Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of fresh mineralized dentin and cementum on socket healing: a preliminary study in dogs

  • Kadkhodazadeh, Mahdi (Dental Research Center, Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Ghasemianpour, Majid (Endodontic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Soltanian, Negar (Dental School, International Branch of Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Sultanian, Gholam Reza (Iran Veterinary Organization) ;
  • Ahmadpour, Shahriar (Department of Anatomical Sciences, Medicine Faculty, North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Amid, Reza (Dental Research Center, Department of Periodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences)
  • Received : 2014.12.14
  • Accepted : 2015.03.09
  • Published : 2015.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: Dentin is composed of many minerals and growth factors. Based on this composition, we studied its effect as a possible regenerative material for alveolar healing. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted using four 2.5-year-old mongrel dogs (male; weight, 25 to 30 kg). The third mandibular premolars were carefully mobilized with a dental elevator and then removed using forceps. The crown portions of the extracted teeth were removed with cutters, and the root portions of the remaining teeth were collectively trimmed as closely as possible to 350 to $500{\mu}m$. Dentin and cementum (DC) chips harvested from the extracted teeth were soaked in blood and packed into the fresh sockets (autograft). Biopsies were performed at the ends of day 14 and day 56 following implantation. Data were expressed as $mean{\pm}standard$ deviation and compared with t-test results. Results: The ratio of $S_A$(bone) to total area of each probe was determined and was $170{\pm}16{\mu}m^2$ for the control group and $71{\pm}14{\mu}m^2$ for the DC group, a significant difference (P <0.05). Conclusion: DC particulate grafts offered no improvement in bone regeneration in alveolar extraction sockets.

Keywords

References

  1. Irinakis T. Rationale for socket preservation after extraction of a single-rooted tooth when planning for future implant placement. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:917-22.
  2. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:820-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00565.x
  3. Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. A systematic review of post-extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(Suppl 5):1-21.
  4. Dimova C. Socket preservation procedure after tooth extraction. Key Engineering Materials 2014;587:325-30.
  5. Vignoletti F, Matesanz P, Rodrigo D, Figuero E, Martin C, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for ridge preservation after tooth extraction. A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;23(Suppl 5):22-38.
  6. Sattayasanskul W, Brook IM, Lamb DJ. Dense hydroxyapatite root replica implantation: measurement of mandibular ridge preservation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1988;3:203-7.
  7. Jung RE, Siegenthaler DW, Hammerle CH. Postextraction tissue management: a soft tissue punch technique. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2004;24:545-53.
  8. Kim YK, Kim SG, Oh JS, Jin SC, Son JS, Kim SY, et al. Analysis of the inorganic component of autogenous tooth bone graft material. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2011;11:7442-5. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2011.4857
  9. Huggins C, Wiseman S, Reddi AH. Transformation of fibroblasts by allogeneic and xenogeneic transplants of demineralized tooth and bone. J Exp Med 1970;132:1250-8. https://doi.org/10.1084/jem.132.6.1250
  10. Finkelman RD, Mohan S, Jennings JC, Taylor AK, Jepsen S, Baylink DJ. Quantitation of growth factors IGF-I, SGF/IGF-II, and TGF-beta in human dentin. J Bone Miner Res 1990;5:717-23.
  11. Bang G, Urist MR. Bone induction in excavation chambers in matrix of decalcified dentin. Arch Surg 1967;94:781-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1967.01330120035008
  12. Bessho K, Tagawa T, Murata M. Purification of rabbit bone morphogenetic protein derived from bone, dentin, and wound tissue after tooth extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:162-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80204-6
  13. Butler WT, Mikulski A, Urist MR, Bridges G, Uyeno S. Noncollagenous proteins of a rat dentin matrix possessing bone morphogenetic activity. J Dent Res 1977;56:228-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345770560030601
  14. Murata M, Kawai T, Kawakami T, Akazawa T, Tazaki J, Ito K, et al. Human acid-insoluble dentin with BMP2 accelerates bone induction in subcutaneous and intramuscular tissues. J Ceram Soc Jpn 2010;118:438-41. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.118.438
  15. Yeomans JD, Urist MR. Bone induction by decalcified dentine implanted into oral, osseous and muscle tissues. Arch Oral Biol 1967;12:999-1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(67)90095-7
  16. Murata M. Bone engineering using human demineralized dentin matrix and recombinant human BMP2. J Hard Tissue Biol 2005;14:80-1. https://doi.org/10.2485/jhtb.14.80
  17. Reed MG, Howard CV, de Yanes GS. One-stop stereology: the estimation of 3D parameters using isotropic rulers. J Microsc 2010;239:54-65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2818.2009.03356.x
  18. Wang X, Zauel RR, Rao DS, Fyhrie DP. Cancellous bone lamellae strongly affect microcrack propagation and apparent mechanical properties: separation of patients with osteoporotic fracture from normal controls using a 2D nonlinear finite element method (biomechanical stereology). Bone 2008;42:1184-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.01.022
  19. Lewandrowski KU, Tomford WW, Schomacker KT, Deutsch TF, Mankin HJ. Improved osteoinduction of cortical bone allografts: a study of the effects of laser perforation and partial demineralization. J Orthop Res 1997;15:748-56. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.1100150518
  20. Reddi AH. Bone matrix in the solid state: geometric influence on differentiation of fibroblasts. Adv Biol Med Phys 1974;15:1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-005215-8.50007-3
  21. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, et al. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;109:496-503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.10.017
  22. Nampo T, Watahiki J, Enomoto A, Taguchi T, Ono M, Nakano H, et al. A new method for alveolar bone repair using extracted teeth for the graft material. J Periodontol 2010;81:1264-72. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2010.100016
  23. Jeong HR, Hwang JH, Lee JK. Effectiveness of autogenous tooth bone used as a graft material for regeneration of bone in miniature pig. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 2011;37:375-9. https://doi.org/10.5125/jkaoms.2011.37.5.375
  24. Devecioglu D, Tozum TF, Sengun D, Nohutcu RM. Biomaterials in periodontal regenerative surgery: effects of cryopreserved bone, commercially available coral, demineralized freeze-dried dentin, and cementum on periodontal ligament fibroblasts and osteoblasts. J Biomater Appl 2004;19:107-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328204043818
  25. Gomes MF, Destro MF, Banzi EC, Vieira EM, Morosolli AR, Goulart Md. Optical density of bone repair after implantation of homogenous demineralized dentin matrix in diabetic rabbits. Braz Oral Res 2008;22:275-80. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242008000300015
  26. Urist MR, Granstein R, Nogami H, Svenson L, Murphy R. Transmembrane bone morphogenesis across multiple-walled diffusion chambers. New evidence for a diffusible bone morphogenetic property. Arch Surg 1977;112:612-9. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370050072012

Cited by

  1. Clinical Efficacy of Tooth-Bone Graft : A Systematic Review and Risk of Bias Analysis of Randomized Control Trials and Observational Studies vol.27, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/id.0000000000000687
  2. Comparison of Different Bone Filling Materials and Resorbable Membranes by Means of Micro-Tomography. A Preliminary Study in Rabbits vol.12, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081197
  3. The Use of Autogenous Teeth for Alveolar Ridge Preservation: A Literature Review vol.11, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041853
  4. Physicochemical and osteogenic properties of chairside processed tooth derived bone substitute and bone graft materials vol.40, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2019-341
  5. Autogenous Mineralized Dentin versus Xenograft granules in Ridge Preservation for Delayed Implantation in Post‐extraction Sites: A Randomized controlled clinical trial with an 18 months follow vol.32, pp.8, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13765