DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Approximate Optimization of the Power Transmission Drive Shaft Considering Strength Design Condition

강도 조건을 고려한 동력 전달 드라이브 샤프트의 근사최적설계

  • Shao, Hailong (Graduate School of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Lee, Jongsoo (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2014.12.23
  • Accepted : 2015.02.26
  • Published : 2015.04.15

Abstract

Presently, rapidly changing and unstable global economic environments demand engineers. Products should be designed to increase profits by lowering costs and provide distinguished performance compared with competitors. This study aims to optimize the design of the power-transmission drive shaft. The mass is reduced as an objective function, and the stress is constrained under a constant value. To reduce the number of experiments, CCD (central composite design) and D-Optimal are used for the experimental design. RSM (response surface methodology) is employed to construct a regression model for the objective functions and constraint function. In this problem, there is only one objective function for the mass. The other objective function gives 1; thus, NSGA-II is used.

Keywords

References

  1. Lim, S. J., Lee, N. K., Na, K. H., Lee, C. H., 2003, Performance Characteristics of the Automotive TDS(Tube Drive Shaft) by the Rotary Swaging Process, Trans. Mater. Process., 12:7 654-661. https://doi.org/10.5228/KSPP.2003.12.7.654
  2. Lim, S. J., Lee, N. K., Na, K. H., Lee, C. H., 2005, Vibration Mode and Durability Characteristics of Automotive TDS Using Rotary Swaging Process for Incremental Forming, KSAE, 13:5 127-133.
  3. Choi, H. Y., Lee, J. S., Park, J., 2012, Approximate Multi-objective Optimization of Robot Casting Considering Strength Design Condition, KSMTE, 21:6 954-960. https://doi.org/10.7735/ksmte.2012.21.6.954
  4. Dana, n.d., viewed 5 December 2014, Drive Shafts for Industrial Applications .
  5. Patil, B., Kandagal, F., Vinoth M.A., 2014, Weight Optimization and FEA Analysis of Al-Si Metal Matrix Composite Drive Shaft, IJECS, 3 7713-7717.
  6. Gopals Krishna, V., Subrahmanyam, B. V., Srinivasulu, R., 2013, Finite Element Analysis and Optimization of Automotive Composite Drive Shaft, IJETT, 5:7 346-35.
  7. Park, S. H., 1995, Modern Design of Experiments, Minyongsa, Republic of Korea.
  8. Hong, K. J., Jeon, K. K., Cho. Y. S., Choi, D. H., Lee, S. J., 2000, A Study on the Construction of Response Surface for Design Optimization, Trans. of the KSME(A), 24:6 1408-1418.
  9. Triefenbach, F., 2008, Design of Experiment: The D-optimal Approach and Its Implementation As a Computer Algorithm, A Thesis for a Bachelor Degree, Information and Communication Technology, Umea University, Sweden.
  10. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T., 2002, A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6:2 182-197. https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017