한국경영과학회지 (Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society)

  • 제40권1호
  • /
  • Pages.5-19
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1225-1119(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-4759(eISSN)
한국경영과학회 (The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개방형 혁신 네트워크의 동태적 모형

Dynamic Model for Open Innovation Network

  • Park, Chulsoon (Department of Business Administration, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 투고 : 2014.03.20
  • 심사 : 2014.06.25
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Literatures on open innovation have two major limitations. First, either on a firm level or on an industry level did they analyze the open innovation issues. The results of a firm's innovation can be diffused through the whole network and the firm can learn back from the network knowledge. Prior literatures did not consider the feedback loop among firms and network in which the firms are involved. Second, most open innovation research had a static perspective on firm's innovation performance. Since the diffusion, spill-over and learning among network members are involved over time, the open innovation is intrinsically dynamic. From the dynamic perspective, we can appreciate the fundamental attributes of the open innovation network which involves diverse firms, research institutes, and universities. In order to overcome the limitations, we suggest a dynamic model for open innovation network. We build an agent-based model which consists of heterogeneous firms. The firms are connected through a scale-free network which is formed by preferential attachment. Through the diverse scenario of simulation, we collect massive data on the firm level and analyze them both on firm and industry level. From the analysis, we found that, on industry level, the overall performance of open innovation increases as the internal research capability, absorptive capacity, and learning curve coefficient increase. Noticeably, as the deprecation rate of knowledge increases, the variability of knowledge increases. From the firm level analysis, we found that the industry-level variables had a significant effect on the firm's innovation performance lasting through all the time, whereas the firm-level variables had only on the early phase of innovation.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 김대영, 강복영, 강석호, "구조적 공백 기반 주문 분배 전략의 에이전트 기반 모델링 및 시뮬레이션", 경영과학, 제29권, 제1호(2012), pp.153-168. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2012.29.1.153
  2. 김한중, 박준영, "사례분석을 통한 신제품 개발 환경에서의 크라우드소싱 활용 가이드라인 구축", 대한산업공학회지, 제39권, 제6호(2013), pp.517-534. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2013.39.6.517
  3. 손동원, "개방형 혁신과 흡수역량의 공진화", 경영과학, 제29권, 제3호(2012), pp.169-182. https://doi.org/10.7737/KMSR.2012.29.3.169
  4. 이건창, 한민희, 서영욱, "탐색 및 활용을 통한 컴퓨터 매개 커뮤니케이션의 팀 창의성에 관한 연구", 경영과학, 제28권, 제1호(2011), pp.91-105.
  5. 조찬우, 이성주, "융합기술 개발을 위한 중소기업 간 협업모형 제안", 대한산업공학회지, 제39권, 제3호(2013), pp.198-203. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2013.39.3.198
  6. Ahuja, G., "Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation:A Longitudinal Study," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.45, No.3(2000), pp.425-455.
  7. Argote, L., S.L. Beckman, and D. Epple, "The Persistence and Transfer of Learning in Industrial Settings," Management Science, Vol. 36, No.2(1990), pp.140-154. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.2.140
  8. Barabasi, A.-L., "Scale-Free Networks:A Decade and Beyond," Science, Vol.325, No. 5939 (2009), pp.412-413. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1173299
  9. Barabasi, A.-L. and R. Albert, "Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks," Science, Vol. 286, No.5439(1999), pp.509-512. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.286.5439.509
  10. Barabasi, A.-L. and E. Bonabeau, "Scale-Free Networks," Scientific American, Vol.288, No.5 (2003), pp.60-69. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0503-60
  11. Brantle, T. and M.H. Fallah, Complex Knowledge Networks and Invention Collaboration. IN MINAI, A., BRAHA, D. AND BAR-YAM, Y. (Eds.) Unifying Themes in Complex Systems, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, (2008), pp. 106-113.
  12. Carley, K.M., M.K. Martin, and B.R. Hirshman, "The Etiology of Social Change," Topics in Cognitive Science, Vol.1, No.4(2009), pp.621-650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01037.x
  13. Chesbrough, H. and A.K. Crowther, "Beyond High Tech:Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries," R&D Management, Vol.36, No.3(2006), pp.229-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00428.x
  14. Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverbeke, and J. West, Open Innovation:Researching a New Paradigm, Oxford University Press, New York, 2006.
  15. Chesbrough, H.W., Open Innovation:The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology, Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA, 2003.
  16. Christensen, C., The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail, Harvard Business Review Press, 1997.
  17. Christensen, J.F., M.H. Olesen, and J.S. Kjaer, "The Industrial Dynamics of Open Innovation-Evidence from the Transformation of Consumer Electronics," Research Policy, Vol. 34, No.10(2005), pp.1533-1549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.002
  18. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal, "Absorptive Capacity:A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, No.1(1990), pp.128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  19. Epple, D., L. Argote, and R. Devadas, "Organizational Learning Curves:A Method for Investigating Intra-Plant Transfer of Knowledge Acquired through Learning by Doing," Organization Science, Vol.2, No.1(1991), pp. 58-70. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.58
