Journal of Gastric Cancer

  • 제15권2호
  • /
  • Pages.77-86
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 2093-582X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-5641(eISSN)
대한위암학회 (The Korean Gastric Cancer Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proximal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer

  • Jung, Do Hyun (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ahn, Sang-Hoon (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Do Joong (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyung-Ho (Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2015.05.16
  • 심사 : 2015.05.26
  • 발행 : 2015.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) is theoretically a superior choice of minimally-invasive surgery and function-preserving surgery for the treatment of proximal early gastric cancer (EGC) over procedures such as laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG), open total gastrectomy (OTG) and open proximal gastrectomy (OPG). However, LPG and OPG are not popular surgical options due to three main concerns: the first, oncological safety; the second, functional benefits; and the third, anastomosis-related late complications (reflux symptoms and anastomotic stricture). Numerous recent studies have concluded that OPG and LPG present similar oncological safety profiles and improved functional benefits when compared with OTG and LTG. While OPG with modified esophagogastrostomy does not provide satisfactory results, OPG with modified esophagojejunostomy showed similar rates of anastomosis-related late complications when compared to OTG. At this stage, no standard reconstruction method post-LPG exists in the clinical setting. We recently showed that LPG with double tract reconstruction (DTR) is a superior choice over LTG for proximal EGC in terms of maintaining body weight and preventing anemia. However, as there is no definitive evidence in favor of LPG with DTR, a randomized clinical trial comparing LPG with DTR to LTG was recommended. This trial, the Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study-05 (NCT01433861), is expected to assist surgeons in choice of surgical approach and strategy for patients with proximal EGC.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jeong O, Park YK. Clinicopathological features and surgical treatment of gastric cancer in South Korea: the results of 2009 nationwide survey on surgically treated gastric cancer patients. J Gastric Cancer 2011;11:69-77. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2011.11.2.69
  2. Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, et al. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 2014;32:627-633. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551
  3. Kitamura K, Yamaguchi T, Nishida S, Yamamoto K, Ichikawa D, Okamoto K, et al. The operative indications for proximal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Surg Today 1997;27:993-998. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02385777
  4. Kong SH, Kim JW, Lee HJ, Kim WH, Lee KU, Yang HK. Reverse double-stapling end-to-end esophagogastrostomy in proximal gastrectomy. Dig Surg 2010;27:170-174. https://doi.org/10.1159/000264658
  5. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2010 (ver. 3). Gastric Cancer 2011;14:113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0042-4
  6. Zhao P, Xiao SM, Tang LC, Ding Z, Zhou X, Chen XD. Proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition and TGRY anastomosis for proximal gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 2014;20:8268-8273. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8268
  7. Wen L, Chen XZ, Wu B, Chen XL, Wang L, Yang K, et al. Total vs. proximal gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:633-640.
  8. Harrison LE, Karpeh MS, Brennan MF. Total gastrectomy is not necessary for proximal gastric cancer. Surgery 1998;123:127-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6060(98)70248-X
  9. Pu YW, Gong W, Wu YY, Chen Q, He TF, Xing CG. Proximal gastrectomy versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric carcinoma. A meta-analysis on postoperative complications, 5-year survival, and recurrence rate. Saudi Med J 2013;34:1223-1228.
  10. Nozaki I, Hato S, Kobatake T, Ohta K, Kubo Y, Kurita A. Longterm outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer compared with total gastrectomy. World J Surg 2013;37:558-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-012-1894-4
  11. An JY, Youn HG, Choi MG, Noh JH, Sohn TS, Kim S. The difficult choice between total and proximal gastrectomy in proximal early gastric cancer. Am J Surg 2008;196:587-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.09.040
  12. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Kubota T, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients who underwent limited proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:141-145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0257-7
  13. Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Han WK, Pae WK. Long-term results of proximal and total gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach. Cancer Res Treat 2004;36:50-55. https://doi.org/10.4143/crt.2004.36.1.50
  14. Ikeguchi M, Kader A, Takaya S, Fukumoto Y, Osaki T, Saito H, et al. Prognosis of patients with gastric cancer who underwent proximal gastrectomy. Int Surg 2012;97:275-279. https://doi.org/10.9738/CC150.1
  15. Kikuchi S, Nemoto Y, Katada N, Sakuramoto S, Kobayashi N, Shimao H, et al. Results of follow-up endoscopy in patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:304-307.
