DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pansharpening Method for KOMPSAT-2/3 High-Spatial Resolution Satellite Image

아리랑 2/3호 고해상도 위성영상에 적합한 융합기법

  • 오관영 (서울시립대학교 공간정보공학과) ;
  • 정형섭 (서울시립대학교 공간정보공학과) ;
  • 정남기 (서울시립대학교 공간정보공학과)
  • Received : 2015.03.27
  • Accepted : 2015.04.22
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

This paper presents an efficient image fusion method to be appropriate for the KOMPSAT-2 and 3 satellites. The proposed method is based on the well-established component substitution (CS) approach. The proposed method is divided into two parts: 1) The first step is to create a intensity image by the weighted-averaging operation of a multi-spectral (MS) image and 2) the second step is to produce an optimal high-frequency image using the statistical properties of the original MS and panchromatic (PAN) images. The performance of the proposed method is evaluated in both quantitative and visual analysis. Quantitative assessments are performed by using the relative global dimensional synthesis error (Spatial and Spectral ERGAS), the image quality index (Q4), and the spectral angle mapper index (SAM). The qualitative and quantitative assessment results show that the fusion performance of the proposed method is improved in both the spectral and spatial qualities when it is compared with previous CS-based fusion methods.

본 논문은 아리랑 2호와 3호에 대한 고해상 다분광 영상 제작을 위한 효과적인 영상융합 기법을 제시한다. 제안된 기법은 널리 알려져 있는 CS 기반의 영상융합 기법을 기본으로 하고 있다. 제안된 기법의 융합 과정은 크게 두 가지 단계로 구분할 수 있다. 첫 번째는 가중 평균된 다분광 영상을 이용한 Intensity 영상의 제작 단계와 두 번째는 최적화된 융합 매개변수를 통한 고주파 영상의 생성 단계이다. 제안된 기법에서는 기존의 방법을 개선한 다른 새로운 형식의 융합 매개변수를 정의하였으며, 이는 고주파 영상, 전정색 영상과 다분광 영상 간 공분산/분산 비를 이용하여 도출된다. 본 알고리즘의 평가를 위해서 기존의 융합 방법들의 결과와 정량적, 시각적 비교분석을 수행하였다. 정량적 분석에는 Spatial ERGAS, Spectral ERGAS, SAM, Q4 평가 지표가 사용되었다. 분석결과, 제안된 기법은 기존의 CS 기반의 영상융합 기법에 비하여 공간적/분광적인 측면에서 모두 향상된 결과를 나타냈다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aiazzi, B., L. Alparone, S. Baronti, and A. Garzelli, 2002. Context-Driven fusion of high spatial and spectral data based on oversampled multiresolution analysis, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 40(10): 2300-2312. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.803623
  2. Aiazzi, B., S. Baronti, and M. Selva, 2007. Improving component substitution pansharpening through multivariate regression of MS+PAN data, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(10): 3230-3239. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.901007
  3. Aiazzi, B., S. Baronti, F. Lotti, and M. Selva, 2009. A comparison between global and context-adaptive pansharpening of multispectral images, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 6(2): 302-306. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2008.2012003
  4. Alparone, L., L. Wald, J. Chanussot, C. Thomas, P. Gamba, and L.M. Bruce, 2007, Comparison of pansharpening algorithms: Outcome of the 2006 GRS-S data-fusion contest, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(10): 3012-3021. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.904923
  5. Choi, J.-W., 2010. Hybrid pansharpening algorithm of high-spatial resolution satellite images by extracting automatic parameter based on spatial correlation, Ph.D. dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea (in Korean with English abstract).
  6. Garzelli, A., F. Nencini, and L. Capobianco, 2008. Optimal MMSE pan sharpening of very high resolution multispectral images, IEEE Transaction on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 46(1): 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.907604
  7. Kruse, F.A., A.B. Lefkoff, J.W. Boardman, K.B. Heidebrecht, A.T. Shapiro, P.J. Barloon, and A.F.H. Goetz, 1993. The spectral image processing system (SIPS): interactive visualization and analysis of imageing spectrometer data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 44(2): 145-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90013-N
  8. Leung, Y. and J. Liu, 2014. An improved adaptive intensity-hue-saturation method for the fusion of remote sensing images, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 11(5): 985-989. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2013.2284282
  9. Lillo-Saavedra, M. and C. Gonzalo, 2006. Spectral or spatial quality for fused satellite imagery? A trade-off solution using the wavelet a trous algorithm, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 27(7): 1453-1464. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160500462188
  10. Oh, K.-Y., H.-S. Jung, N.-K. Jeong, and K.-J. Lee, 2014. The comparative analysis of image fusion results by using KOMPSAT-2/3 images, Journal of the Korean Society of Surveying, Geodesy, Photogrammetry and Cartography, 32(2): 117-132 (in Korean with English abstract).
  11. Rahmani, S., M. Strait, D. Merkurjev, M. Moeller, and T. Wittman, 2010. An adaptive IHS pansharpening method, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 7(4): 746-750. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2010.2046715
  12. Ranchin, T. and L. Wald, 2000. Fusion of high spatial and spectral resolution images: the ARSIS concept and its implementation, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(1): 49-61.
  13. Sangwine S.J. and T.A. Ell, 2000, Colour image filters based on hypercomplex convolution, IEEE Proceedings-Vision, Image and Signal Processing, 147(2): 89-93. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-vis:20000211
  14. Tu, T.M., S.C. Su, H.C. Shyu, and P.S. Huang, 2001. A new look at IHS-like image fusion methods, Information Fusion, 2(3): 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1566-2535(01)00036-7
  15. Tu, T.M., P.S. Huang, C.L. Hung, and C.P. Chang, 2004. A fast intensity-hue-saturation fusion technique with spectral adjustment for IKONOS imagery, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 1(4): 309-312. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2004.834804
  16. Vaidyanathan, P.P., 1992. Multirate systems and Filter banks, Dorling Kindersley, London.
  17. Wald, L., T. Ranchin, and M. Mangolini, 1997. Fusion of satellite images of different spatial resolutions: Assessing the quality of resulting images, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 63(6): 691-699.
  18. Wang, Z. and A.C. Bovik, 2002, A Universal Image Quality Index, IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 9(3): 81-84. https://doi.org/10.1109/97.995823
  19. Yocky, D.A., 1996. Artifacts in wavelet image merging, Optical Engineering, 35(7): 2094-2101. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.600765
  20. Zhang, Y., 2004. Understanding image fusion, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70(6): 657-661.

Cited by

  1. Comparison Analysis of Quality Assessment Protocols for Image Fusion of KOMPSAT-2/3/3A vol.32, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2016.32.5.5
  2. Pansharpening Using Guided Filtering to Improve the Spatial Clarity of VHR Satellite Imagery vol.11, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060633
  3. 소형객체 변화탐지를 위한 화소기반 변화탐지기법의 성능 비교분석 vol.37, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2021.37.2.1