  20. Epple, D., L. Argote, and K. Murphy, "An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer through Learning by Doing," Operations Research, Vol.44, No.1(1996), pp.77-86. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.44.1.77
  21. Fleming, L. and D.M. Waguespack, "Brokerage, Boundary Spanning, and Leadership in Open Innovation Communities," Organization Science, Vol.18, No.2(2007), pp.165-180. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0242
  22. Gassmann, O., "Opening up the Innovation Process:Towards an Agenda," R&D Management, Vol.36, No.3(2006), pp.223-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00437.x
  23. Gay, B. and B. Dousset, "Innovation and Network Structural Dynamics:Study of the Alliance Network of a Major Sector of the Biotechnology Industry," Research Policy, Vol.34, No.10(2005), pp.1457-1475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.001
  24. Gupta, A.K., P.E. Tesluk, and M.S. Taylor, "Innovation at and across Multiple Levels of Analysis," Organization Science, Vol.18, No.6 (2007), pp.885-897. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0337
  25. Henderson, R.M. and K.B. Clark, "Architectural Innovation:The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of Established Firms," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.35, No.1(1990), pp.9-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  26. Hite, J.M. and W.S. Hesterly, "The Evolution of Firm Networks:From Emergence to Early Growth of the Firm," Strategic Management Journal, Vol.22, No.3(2001), pp.275-286. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.156
  27. Huizingh, E.K.R.E., "Open Innovation:State of the Art and Future Perspectives," Technovation, Vol.31, No.1(2011), pp.2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.002
  28. Kim, H. and Y. Park, "Structural Effects of R&D Collaboration Network on Knowledge Diffusion Performance," Expert Systems with Applications, Vol.36, No.5(2009), pp.8986-8992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.039
  29. Lichtenthaler, U., "Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions," Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, Vol.55, No.1(2008), pp.148-157. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2007.912932
  30. Lichtenthaler, U., "Open Innovation:Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions," The Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol.25, No.1(2011), pp.75-93.
  31. Macal, C.M. and M.J. North, "Tutorial on Agent-Based Modelling and Simulation," Journal of Simulation, Vol.4, No.3(2010), pp.151-162. https://doi.org/10.1057/jos.2010.3
  32. Nair, A. and J.M. Vidal, "Supply Network Topology and Robustness against Disruptions-an Investigation Using Multi-Agent Model," International Journal of Production Research, Vol.49, No.5(2011), pp.1391-1404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2010.518744
  33. Newman, M.E.J., "The Structure of Scientific Collaboration Networks," Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol.98, No.2 (2001), pp.404-409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
  34. Phelps, C., R. Heidl, and A. Wadhwa, "Knowledge, Networks, and Knowledge Networks : A Review and Research Agenda," Journal of Management, Vol.38, No.4(2012), pp.1115-1166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311432640
  35. Powell, W.W., D.R. White, K.W. Koput, and J. Owen-Smith, "Network Dynamics and Field Evolution:The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences," American Journal of Sociology, Vol.110, No.4(2005), pp. 1132-1205. https://doi.org/10.1086/421508
  36. Robertson, P.L. and R.N. Langlois, "Innovation, Networks, and Vertical Integration," Research Policy, Vol.24, No.4(1995), pp.543-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(94)00786-1
  37. Rothaermel, F.T. and A.M. Hess, "Building Dynamic Capabilities:Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects," Organization Science, Vol.18, No.6(2007), pp.898-921. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0291
  38. Schelling, T.C., Micromotives and Macrobehavior, W.W. Norton, New York, 1978.
  39. Spithoven, A., B. Clarysse, and M. Knockaert, "Building Absorptive Capacity to Organise Inbound Open Innovation in Traditional Industries," Technovation, Vol.31, No.1(2011), pp.10-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2010.10.003
  40. Tushman, M.L. and P. Anderson, "Technological Discontinuities and Organizational Environments," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol.31, No.3(1986), pp.439-465. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392832
  41. Van De Vrande, V., W. Vanhaverbeke, and O. Gassmann, "Broadening the Scope of Open Innovation:Past Research, Current State and Future Directions," International Journal of Technology Management, Vol.52, No.3/4(2010), pp.221-235. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2010.035974
  42. Van Eck, P.S., W. Jager, and P.S.H. Leeflang, "Opinion Leaders' Role in Innovation Diffusion: A Simulation Study," Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol.28, No.2 (2011), pp.187-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2011.00791.x
  43. Villarroel, A. and J. Taylor, "An Agent-Based Approach to Examine the Network Knowledge Advantage in Open Innovation Networks: Firm Openness and Interorganizational Network Performance," Proceedings of Agent 2006 Annual Conference, Citeseer, 2006.
  44. Wagner, C.S. and L. Leydesdorff, "Network Structure, Self-Organization, and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science," Research Policy, Vol.34, No.10(2005), pp.1608-1618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.08.002
  45. Watts, D.J. and S.H. Strogatz, "Collective Dynamics of 'Small-World' Networks," Nature, Vol.393, No.6684(1998), pp.440-442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918
  46. Wilensky, U., Netlogo, Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, 1999.