  16. Ohyama S, Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Fukunaga T, Fujisaki J, Seto Y, et al. A clinicopathological study of gastric stump carcinoma following proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2009;12:88-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-009-0502-2
  17. Hiki N, Nunobe S, Kubota T, Jiang X. Function-preserving gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2013;20:2683-2692. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-013-2931-8
  18. Nozaki I, Kurita A, Nasu J, Kubo Y, Aogi K, Tanada M, et al. Higher incidence of gastric remnant cancer after proximal than distal gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:1604-1608.
  19. Tokunaga M, Ohyama S, Hiki N, Hoshino E, Nunobe S, Fukunaga T, et al. Endoscopic evaluation of reflux esophagitis after proximal gastrectomy: comparison between esophagogastric anastomosis and jejunal interposition. World J Surg 2008;32:1473-1477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9459-7
  20. Iwata T, Kurita N, Ikemoto T, Nishioka M, Andoh T, Shimada M. Evaluation of reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy: prospective comparative study of jejunal interposition and jejunal pouch interposition. Hepatogastroenterology 2006;53:301-303.
  21. Masuzawa T, Takiguchi S, Hirao M, Imamura H, Kimura Y, Fujita J, et al. Comparison of perioperative and long-term outcomes of total and proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study. World J Surg 2014;38:1100-1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-013-2370-5
  22. Hinoshita E, Takahashi I, Onohara T, Nishizaki T, Matsusaka T, Wakasugi K, et al. The nutritional advantages of proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48:1513-1516.
  23. Kondoh Y, Okamoto Y, Morita M, Nabeshima K, Nakamura K, Soeda J, et al. Clinical outcome of proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2007;32:48-53.
  24. Kim EM, Jeong HY, Lee ES, Moon HS, Sung JK, Kim SH, et al. Comparision between proximal gastrectomy and total gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. Korean J Gastroenterol 2009;54:212-219. https://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2009.54.4.212
  25. Yoo CH, Sohn BH, Han WK, Pae WK. Proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by jejunal pouch interposition for upper third gastric cancer: prospective randomized study. World J Surg 2005;29:1592-1599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-7793-1
  26. Takiguchi N, Takahashi M, Ikeda M, Inagawa S, Ueda S, Nobuoka T, et al. Long-term quality-of-life comparison of total gastrectomy and proximal gastrectomy by postgastrectomy syndrome assessment scale (PGSAS-45): a nationwide multiinstitutional study. Gastric Cancer 2015;18:407-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-014-0377-8
  27. Nomura E, Lee SW, Tokuhara T, Kawai M, Uchiyama K. Functional outcomes according to the size of the gastric remnant and type of reconstruction following open and laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:1677-1681.
  28. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Otsuji E. Evaluation of symptoms related to reflux esophagitis in patients with esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013;398:697-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-012-0921-0
  29. Namikawa T, Oki T, Kitagawa H, Okabayashi T, Kobayashi M, Hanazaki K. Impact of jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer on quality of life: short- and long-term consequences. Am J Surg 2012;204:203-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.09.035
  30. Hirai T, Matsumoto H, Iki K, Hirabayashi Y, Kawabe Y, Ikeda M, et al. Lower esophageal sphincter- and vagus-preserving proximal partial gastrectomy for early cancer of the gastric cardia. Surg Today 2006;36:874-878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-006-3265-y
  31. Adachi Y, Katsuta T, Aramaki M, Morimoto A, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. Proximal gastrectomy and gastric tube reconstruction for early cancer of the gastric cardia. Dig Surg 1999;16:468-470. https://doi.org/10.1159/000018771
  32. Ronellenfitsch U, Najmeh S, Andalib A, Perera RM, Rousseau MC, Mulder DS, et al. Functional outcomes and quality of life after proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy using a narrow gastric conduit. Ann Surg Oncol 2015;22:772-779.
  33. Kondoh Y, Ishii A, Ishizu K, Hanashi T, Okamoto Y, Morita M, et al. Esophagogastrostomy before proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancers in the upper third of the stomach. Tokai J Exp Clin Med 2006;31:146-149.
  34. Ishigami S, Uenosono Y, Arigami T, Kurahara H, Okumura H, Matsumoto M, et al. Novel fundoplication for esophagogastrostomy after proximal gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2013;60:1814-1816.
