DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differentiation of Beef and Fish Meals in Animal Feeds Using Chemometric Analytic Models

  • Yang, Chun-Chieh (Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory) ;
  • Garrido-Novell, Cristobal (Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering, Non-Destructive Spectral Sensors Unit, University of Cordoba) ;
  • Perez-Marin, Dolores (Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering, Non-Destructive Spectral Sensors Unit, University of Cordoba) ;
  • Guerrero-Ginel, Jose E. (Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering, Non-Destructive Spectral Sensors Unit, University of Cordoba) ;
  • Garrido-Varo, Ana (Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry Engineering, Non-Destructive Spectral Sensors Unit, University of Cordoba) ;
  • Cho, Hyunjeong (Experiment & Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service) ;
  • Kim, Moon S. (Environmental Microbial and Food Safety Laboratory)
  • Received : 2015.05.13
  • Accepted : 2015.05.30
  • Published : 2015.06.01

Abstract

Purpose: The research presented in this paper applied the chemometric analysis to the near-infrared spectral data from line-scanned hyperspectral images of beef and fish meals in animal feeds. The chemometric statistical models were developed to distinguish beef meals from fish ones. Methods: The meal samples of 40 fish meals and 15 beef meals were line-scanned to obtain hyperspectral images. The spectral data were retrieved from each of 3600 pixels in the Region of Interest (ROI) of every sample image. The wavebands spanning 969 nm to 1551 nm (across 176 spectral bands) were selected for chemometric analysis. The partial least squares regression (PLSR) and the principal component analysis (PCA) methods of the chemometric analysis were applied to the model development. The purpose of the models was to correctly classify as many beef pixels as possible while misclassified fish pixels in an acceptable amount. Results: The results showed that the success classification rates were 97.9% for beef samples and 99.4% for fish samples by the PLSR model, and 85.1% for beef samples and 88.2% for fish samples by the PCA model. Conclusion: The chemometric analysis-based PLSR and PCA models for the hyperspectral image analysis could differentiate beef meals from fish ones in animal feeds.

Keywords

References

  1. Brookes, G. 2001. The EU animal feed sector: protein ingredient use and implications of the ban on use of meat and bonemeal. Brookes West, Jasmine House, Kent, UK.
  2. Elmasry, G., D. F. Barbin, D. W. Sun and P. Allen. 2012. Meat quality evaluation by hyperspectral imaging technique: an overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 52(8):689-711. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2010.507908
  3. Garrido-Novell, C., A. Garrido-Varo, D. Perez-Marin, J. E. Guerrero-Ginel and M. S. Kim. 2015. Quantification and spatial characterization of moisture and NaCl content of Iberian dry-cured ham slices using NIR hyperspectral imaging. Journal of Food Engineering 153:117-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.09.035
  4. Godoy, J. L., J. R. Vega and J. L. Marchetti. 2014. Relationships between PCA and PLS-regression. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 130:182-191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2013.11.008
  5. He, H.-J., D. Wu and D.-W. Sun. 2014. Potential of hyperspectral imaging combined with chemometric analysis for assessing and visualising tenderness distribution in raw farmed salmon fillets. Journal of Food Engineering 126:156-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.11.015
  6. Jung, D., M. S. Kim, K. Chao, H. Lee, H. Y. Lee and B. Cho. 2013. Detection algorithm for cracks on the surface of tomatoes using multispectral Vis/NIR reflectance imagery. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 38(3):199-207. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2013.38.3.199
  7. Lee, H. Y., C.-C. Yang, M. S. Kim, J. Lim, B. Cho, K. Chao, A. Lefcourt and C. Everard. 2014. A simple multispectral imaging algorithm for detection of defects on Red Delicious apples. Journal of Biosystems Engineering 39(2):142-149. https://doi.org/10.5307/JBE.2014.39.2.142
  8. Riccioli, C., D. Perez-Marin, J. E. Guerrero-Ginel, J. E. Guerrero-Gienl and A. Garrido-Varo. 2011. Pixel selection for near-infrared chemical imaging (NIR-CI) discrimination between fish and terrestrial animal species in animal protein by-product meals. Applied Spectroscopy 65(7): 771-781. https://doi.org/10.1366/10-06177
  9. Wester, J. A., T. Kourti and J. F. Macgregor. 1998. Analysis of multiblock and hierarchical PCA and PLS models. Journal of Chemometrics 12(5):301-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-128X(199809/10)12:5<301::AID-CEM515>3.0.CO;2-S
  10. Worley, B., S. Halouska and R. Powers. Utilities for quantifying separation in PCA/PLS-DA scores plots. Analytical Biochemistry 433(2):102-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2012.10.011
  11. Yang, C.-C., K. Chao, M. S. Kim, D. E. Chan, H. L. Early and M. Bell. 2010. Machine vision system for on-line wholesomeness inspection of poultry carcasses. Poultry Science 89(6):1252-1264. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2008-00561
  12. Yang, C.-C., M. S. Kim, P. Millner, K. Chao, B.-K. Cho, C. Mo, H. Lee and D. E. Chan. 2014. Development of multispectral imaging algorithm for detection of frass on mature red tomatoes. Postharvest Biology and Technology 93(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2014.01.022

Cited by

  1. Non-destructive evaluation of bacteria-infected watermelon seeds using visible/near-infrared hyperspectral imaging vol.97, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.7832