DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Simple Aesthetic Correction for Patients with Acute Auriculocephalic Angle

  • Lee, Byung Mi (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kang, Seok Joo (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sun, Hook (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2015.02.13
  • Accepted : 2015.04.02
  • Published : 2015.04.09

Abstract

Background: Acute auriculocephalic angle refers to an ear with helix that is spaced closely to the cranium. An increasing number of patients with acute auriculocephalic angle wish to undergo corrective operation for aesthetic purposes. However, there is a paucity of data regarding acute auriculocephalic angle. This paper proposes a treatment protocol for patients with acute auriculocephalic angle. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing acute auriculocephalic angle (4 patients, 6 ears). Patient records were reviewed for demographic data as well as auricular measurements at preoperative, immediate postoperative and final follow-up evaluations. Results: All of the patients were men with a mean age of 36.5 years (range, 23-52 years). The mean follow-up period was 47.5 months (range, 28-60 months). Postoperative auriculocephalic angle was close to the normal auriculocephalic angle ($25^{\circ}-30^{\circ}$) without notable scars. Moreover, the patients had minimal contractions of the skin flaps without any hematoma or relapse. Conclusion: We propose the following three treatment protocols for patients with acute auriculocephalic angle: the posterior auricular muscle should be sufficiently released, the mastoid area should be augmented using implants, the skin should be repositioned with a superior auricular flap.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang JS. Face: reconstruction of the auricle. In: Kang JS, editor. Plastic surgery. 3rd ed. Seoul: Koonja; 2004. p.1464-508.
  2. Guerra AB, Metzinger SE, Metzinger RC, Xie C, Xie Y, Rigby PL, Naugle T Jr. Variability of the postauricular muscle complex: analysis of 40 hemicadaver dissections. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:342-7. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.6.5.342
  3. Guyuron B, DeLuca L. Ear projection and the posterior auricular muscle insertion. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:457-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199708000-00030
  4. Hwang CM, Lee BK, Green D, Jeong SY, Khang G, Jackson JD, Atala A, Lee SJ, Yoo JJ. Auricular reconstruction using tissue-engineered alloplastic implants for improved clinical outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014;133:360e-369e. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000438460.68098.4b
  5. Lee SJ, Broda C, Atala A, Yoo JJ. Engineered cartilage covered ear implants for auricular cartilage reconstruction. Biomacromolecules 2011;12:306-13. https://doi.org/10.1021/bm100856g
  6. Sakamoto Y, Nakajima H, Kishi K, Imanishi N. A new surgical correction of cryptotia with superior auricular myocutaneous flap. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010;63:1995-2000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2010.02.026