DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Changes of Teachers' Verbal Feedback in Mathematics Classroom within Chinese Context during Ten Years

  • Li, Na (Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Cao, Yiming (Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong)
  • Received : 2015.03.20
  • Accepted : 2015.03.30
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

In the present study, the changes of mathematics teachers' verbal feedback between ten years ago and later were examined using a coding scheme on the types of teacher verbal feedback. Based on the analysis, it is found that teachers intend to use encouraging strategies to make responses to students ten years later. In addition, the duration used in communication between the teacher and individual student is being longer while the frequency of communication becomes less compared ten years ago. Meanwhile, the difference between good lesson ten years ago and common lesson ten years later is not so apparent. It can be inferred that the quality of teaching has being developed.

Keywords

References

  1. Ball, D. L. (1991). Implementing the Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics: What's All This Talk about Discourse? Arithmetic Teacher 39(3), 44-48. ME 1992i.37177
  2. Ball, D. L. (2003). Mathematical proficiency for all students: Toward a strategic research and development program in mathematics education. Stanta Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
  3. Black, S. (2001). Ask Me a Question: How Teachers Use Inquiry in a Classroom. American School Board Journal 188(5), 43-45.
  4. Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational researcher 33(8), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033008003
  5. Brophy, J. E. (2001). Subject-specific instructional methods and activities (Vol. 8): New York: JAI Press Inc.
  6. Carlsen, W. S. (1991). Questioning in classrooms: A sociolinguistic perspective. Review of educational research 61(2), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543061002157
  7. Cazden, C. B. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
  8. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: Approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44(6), 815-843. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20171
  9. Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers. In: D. B. Aichele & A. F. Croxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, pp. 37-48). Reston, VA: NCTM.
  10. Franke, M. L.; Webb, N. M.; Chan, A. G.; Ing, M., Freund, D. & Battey, D. (2009). Teacher questioning to elicit students' mathematical thinking in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education 60(4), 380-392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109339906
  11. Gall, M. D. (1970). The use of questions in teaching. Review of educational research 40(5), 707-721. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543040005707
  12. Garet, M. S.; Porter, A. C.; Desimone, L.; Birman, B. F. & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American educational research journal 38(4), 915-45. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915
  13. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice 8(3), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
  14. Herbal-Eisenmann, B. A., & Breyfogle, M. L. (2005). Questioning Our Patterns of Questioning. Math. Teach. Middle Sch. 10(9), 484-489. ME 2008a.00125
  15. Knuth, E. & Peressini, D. (2001). Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Math. Teach. Middle Sch. 6(5), 320-325. ME 2002d.02862
  16. Li, Q. (2009). 教师专业发展的知识基础-教学专长硏究[The fundamental knowledge of teachers' professional development ]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
  17. Martin, M.; Mullis, I. & Chrostowski, S. (2004). TIMSS 2003 technical report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education,Boston College.
  18. Martino, A. M. & Maher, C. A. (1999). Teacher questioning to promote justification and generalization in mathematics: What research practice has taught us? J. Math. Behav. 18(1), 53-78. ME 2002c.02006 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00017-6
  19. McClain, K. & Cobb, P. (2001). An analysis of development of sociomathematical norms in one first-grade classroom. J. Res. Math. Educ. 32(3), 236-266. ME 2005d.01468 https://doi.org/10.2307/749827
  20. Ministry of Education, P. R. C. (2001). [义务教育数学课程标准(实验稿)] Full-time Compulsory Education Mathematics Curriculum Standard (Experimental version). Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
  21. Ministry of Education, P. R. C. (2011). Full-time Compulsory Education Mathematics Curriculum Standard [义务教育数学课程标准]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
  22. Mok, I. A. C. (2006). Shedding light on the East Asian learner paradox: Reconstructing studentcentredness in a Shanghai classroom. Asia Pacific Journal of Education 26(2), 131-142. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188790600932087
  23. O'Connor, M. C. (1998). Language socialization in the mathematics classroom: Discourse practices and mathematical thinking. In: Magdalene Lampert et al. (eds.), Talking mathematics: Studies of teaching and learning in school (pp. 17-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ME 1999f.03834
  24. O'Halloran, K. L. (1998). Classroom discourse in mathematics: A multisemiotic analysis. Linguistics and Education 10(3), 359-388. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(99)00013-3
  25. Olson, J. C.; Knott, L. & Currie, G. (2009). Discursive Practices in College Pre-Calculus Classes. In: L. Knott (Ed.), The Role of Mathematics Discourse in Producing Leaders of Discourse. (pp. 41-59). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing. ME 2014e.00100
  26. Pimm, D. (1987). Speaking mathematically: Communication in mathematics classrooms. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
  27. Sahin, A. & Kulm, G. (2008). Sixth grade mathematics teachers' intentions and use of probing, guiding, and factual questions. J. Math. Teach. Educ. 11(3), 221-241. ME 2009c.00261 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-008-9071-2
  28. Schleppenbach, M.; Flevares, L. M.; Sims, L. M. & Perry, M. (2007). Teachers' responses to student mistakes in Chinese and US mathematics classrooms. Elementary school journal, 108(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1086/525551
  29. Seago, N. (2003). Using Video as an Object of Inquiry for Mathematics Teaching and Learning. Advances in Research on Teaching 10, 259-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1479-3687(03)10010-7
  30. Shi, N. (2012). 义务教育数学课程标准 (2011 版)解读 [Interpretation of Full-time Compulsory Education Mathematics Curriculum Standard (2011)]. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Publishing Group.
  31. Smith, H. & Higgins, S. (2006). Opening classroom interaction: the importance of feedback. Cambridge Journal of Education 36(4), 485-502. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057640601048357
  32. Stein, C. C. (2007). Let's Talk:Promoting Mathematical Discourse in the Classroom. Math. Teach. 101(4), 285-289. ME 2008a.00121
  33. Stigler, J. W. & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding and improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan 79(1), 14-21.
  34. Truxaw, M. (2009). Orchestrating whole group discourse to mediate mathematical meaning. In: L. Knott (Ed.), The Role of Mathematics Discourse in Producing Leaders of Discourse. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast. Monograph 9. (Chapter 7 in this monograph). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing (IAP). ME 2014e.00100
  35. Walshaw, M. & Anthony, G. (2008). The teacher's role in classroom discourse: A review of recent research into mathematics classrooms. Review of educational research 78(3), 516-551. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308320292
  36. Yackel, E. (1996). Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. J. Res. Math. Educ. 27(4), 458-477. ME 1997f.03754 https://doi.org/10.2307/749877
  37. Zahorik, J. A. (1968). Classroom feedback behavior of teachers. Journal of Educational Research 62(4), 147-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1968.10883794