  35. Katsoulis IE, Robotis JF, Kouraklis G, Yannopoulos PA. What is the difference between proximal and total gastrectomy regarding postoperative bile reflux into the oesophagus? Dig Surg 2006;23:325-330. https://doi.org/10.1159/000097948
  36. Katai H, Morita S, Saka M, Taniguchi H, Fukagawa T. Longterm outcome after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for suspected early cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Br J Surg 2010;97:558-562. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.6944
  37. Adachi Y, Inoue T, Hagino Y, Shiraishi N, Shimoda K, Kitano S. Surgical results of proximal gastrectomy for early-stage gastric cancer: jejunal interposition and gastric tube reconstruction. Gastric Cancer 1999;2:40-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s101200050019
  38. Nakamura M, Nakamori M, Ojima T, Katsuda M, Iida T, Hayata K, et al. Reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach: an analysis of our 13-year experience. Surgery 2014;156:57-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.015
  39. Takagawa R, Kunisaki C, Kimura J, Makino H, Kosaka T, Ono HA, et al. A pilot study comparing jejunal pouch and jejunal interposition reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy. Dig Surg 2010;27:502-508. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321224
  40. Tokunaga M, Hiki N, Ohyama S, Nunobe S, Miki A, Fukunaga T, et al. Effects of reconstruction methods on a patient's quality of life after a proximal gastrectomy: subjective symptoms evaluation using questionnaire survey. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2009;394:637-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-008-0442-z
  41. Ichikawa D, Ueshima Y, Shirono K, Kan K, Shioaki Y, Lee CJ, et al. Esophagogastrostomy reconstruction after limited proximal gastrectomy. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48:1797-1801.
  42. Shiraishi N, Adachi Y, Kitano S, Kakisako K, Inomata M, Yasuda K. Clinical outcome of proximal versus total gastrectomy for proximal gastric cancer. World J Surg 2002;26:1150-1154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-002-6369-6
  43. Tomita R, Fujisaki S, Tanjoh K, Fukuzawa M. A novel operative technique on proximal gastrectomy reconstructed by interposition of a jejunal J pouch with preservation of the vagal nerve and lower esophageal sphincter. Hepatogastroenterology 2001;48:1186-1191.
  44. Yabusaki H, Nashimoto A, Matsuki A, Aizawa M. Evaluation of jejunal pouch interposition after proximal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer in the upper third of the stomach. Hepatogastroenterology 2012;59:2032-2036.
  45. Kobayashi M, Araki K, Okamoto K, Okabayashi T, Akimori T, Sugimoto T. Anti-reflux pouch-esophagostomy after proximal gastrectomy with jejunal pouch interposition reconstruction. Hepatogastroenterology 2007;54:116-118.
  46. Hoshikawa T, Denno R, Ura H, Yamaguchi K, Hirata K. Proximal gastrectomy and jejunal pouch interposition: evaluation of postoperative symptoms and gastrointestinal hormone secretion. Oncol Rep 2001;8:1293-1299.
  47. Zhao Q, Li Y, Guo W, Zhang Z, Ma Z, Jiao Z. Clinical application of modified double tracks anastomosis in proximal gastrectomy. Am Surg 2011;77:1593-1599.
  48. Uyama I, Ogiwara H, Takahara T, Kikuchi K, Iida S. Laparoscopic and minilaparotomy proximal gastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy: technique and case report. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1995;5:487-491.
  49. Ichikawa D, Komatsu S, Okamoto K, Shiozaki A, Fujiwara H, Otsuji E. Esophagogastrostomy using a circular stapler in laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with an incision in the left abdomen. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2012;397:57-62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-011-0840-5
  50. Ahn SH, Jung do H, Son SY, Lee CM, Park do J, Kim HH. Laparoscopic double-tract proximal gastrectomy for proximal early gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2014;17:562-570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-013-0303-5
  51. Kitano S, Adachi Y, Shiraishi N, Suematsu T, Bando T. Laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy for early gastric carcinomas. Surg Today 1999;29:389-391. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02483072
  52. Sakuramoto S, Yamashita K, Kikuchi S, Futawatari N, Katada N, Moriya H, et al. Clinical experience of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with Toupet-like partial fundoplication in early gastric cancer for preventing reflux esophagitis. J Am Coll Surg 2009;209:344-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.011
  53. Okabe H, Obama K, Tanaka E, Tsunoda S, Akagami M, Sakai Y. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with a hand-sewn esophago-gastric anastomosis using a knifeless endoscopic linear stapler. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:268-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0181-2
  54. Kim DJ, Lee JH, Kim W. Lower esophageal sphincter-preserving laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer: a method for the prevention of reflux esophagitis. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:440-444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0202-1
  55. Takayama T, Matsumoto S, Wakatsuki K, Tanaka T, Migita K, Ito M, et al. A novel laparoscopic procedure for treating proximal early gastric cancer: laparoscopy-assisted pyloruspreserving nearly total gastrectomy. Surg Today 2014;44:2332-2338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-0928-y
  56. Esquivel CM, Ampudia C, Fridman A, Moon R, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Technique and outcomes of laparoscopiccombined linear stapler and hand-sutured side-to-side esophagojejunostomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction as a treatment modality in patients undergoing proximal gastrectomy for benign and malignant disease of the gastroesophageal junction. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2014;24:89-93. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828f673d
  57. Yasuda A, Yasuda T, Imamoto H, Kato H, Nishiki K, Iwama M, et al. A newly modified esophagogastrostomy with a reliable angle of His by placing a gastric tube in the lower mediastinum in laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer 2014. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0431-6 [epub].
