World Technopolis Review

World Technopolis Association (세계과학도시연합)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Building Effective Bridges between Science Parks and Universities

  • Received : 2014.09.11
  • Accepted : 2015.02.05
  • Published : 2015.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper examines begins by examining the priorities of the different stakeholders in universities. It then lists some unique technology transfer models practiced by both universities and companies. This is followed by a discussion on the current models of universities and businesses, and science parks and universities. The paper then recommends a new model for science park university engagement that includes six initiatives to make science parks more relevant to universities.

Keywords

References

  1. Almeida, A., Santos, C., and Rui Silva, M. (2008) "Bridging science to economy: the role of science and technologic parks in innovation strategies in "follower" regions," FEP Working Papers 302, University of Porto, Faculty of Economics.
  2. Anderson, T. R., Daim, T. U., and Lavoie, F. F. (2007) "Measuring the efficiency of university technology transfer," Technovation 27(5):306-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2006.10.003
  3. AUTM (2005) AUTM Licensing Survey: FY 2004, Association of University Technology Managers.
  4. Bakouros, Y. L., Mardas, D. C., and Varsakelis, N. C. (2002) "Science Park, a high tech fantasy?: an analysis of the Science Parks of Greece," Technovation 22(2):123-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(00)00087-0
  5. Battelle Memorial Institute (2007) Characteristics and Trends in North American Research Parks: 21st Century Directions, prepared by Battelle Technology Partnership Practice and developed in cooperation with Association of University Research Parks.
  6. Brennan, J., King, R., and Lebeau, Y (2004) The Role of Universities in the Transformation of Societies, An International Research Project Synthesis Report (London: CHERI, The Open University).
  7. Castells, P., Hall, P. (1994) Technopoles of the World: The Making of the 21th Century Industrial Complexes (London: Routhedge).
  8. Cox, R. N. (1985) "Lessons from 30 years of Science Parks in the USA," in edited by J. M. Gibb, Science Parks and Innovation Centres: Their Economic and Social Impact (Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publications), 17-25.
  9. Druilhe, C., and Garnsey, E. W. (2000) "Emergence and growth of high-tech in Cambridge and Grenoble," Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12:163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856200283054
  10. Etzkowitz, H., Dzisah, J., Ranga, M., and Zhou, C. (2007) "The triple Helix Model of Innovation," Tech monitor Jan-Feb 2007:1-23. Accessed in September 2012. http://www.techmonitor.net/tm/images/7/7d/07jan_feb_sf1.pdf
  11. Felsenstein, D. (1994) "University-related Science Parks-"seedbeds" or "enclaves" of innovation?," Technovation 14 (2):93-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(94)90099-X
  12. Ferguson, R. and Olofsson, C. (2004) "Science Parks and the Development of NTBFs-Location, Survival and Growth," Journal of Technology Transfer 29(1):5-17. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOTT.0000011178.44095.cd
  13. Hansson, F., Husted, K., and Vestergaard, J. (2005) "Second generation Science Parks: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society," Technovation 25(9):1039-1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.03.003
  14. Inkpen, A., and Tsang, E. (2005) "Social capital, networks and knowledge transfer," Academy of Management Review 30(1):146-165. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2005.15281445
  15. Lee, W. H., and Yang, W. T. (2000) "The cradle of Taiwan high technology industry development - Hsinchu Science Park (HSP)," Technovation 20(1):55-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00085-1
  16. Leydesdorff, L., and Etzkowitz, H. (1998) "The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies," Science & Public Policy 25(3):195-203.
  17. Link, A. N., and Scott, J. T. (2006) "University research parks," Journal of Productivity Analysis 25(1-2):43-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-006-7126-x
  18. Lofsten, H., and Lindelof, P. (2002) "Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms-academic-industry links, innovation and markets," Research Policy 31:859-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00153-6
  19. Lofsten, H., and Lindelof, P. (2003) "Determinants for an entrepreneurial milieu: Science Parks and business policy in growing firms," Technovation 23:51-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(01)00086-4
  20. Macdonald, S., and Deng, Y. (2004) "Science Parks in China: a cautionary exploration," International Journal of Technology, Intelligence and Planning 1(1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIP.2004.004923
