Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제54권6호
  • /
  • Pages.1175-1200
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

On the fundamental period of infilled RC frame buildings

  • Asteris, Panagiotis G. (Computational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education) ;
  • Repapis, Constantinos C. (Department of Civil Engineering, Technological Education Institute of Piraeus) ;
  • Cavaleri, Liborio (Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Ambientale, Aerospaziale e dei Materiali (DICAM), University of Palermo) ;
  • Sarhosis, Vasilis (School of Engineering, Cardiff University) ;
  • Athanasopoulou, Adamantia (Computational Mechanics Laboratory, School of Pedagogical and Technological Education)
  • 투고 : 2014.12.08
  • 심사 : 2015.04.04
  • 발행 : 2015.06.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper investigates the fundamental period of vibration of RC buildings by means of finite element macro-modelling and modal eigenvalue analysis. As a base study, a number of 14-storey RC buildings have been considered "according to code designed" and "according to code non-designed". Several parameters have been studied including the number of spans; the span length in the direction of motion; the stiffness of the infills; the percentage openings of the infills and; the location of the soft storeys. The computed values of the fundamental period are compared against those obtained from seismic code and equations proposed by various researchers in the literature. From the analysis of the results it has been found that the span length, the stiffness of the infill wall panels and the location of the soft storeys are crucial parameters influencing the fundamental period of RC buildings.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. AFPS-90 (1990), Recommendations for the redaction of rules relative to the structures and installation built in regions prone to earthquakes, France Association of Earthquake Engineering, Paris, France.
  2. Algerian Seismic Code (1988), Algerian Earthquake Resistance Regulations, Ministry of Town-planning and Construction, Algiers, Algeria.
  3. Al-Nimry, H., Resheidat, M. and Al-Jamal, M. (2014), "Ambient vibration testing of low and medium rise infilled RC frame buildings in Jordan", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 59, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.01.002
  4. Amanat, K.M. and Hoque, E. (2006), "A rationale for determining the natural period of RC building frames having infill", Eng. Struct., 28(4), 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.09.004
  5. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (2010), Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures, ASCE Standard ASCE/SEI 7-10. Reston, Virginia.
  6. Applied Technology Council (ATC) (1978), "Tentative provision for the development of seismic regulations for buildings", Report No. ATC3-06, Applied Technology Council, California.
  7. Asteris, P.G. (2003), "Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 129(8), 1071-1079. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:8(1071)
  8. Asteris, P.G. (2005), "Closure to 'Lateral stiffness of brick masonry infilled plane frames'by P.G. Asteris", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 131(3), 523-524. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:3(523)
  9. Asteris, P.G. (2008), "Finite element micro-modeling of infilled frames", Electr. J. Struct. Eng., 8(8), 1-11.
  10. Asteris, P.G., Antoniou, S.T., Sophianopoulos, D.S. and Chrysostomou, C.Z. (2011), "Mathematical macromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 137(12), 1508-1517. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000384
  11. Asteris, P.G., Cotsovos, D.M., Chrysostomou, C.Z., Mohebkhah, A. and Al-Chaar, G.K. (2013). "Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: state of the art", Eng. Struct., 56, 1905-1921. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.010
  12. Buonopane, S.G. and White, R.N. (1999), "Pseudodynamic testing of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frame", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 125(6), 578-589. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1999)125:6(578)
  13. Bureau of Indian Standards (2002), IS-1893, Indian Standard Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures-Part 1: General Provisions and Buildings, Fifth Revision, New Delhi, India.
