DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Middle school Teacher's Perception on 'Free Learning Semester'

자유학기제에 대한 중학교 교사들의 인식

  • Received : 2015.03.02
  • Accepted : 2015.04.27
  • Published : 2015.04.30

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate how middle school teachers perceived major features of the 'Free Learning Semester'. In 2013, the Free Learning Semester has been proposed by Korean government to provide students with the educational programs which deals with various activities in classroom in order to increase student's learning ability. The Free Learning Semester helps students to figure out their dreams and develops their talents. The government plans to expand the Free Learning Semester to all middle schools by 2016. Since teacher's perception is an important matter in the application of the Free Learning Semester, this study seeks to document the changes in curriculum by observing the perception of teachers in the school that implemented the Free Learning Semesters and those that did not implemented the Free Learning Semesters. 172 teachers from nine middle schools in Busan that their school schedules allowed were surveyed. Two school which operated the Free Learning Semester were compared to seven schools which did not operate the Free Learning Semester. The results are summarized as follows: First, almost all (97.7%) teachers in the Free Learning Semester schools have completed a training whereas 74.6% of the teachers in the non-Free Learning Semester schools have not. The usefulness of the training was satisfactory, but the teachers in the Free Learning Semester Schools wanted more practical help with the curriculum. Second, the result, which was statistically significant(p<.05), revealed that the first grade second semester of middle school was the best time to implement the Free Learning Semester. In order for its successful establishment in schools, there needs to be a reliable and effective evaluation system. However, the results regarding the introduction and management of the new system were not statistically significant. Lastly, in the Free Learning Semester Schools, the changes in teachers' perception were statistically significant (p<.05). The results show that the teachers need the training and the teacher's community to implement the curriculum and set a basis for valuation.