  21. Massey, D., Quintas, P., and Wield, D. (1992) High-tech Fantasies. Science Parks in Society, Science and Space (London: Routledge).
  22. McAdam, M., and McAdam, R. (2008) "High tech start-ups in University Science Park incubators: The relationship between the start-up's lifecycle progression and use of the incubator's resources", Technovation 28(5):277-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.07.012
  23. McAdam, R., Keogh, W., Galbraith, B., and Laurie, D. (2005) "Defining and Improving Technology Transfer Business and Management Processes in University Innovation Centres," Technovation 25(12):1418-1429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2004.08.002
  24. Mims, C. (2011) Is the Death of Intel Research a Harbinger of Doom for Privately-Funded Technology Research? MIT Technology Review April 4, 2011. Available on http://www.technologyreview.com/view/423534/is-the-deathof-intel-research-a-harbinger-of-doom-for-privatelyfunded-technology/
  25. Miller, R., and Cote, M. (1985) "Growing the next Silicon Valley," Harvard Business Review 63(4):114-123.
  26. Monck, C. S. P., Porter, R. B., Quintas, P., Storey, D. J., and Wynarczyk, P. (1988) Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms (Croom Helm: London).
  27. Narasimhalu, A. D. (2013) "CUGAR: A Model for Open Innovation in Science and Technology Parks," World Technopolis Review 2(1):10-20. https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2013.2.1.10
  28. Peddle, M. T. (1988) "An empirical investigation of the relationship between community characteristics and the presence of industrial parks," Regional Science Perspectives 18(2):14-28.
  29. Phan, P., Siegel, S., and Wright, M. (2005) "Science Parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research," Journal of Business Venturing 20(2):165-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.001
  30. Quintas, P., Wield, D., and Massey, D. (1992) "Academic-industry links and innovation: questioning the Science Park model," Technovation 12(3):161-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(92)90033-E
  31. Siegel, D., Westhead, P., and Wright, M. (2003) "Assessing the impact of Science Parks on the research productivity of firms: exploratory evidence from the UK," International Journal of Industrial Organization 21(9):1357-1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00086-9
  32. Tan, J. (2006) "Growth of industry clusters and innovation: Lessons from Beijing Zhongguancun Science Park," Journal of Business Venturing 21(6):824-850.
  33. The Task Force on Higher Education and Society (2000) Higher Education in developing Countries: peril and promise (New York: World Bank). Available on http://www.tfhe.net/report/overview.htm
  34. The World Bank (2002) Constructing Knowledge Societies: New Challenges for Tertiary Education, Washington DC: The World Bank.
  35. UKSPA (1996) The United Kingdom Science Park Association Annual Report 1996 (Birmingham: The United Kingdom Science Park Association).
  36. Van Dierdonck, R., Debackere, K., and Rappa, M. A. (1991) "An assessment of Science Parks: towards a better understanding of their role in the diffusion of technological knowledge," R&D Management 21(2):109-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb00741.x
  37. Vijayan, J. (2005) "Intel Goes to School," Computerworld Mar. 28, 2005. Available on http://commerce.net/intels-lablet-collaboration-strategy/
  38. Wallsten, S. (2001) "The Role of Government in Regional Technology Development: The Effects of Public Venture Capital and Science Parks," Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, Discussion Paper No. 00-39.
  39. Wessner, C. W. (ed) (2009) Understanding Research, Science and Technology Parks: Global Best Practice, Report of a symposium (Washington DC: National Research Council of The National Academies, National Academies Press).
  40. Westhead, P. (1997) "R&D 'inputs' and 'outputs' of technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks," R&D Management 27(1):45-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9310.00041
  41. Westhead, P., and Batstone, S. (1998) "Independent technology-based firms: the perceived benefits of a Science Park location," Urban Studies 35(12):2197- 2219. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098983845
  42. Westhead, P., and Storey, D. (1995) "Links between higher education institutions and high technology firms," Omega 23(4):345-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00021-F
  43. Zhongguancun Science Park Management Committee (2004) Zhongguancun Science Park Development.

Cited by

  1. Governance Structures to Facilitate Collaboration of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and Science &Technology Parks vol.5, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7165/wtr2016.5.2.108