Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (수산해양교육연구)

The Korean Society for Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education (한국수산해양교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Metacognition Interaction based on Robot lesson

로봇활용수업에서의 초인지적 상호작용 분석연구

  • Received : 2014.12.22
  • Accepted : 2015.01.27
  • Published : 2015.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze student's metacognition interaction based on a robot lesson. For this research as an analytical metacognition interaction tool was utilized. The results of this study revealed that, first, elementary school students had more metacognition interaction in middle learning levels but middle school students had more in the low learning level. Second, in the low learning level, middle school students revised the initiated goal strategy of the robot lesson. Third, in all learning levels, students showed much diagnosis and assesment metacognition interaction in the robot lesson. According to this study's results, the robot lesson has a positive effect in facilitating diagnosis meta cognition for processing of task performance. These results could provide effective cues and information on how to improve the robot lesson.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, N.(1980). Meta-cognitive develop- ment and reading. In Rand J. Spiro, Bertram C. Bruce, & William F. Brewer(Ed.). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education, 453-481, Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  2. Flavell, J. H.(1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick(Ed.). The nature of intelligence, 231-235.
  3. Flavell, J. H.(1985). Cognitive development, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  4. Henri, F.(1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A.E. Kaye(ed.). Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  5. Kang, Jong-Pyo(2003). A Study on the Education of Robot in Elementary School. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 16(4), 97-113.
  6. Khan. B. H.(1997). Web-based instruction, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
  7. Kim, Du-Gyu & Kim, Kyung-Hyun(2012). Analyze teacher's lesson language pattern based on lesson of using robot. Journal of Fisheries and Marine Science Education, 24(5), 645-653.
  8. Kim, Kyung-Hyun(2010). The effects of the robot based instruction for problem of students' interaction. Engineering Education Research, 13(6), 164-170. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2010.13.6.164
  9. Kim, Mi-Lyang.Jo, Hye-Gyoung.Lee, Seok-Won Han, Joung-Hye.Han, Kwang-Hyun & Kim, So-mi(2008). An exploratory study on the use of educational robots for enhancing creativity. Korea Education and Research Information Service(RR 2008-8).
  10. Kim, Seok-Woo & Choi, Tae-Jin(2007). Research Methodology in Education. Seoul : Hakjisa.
  11. Laat, M. & Lally, V.(2003). Complexity, theory and praxis: Researching collaborative learning and tutoring processes in a networked learning community. Instructional Science, 31, 7-39. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022596100142
  12. Lee, Kyung-Hee.Ryuh, Young-Sun.Moon, Seong-Hwan (2010), Improvement of Children's Attentiveness through Robot Educational Activities, Journal of Korean practical arts education,
  13. Lee, Sang-Soo(2004). An analysis of interaction patterns in face-to-face and online synchronous/ asynchronous learning environments. Journal of Educational Technology, 20(1), 63-88.
  14. Lee, Sung-Ju(2003). The effects of face-to-face teaching, teacher intervention, collaboration type and metacognition on academic achievement and interaction in learning using CMC, Doctor Degree, Chonnam National University.
  15. Lee, Sung-Ho(2002). The Instructional Method. Seoul : Yangseowon.
  16. Oliver, R. & Omari, A.(1998). Exploring student interaction in collaborative world wide web computer-based learning environments. Journal of Education Multimedia and Hyperamedia, 7(2/3), 263-287.
  17. Park Eung-Sik.Moon, Seong-Hwan(2009), Development and Application of a Robot Education Program for Logical Thinking Ability in Elementary Students, Journal of Korean practical arts education, 22(2), 175-198
  18. Park, Jung-Ho.Cho, Hye-Kyung(2011). A Case Study on Instruction Using Robot in Elementary Regular Classes, Journal of the Korea society of computer and information, 16(8), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2011.16.8.067
  19. Shin, Na-Min.Kim, Sang-A(2007), What do robots have to do with student Learning?, The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 13(3), 79-99
  20. Song, Jeong-Beom.Kwon, Oh-Sung.Koh, Byong-Oh. Yang, Kwon-Woo & Shin, Soo-Bum(2011). The effect of the learners creativity and self-efficacy on the support type of the assistant teacher in robot education. The Journal of Korean association of computer, 14(1), 35-43.
  21. EASY Analysis Instruction Ver 3.2 beta(2009). http://www.edusugar.com