  14. Cavaleri, L. and Papia, M. (2003) "A new dynamic identification technique: application to the evaluation of the equivalent strut for infilled frames", Eng. Struct., 25(7), 889-901. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(03)00023-3
  15. Cavaleri, L., Fossetti, M. and Papia, M. (2005), "Infilled frames: developments in the evaluation of cyclic behaviour under lateral loads", Struct. Eng. Mech., 21(4), 469-494. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2005.21.4.469
  16. Cavaleri, L. and Papia, M. (2014), "An output-only stochastic parametric approach for the identification of linear and nonlinear structures under random base excitations: Advances and comparisons", Probab. Eng. Mech., 35, 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.probengmech.2013.10.010
  17. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (2000), "Building period formulas for estimating seismic displacements", Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 533-536. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586125
  18. Chrysostomou, C.Z. (1991), "Effects of degrading infill walls on the nonlinear seismic response of two-dimensional steel frames", Ph.D. Dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
  19. Chrysostomou, C.Z., Gergely, P. and Abel, J.F. (2002), "A six-strut model for nonlinear dynamic analysis of steel infilled frames", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 2(3), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219455402000567
  20. Chrysostomou, C.Z. and Asteris, P.G. (2012), "On the in-plane properties and capacities of infilled frames", Eng. Struct., 41, 385-402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.057
  21. Crisafulli, F.J. (1997), "Seismic behaviour of reinforced concrete structures with masonry infills", Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Canterbury, New Zealand.
  22. Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. (2004), "Period-height relationship for existing European reinforced concrete buildings", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(1), 93-119.
  23. Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. (2006), "Simplified equations for estimating the period of vibration of existing buildings", Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, September.
  24. Crowley, H. and Pinho, R. (2010), "Revisiting Eurocode 8 formulae for periods of vibration and their employment in linear seismic analysis", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 39(2), 223-235. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.949
  25. Dhanasekar, M. and Page, A.W. (1986), "Influence of brick masonry infill properties on the behaviour of infilled frames", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 81(2), 593-605. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1986.463
  26. Dolsek, M. and Fajfar, P. (2004), "Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34, 49-66.
  27. Dorji, J. (2009), "Seismic performance of brick infilled RC frame structures in low and medium rise buildings in Bhutan", Master Thesis, Queensland University of Technology.
  28. E.A.K. (2003), Greek Earthquake Resistant Design Code, Earthquake Design and Protection Organization (OASP) and Technical Chamber of Greece (TEE), Athens.
  29. Egyptian Seismic Code (1988), Regulations for Earthquake Resistant Design of Buildings in Egypt, Egyptian Society for Earthquake Engineering, Cairo, Egypt
  30. El-Dakhakhni, W.W., Elgaaly, M. and Hamid, A.A. (2003), "Three-strut model for concrete masonryinfilled frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 129(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(177)
  31. European Committee for Standardization CEN (2004), Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. EuropeanStandard EN 1998-1:2004.
  32. FEMA-274 (1997), NEHRP Commentary on the Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington (DC), Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  33. FEMA-306 (1998), Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings: basic procedures manual, Washington (DC), Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  34. FEMA 450 (2003), NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures. Part 1: Provisions, Washington (DC), Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  35. Goel, R.K. and Chopra, A.K (1997), "Period formulas for moment-resisting frame buildings", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 123(11), 1454-61. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:11(1454)
  36. Guler, K., Yuksel, E. and Kocak, A. (2008), "Estimation of the fundamental vibration period of existing RC buildings in Turkey utilizing ambient vibration records", J. Earthq. Eng., 12(S2), 140-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460802013909
  37. Hatzigeorgiou, G. D. and Kanapitsas, G. (2013), "Evaluation of fundamental period of low-rise and mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 42(11), 1599-1616. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2289
  38. Hetenyi, M. (1946), "Beams on elastic foundations", University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.
  39. Holmes, M. (1961), "Steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 19(2), 473-478. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1961.11305
  40. Hong, L.L. and Hwang, W.L. (2000), "Empirical formula for fundamental vibration periods of reinforced concrete buildings in Taiwan", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29(3), 326-333.
  41. Internal Conference of Building Officials (1997), Uniform Building Code, California, Wilier.
  42. Israel IC-413 (1994) SI 413 Design provision for Earthquake Resistant of structures, Standard Institute of Israel 1988.
  43. Jordanian National Building Council (2005), Jordanian National Building Code for Earthquake-Resistant Buildings, Amman, Jordan.
  44. Kakaletsis, D.J. and Karayannis, C.G. (2009), "Experimental investigation of infilled reinforced concrete frames with openings", ACI Struct. J., 106(2), 132-141.