  58. Hosogi H, Yoshimura F, Yamaura T, Satoh S, Uyama I, Kanaya S. Esophagogastric tube reconstruction with stapled pseudofornix in laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a novel technique proposed for Siewert type II tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2014;399:517-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-014-1163-0
  59. Mochiki E, Fukuchi M, Ogata K, Ohno T, Ishida H, Kuwano H. Postoperative functional evaluation of gastric tube after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 2014;34:4293-4298.
  60. Takeuchi H, Oyama T, Kamiya S, Nakamura R, Takahashi T, Wada N, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with sentinel node mapping for early gastric cancer. World J Surg 2011;35:2463-2471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1223-3
  61. Tonouchi H, Mohri Y, Tanaka K, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M. Hemidouble stapling for esophagogastrostomy during laparoscopically assisted proximal gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2006;16:242-244. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129689-200608000-00009
  62. Aihara R, Mochiki E, Ohno T, Yanai M, Toyomasu Y, Ogata K, et al. Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with gastric tube reconstruction for early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 2010;24:2343-2348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0947-8
  63. Kinoshita T, Gotohda N, Kato Y, Takahashi S, Konishi M, Kinoshita T. Laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy with jejunal interposition for gastric cancer in the proximal third of the stomach: a retrospective comparison with open surgery. Surg Endosc 2013;27:146-153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2401-6
  64. Ahn SH, Lee JH, Park do J, Kim HH. Comparative study of clinical outcomes between laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy (LAPG) and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy (LATG) for proximal gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 2013;16:282-289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-012-0178-x
  65. Nomura E, Lee SW, Kawai M, Yamazaki M, Nabeshima K, Nakamura K, et al. Functional outcomes by reconstruction technique following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: double tract versus jejunal interposition. World J Surg Oncol 2014;12:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-20

피인용 문헌

  1. Minimally invasive surgery in gastric cancer vol.11, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.15008
  2. Features of lymphatic metastasis of proximal gastric cancer vol.98, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.17750/kmj2017-674
  3. Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes between endoscopic and surgical resection for early-stage adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction vol.32, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6076-5
  4. Can proximal Gastrectomy Be Justified for Advanced Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction? vol.18, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2018.18.e33
  5. Robot-Assisted Versus Laparoscopy-Assisted Proximal Gastrectomy for Early Gastric Cancer in the Upper Location : Comparison of Oncological Outcomes, Surgical Stress, and Nutritional Status vol.25, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1177/1073274818765999
  6. Function-Preserving Surgery in Gastric Cancer vol.21, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2018.21.4.141
  7. Adenokarzinom des ösophagogastralen Übergangs - Operationstechnik vol.25, pp.12, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00761-019-00656-x
  8. Prognosis of proximal upper-third gastric cancer excluding tumors originating in the esophagogastric junction vol.15, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14216/kjco.19017
  9. Esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas: individualization of resection with special considerations for Siewert type II, and Nishi types EG, E=G and GE cancers vol.23, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-01022-x
  10. Double-Tract-Rekonstruktion nach Resektion des gastroösophagealen Übergangs wegen AEG-II- und -III-Tumoren vol.41, pp.9, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1267-3651
  11. Short-term and long-term comparisons of laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy by the double-flap technique and laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy for proximal gastric vol.15, pp.11, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242223
  12. The pattern of postoperative quality of life following minimally invasive gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a prospective cohort from Korean multicenter robotic gastrectomy trial vol.99, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2020.99.5.275
  13. Comparisons of Postoperative Complications and Nutritional Status After Proximal Laparoscopic Gastrectomy with Esophagogastrostomy and Double-Tract Reconstruction vol.63, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.33160/yam.2020.11.019
  14. Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis Among Adults With Gastric Adenocarcinoma Managed With Total Gastrectomy vol.4, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35810
  15. Clinical features of internal hernia after gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.24, pp.1, 2021, https://doi.org/10.7602/jmis.2021.24.1.18
  16. Current status of function‐preserving gastrectomy for gastric cancer vol.5, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1002/ags3.12430
  17. A modified double-tract reconstruction following laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy for Siewert Ⅱ adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (with video) vol.4, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lers.2021.10.001