Keywords

References

  1. Busan Metropolitan City Office of Education(2013). Report 'Free Learning Semester' of Baekyang Middle School, Busan: BMOE.
  2. Chae, Jung-Hyun(2013). A Scheme for Free Learning Semester with Implementing Integrated Subjects Teaching. Korea Home Economics Education Association, 2013 2nd Career Education Forum, 52-61.
  3. Choi, Sang-Deok, Shin, Cheol-Kyun & Park, Kyun-Yul(2013). Implementation Strategy of Free Learning Semester. KEDI Position Paper PP 2013-01-1, 1-115.
  4. Choi, Sang-Deok, Lee, Sang-Eun, Kim, Byung-Chan, Park, So-Young, So, Gyung-Hee, Hong, Chang-Nam(2014) A Synthetic Report of Case Analysis for Free Learning Semester School in 2013. Seoul; KEDI, CR 2014-19, 1-183.
  5. Choi, Soon-Hwa, Kim, Eun-Suk, Kwon, Oh-Kyoung, Oh, Chang-Ho & Park, Kuk-Tae(2008). A Survey of the Actual Conditions of Operation and Perceptions of Science Teachers and Students Regarding the 7th Elective-Centered Curriculum of High School Science Subjects, Journal of the Korean Chemical Society, 52(1), 96-106. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2008.52.1.096
  6. Department of Education and Science(1993). Transition Year Programme, Guidelines for Schools, Dublin: Department of Education, Ireland.
  7. Eoum, Hee-Sook & Moon, Seong-Bae(2014). An Examination on Teachers' and Students' Perception of Converged Science Introduced by the 2009 Revised High School Curriculum as well as its Actual Implementation. Journal of the Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 7(2), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2014.7.2.203
  8. Jeffers. G.(2007). Attitudes to Transition Year. A Report to the Department of Education and Science. Dublin: Department of Education, Ireland.
  9. Jeon, Yoon-sik(2004). Teachers for Psychology, Goyang: Sehyun-sa.
  10. Jeong Kwang-soon(2013), Approach to Designing and Implementing Integrated Subjects Teaching in Middle School, Journal of Curriculum Integration 2013, 7(3), 1-30
  11. Jeong, Jin-Cheol, Kim, Na-Ra & Choi, Ji-won(2013). Narrative Inquiry of Irish Transition Year and English Gap Year as Experiential Career Education Based on Human Philosophy of Education. Journal of Agricultural and Human Resource Development, 45(3), 85-124. https://doi.org/10.23840/agehrd.2013.45.3.85
  12. Jones, A.(2004). Review of gap year provision. London: Department for Education and Skills.
  13. Jones, A.(2013). Reflecting on the UK gap year: Insights for South Korea's 'Free Learning Semester'. (pp. 45-54). 2013 2nd Career Education Forum, Seoul, KRIVET.
  14. Kim, Jin-Sook(2013a). A Study of Transition Year Curriculum in Ireland, The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31(4), 165-193. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.31.4.201312.007
  15. Kim, Jin-Sook(2013b). Comparison of Curriculums between 'Transition Year' in Ireland and 'Free Learning Semester' in Korea. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 23(6), 163-183.
  16. Kim, Na-Ra, Lee, Ji-Yeon, Jeong, Yun-Kyeong, Choi, Su-Jeong, Bang, Jae-Hyun & Choi, Ji-Won(2013). A Study on the Application of the Irish Transition Year Programme in Korea, The Journal of Career Education Research, 26(1), 21-46.
  17. Kim, Soon-Ju(2013). A Scheme for Free Learning Semester with Implementing Integrated Subjects Teaching. Korea Home Economics Education Association, 2013 2nd Career Education Forum, 62-66.
  18. King, A.(2011). Minding the gap? Young people's accounts of taking a Gap Year as a form of identity work in higher education. Journal of Youth Studies, 14(3), 41-357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2010.489602
  19. Lee, Ji-Yeon(2013). A Scheme for Free Learning Semester with Implementing Integrated Subjects Teaching. Korea Home Economics Education Association, 2013 2nd Career Education Forum, 23-51.
  20. Lee, Ki-Bong, Kim, Hyun-Cheol, Yoon, Hye-Soon & Song, Min-Gyung(2011). Development of a Community-Based Operational Model for Experience-Based Creative Activity I. National Youth Policy Institute, 11-R02, 1-157.
  21. Ministry of Education(2014). Retrieved October 15, 2014 from http://freesem.moe.go,kr.
  22. Ministry of Education(2013). Press Release at 28 May, 2013. (Retrieved October 15, 2014 from www.moe.go.kr.)
  23. Ministry of Education(2013). Revised Making & Management of School Register, Seoul: Daehan textbook Publishing.
  24. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology(2010), Plan for Integrated Career Education, Seoul: Daehan textbook Publishing.
  25. Park, Sam-Cheol(2013). Suggestion for Korea Education from Australian IBP Project. KEDI Current Issue Report CP2013-01-4, 1-31.
  26. Sternberg, R. J. & Williams, W. M. (2003) Educational Psychology. Seoul; Sigma Press. 280-295.
  27. Shin, Cheol-Gyun, Kim, Eun-Young, Hwang, Eun-Hee, Song, Gyoung-Oh, Park, Min-Jeong(2014). A Study of Becoming Established for Free Learning Semester, Seoul; KEDI, RR 2014-17,1-361.
  28. Simpson, K.(2005). Dropping out or signing up? The professionalization of youth travel, Antipode, 37(3), 447-469. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00506.x
  29. Yoon, heo-Jeong, Yoon, Won-Jeong & Woo, Ae-Ja(2011). High School Teachers' Perceptions of the 2009 Revised Science Curriculum and the Science Textbook, Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 15(3), 757-776. https://doi.org/10.24231/rici.2011.15.3.757

Cited by

  1. An Analysis of School Change of A Middle School according to the Free Semester Policy vol.14, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.1.33
  2. Filling in the gaps: A theoretical grounding for an education programme for adolescent socioemotional and vocational development in Ireland vol.6, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3112