  45. Kaushik, H.B., Rai, D.C. and Jain, S.K. (2006), "Code approaches to seismic design of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames: a state-of-the-art review", Earthq. Spectra, 22(4), 961-983. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2360907
  46. Kose, M.M. (2009), "Parameters affecting the fundamental period of RC buildings with infill walls", Eng. Struct., 31(1), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.017
  47. LH logismiki (2013), FESPA 10 for windows, v.5.4.0.100, Athens, Greece.
  48. Liauw, T.C. and Kwan, K.H. (1984), "Nonlinear behaviour of non-integral infilled frames", Comput. Struct., 18(3), 551-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(84)90070-1
  49. Mainstone, R.J. (1962), "Discussion on steel frames with brickwork and concrete infilling", Proceedings of The Institution of Civil Engineers, 23, 94-99.
  50. Mainstone, R.J. (1971), "On the stiffnesses and strengths of infilled frames", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, 57-90.
  51. Mainstone, R.J. (1974), "Supplementary note on the stiffness and strengths of infilled frames", Current Paper CP 13/74, Building Research Station, Garston, Watford, U.K.
  52. Mainstone, R.J. and Weeks, G.A. (1970), "The influence of bounding frame on the racking stiffness and strength of brick walls", Proceedings of the 2nd International Brick Masonry Conference, Building Research Establishment, Watford, England.
  53. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), " Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  54. Martinez-Rueda, J.E. and Elnashai, A.S. (1997), "Confined concrete model under cyclic load", Mater. Struct., 30(3), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02486385
  55. Masi, A. and Vona, M. (2010), "Experimental and numerical evaluation of the fundamental period of undamaged and damaged RC frames buildings", Bull. Earthq. Eng., Special Issue Ambient Noise, 8(3), 643-656.
  56. Mehrabi, A.B., Shing, P.B., Schuller, M. and Noland, J. (1966), "Experimental evaluation of masonryinfilled RC frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 122(3), 228-237. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1996)122:3(228)
  57. Menegotto, M. and Pinto, P.E. (1973), "Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending", Symposium on the Resistance and Ultimate Deformability of Structures Acted on by Well Defined Repeated Loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland.
  58. Moghaddam, H.A. (2004), "Lateral load behavior of masonry infilled steel frames with repair and retrofit", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130(1), 56-63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:1(56)
  59. Moghaddam, H.A. and Dowling, P.J. (1987), "The State of the Art in Infilled Frames", ESEE Research Report No. 87-2, Imperial College of Science and Technology, Civil Engineering Department, London, U.K.
  60. Morales, M.D. (2000), "Fundamental period of vibration for reinforced concrete buildings", Master Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
  61. National Research Council (1995), The National Building Code (NBC), Canada.
  62. New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) (2006), Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes, Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings.
  63. Page, A.W., Kleeman, P.W. and Dhanasekar, M. (1985), "An in-plane finite element model for brick masonry", Proceedings of a session held in conjunction with Structures Congress'85, Chicago.
  64. Polyakov, S.V. (1960), "On the interaction between masonry filler walls and enclosing frame when loading in the plane of the wall", Translation in Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, San Francisco.
  65. Saneinejad, A. and Hobbs, B. (1995), "Inelastic design of infilled frames", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 121(4), 634-650. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:4(634)
  66. Santhi, M.H., Knight, G.M.S. and Muthumani, K. (2005), "Evaluation of seismic response of soft-storey infilled frames", Comput. Concrete, 2(6), 423-437. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2005.2.6.423
  67. Santhi, M.H., Knight, G.M.S. and Muthumani, K. (2005), "Evaluation of seismic performance of gravity load designed reinforced concrete frames", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 19(4), 277-282. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2005)19:4(277)
  68. Seismic Code of Costa Rica (1986), Federal College of Engineers and Architects of Costa Rica, Department of Design, Ministry of Construction.
  69. SeismoSoft (2013), "SeismoStruct - A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures", Seismosoft Ltd., Pavia, Italy, v.6.5.200, http://www.seismosoft.com.
  70. Smith, B.S. (1962), "Lateral stiffness of infilled frames", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 88(6), 183-199.
