory emotional self‐efficacy on negative emotions during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A cross‐sectional study vol.30, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12830