  71. Smith, B.S. (1966), "Behavior of square infilled frames", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 92(1), 381-403.
  72. Smith, B.S. (1967), "Methods for predicting the lateral stiffness and strength of multi-storey infilled frames", Build. Sci., 2(3), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-3628(67)90027-8
  73. Smith, B.S. and Carter, C. (1969), "A method of analysis for infilled frames", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 44(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1969.7290
  74. Thomas, F.G. (1953), "The strength of brickwork", Struct. Eng., 31(2), 35-46.
  75. Venezuelan Seismic Code (1988), Regulations for Earthquake Resistant Buildings, Comision De Normas Industriales, Covenin, Caracas, Venezuela.
  76. Wood, R.H. (1958), "The stability of tall buildings", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 11(1), 69-102. https://doi.org/10.1680/iicep.1958.2424
  77. Wood, R.H. (1959), "Discussion on the Stability of tall buildings", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, 12(4), 517-518.
  78. Young, K. and Adeli, H. (2013). "Fundamental period of irregular concentrically braced steel frame structures", The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(16), 1211-1224. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1136

피인용 문헌

  1. The FP4026 Research Database on the fundamental period of RC infilled frame structures vol.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2016.10.002
  2. Prediction of the Fundamental Period of Infilled RC Frame Structures Using Artificial Neural Networks vol.2016, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/5104907
  3. Fundamental period of masonry infilled moment-resisting steel frame buildings vol.26, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.1342
  4. Cyclic testing and parametric analyses of the fabricated steel frames infilled with autoclaved aerated concrete panels vol.20, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1177/1369433216659288
  5. Fundamental period of infilled RC frame structures with vertical irregularity vol.61, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.61.5.663
  6. Estimation of fundamental period of reinforced concrete shear wall buildings using self organization feature map vol.63, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.63.2.237
  7. A simple approach for the fundamental period of MDOF structures vol.13, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2017.13.3.231
  8. Strengthening/Retrofitting Techniques on Unreinforced Masonry Structure/Element Subjected to Seismic Loads: A Literature Review vol.12, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874836801812010251
  9. Fundamental periods of reinforced concrete building frames resting on sloping ground vol.14, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2018.14.4.305
  10. The effect of mortar type and joint thickness on mechanical properties of conventional masonry walls vol.67, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.67.6.579
  11. Contribution of RC columns and masonry wall to the shear resistance of masonry infilled RC frames containing different in size window and door openings vol.172, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.007
  12. The investigation of seismic performance of existing RC buildings with and without infill walls vol.22, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2018.22.5.439
  13. In-plane response of masonry infilled RC framed structures: A probabilistic macromodeling approach vol.68, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.68.4.423
  14. Empirical Period-Height Relationship for reinforced Concrete Moment Resisting Buildings in India vol.481, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/481/1/012018
  15. Estimation of fundamental natural period of vibration for reinforced concrete shear walls systems vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2019.16.3.295
  16. Experimental damage evaluation of prototype infill wall based on forced vibration test vol.8, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2019.8.2.077
  17. Seismic Loss Estimation in Pre-1970 Residential RC Buildings: The Role of Infills and Services in Low-Mid-Rise Case Studies vol.6, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2020.589230
  18. A simplified method for estimating the fundamental period of masonry infilled reinforced concrete frames vol.74, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.74.6.821
  19. Influence of openings of infill wall on seismic vulnerability of existing RC structures vol.75, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.75.2.211
  20. Machine learning and nonlinear models for the estimation of fundamental period of vibration of masonry infilled RC frame structures vol.216, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110765
  21. Seismic collapse risk of RC frames with irregular distributed masonry infills vol.76, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.76.3.421
  22. Seismic behaviour of masonry infilled hinged steel frames with openings: experimental and numerical studies vol.19, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01040-6
  23. New fundamental period formulae for soil-reinforced concrete structures interaction using machine learning algorithms and ANNs vol.144, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106656
  24. Seismic design method for preventing column shear failure in reinforced concrete frames with infill walls vol.44, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102963