Educational Technology International

The Korean Society for Education Technology (한국교육공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of the Types of Learning Material and Epistemological Beliefs in an Ill-structured Problem Solving

  • Received : 2015.09.03
  • Accepted : 2015.10.15
  • Published : 2015.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of learning achievements and cognitive load according to different types of presenting learning materials and epistemological beliefs (EB). Learning achievements in this study were composed by retention and transfer of ill-structured problem. A total of 80 college students participated in the study. Prior to the learning, students were guided to fill out a questionnaire regarding epistemological beliefs and a prior knowledge test. The students of each group studied with a different type of reading material: full text (FT), full text including key questions (KeyFT) and full text including a concept map (CmFT). After a session of study was finished, they were asked to complete the posttest: retention and transfer. The results showed that there was a significant difference in transfer achievements. CmFT outperformed higher scores than the other types. There was no significant difference in retention among the groups. It is strongly believed that the types of presenting learning materials may have affected the understanding of ill-structured problem solving skills. Students with sophisticated EB showed higher achievements on retention and transfer than naive-EB and mixed-EB. Even though the data showed decrease of the cognitive load on the type of materials and EB, there were no significant differences on the cognitive load. We should consider a positive effect of types of presenting learning materials and EB enhancing capabilities of solving ill-structured problems in real life.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was conducted by research fund from the Gwangju University in 2015.

References

  1. Amadieu, F., Van Gog, T., Paas, F., Tricot, A., & Marine, C. (2009). Effects of prior knowledge and concept-map structure on disorientation, cognitive load, and learning. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 376-386.
  2. Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. Brunken, R., Plass, J. L., & Leutner, D. (2003). Direct measurement of cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 53-61.
  4. Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, I. D. (2002). The effect of concept mapping to enhance text comprehension and summarization. The Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1), 5-23.
  5. Cho, Y. H., Lee, J., & Jonassen, D. H. (2011). The role of tasks and epistemological beliefs in online peer questioning. Computers & Education, 56(1), 112-126.
  6. Ding, L., & Mollohan, K. N. (2015). How College-Level Introductory Instruction Can Impact Student Epistemological Beliefs. Journal of College Science Teaching, 44(4), 19.
  7. Hatlevik, I., & Smeby, J. C. (2015). Programme coherence and epistemological beliefs. Nordic Psychology, (ahead-of-print), 1-18.
  8. Hofer, B. K. (2004). Exploring the dimensions of personal epistemology in differing classroom contexts: Student interpretations during the first year of college. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(2), 129-163.
  9. Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and student's epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 23-35.
  10. Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design model for well-structured and illstructured problem solving learning outcomes. ETR & D, 45(1), 65-94.
  11. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(4), 63-85.
  12. Kardash, C. M., & Howell, K. L. (2000). Effects of epistemological beliefs and topic-specific undergraduates' cognitive and strategic processing of dualpositional text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(2), 524-535.
  13. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2000). Incorporating learner experience into the design of multimedia instruction. Journal of educational psychology, 92(1), 126.
  14. Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., & van Merrienboer, J. J. G., (2005). The management of cognitive load during complex cognitive skill acquisition of complex cognitive skill acquisition by means of computer simulated problem solving. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 1-16.
  15. Kienhues, D., Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2011). Dealing with conflicting or consistent medical information on the Web: when expert information breeds laypersons' doubts about experts. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 193-204.
  16. Kim, S. Y. (2008). The effects of awareness of problem type familiarity and problem relevance on ill-structured problem-solving and achievement. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(2), 105-128.
  17. Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 1-10.
  18. Leahy, W., Hanham, J., & Sweller, J. (2015). High element interactivity information during problem solving may lead to failure to obtain the testing effect. Educational Psychology Review, 27(2), 291-304.
  19. Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Zurlo, G. (2006). Epistemological understanding in different judgment domains: Relationships with gender, grade level, and curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, 45(1), 43-56.
  20. Mayer, R. E., & Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: An experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis. Journal of educational psychology, 83(4), 484.
  21. Mayer, R. E., & Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 715-726.
  22. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (1998). A split-attention effect in multimedia learning: Evidence for dual processing system in working memory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), 312-320.
  23. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.
  24. Mehdinezhad, V., & Bamari, Z. (2015). The Relationship between Test Anxiety, Epistemological Beliefs and Problem Solving among Students. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 4(1), 2-8.
  25. Muis, K. R. (2007). The role of epistemic beliefs in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(3), 173-190.
  26. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. Cambridge University Press.
  27. O'donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86.
  28. Oh, S. A., & Kim, Y. S. (2006). The effect of advance organizer on cognitive load and learning achievement. Journal of Educational Technology, 22(4), 55-82.
  29. Oh, S. A., Kim, Y. S., Jung, E. K., & Kim, H. S. (2009). Effects of different advance organizers on mental model construction and cognitive load decrease. Educational Technology International, 10(2), 145-166
  30. Oh, S, A., & Lee, S. D. (2011). Epistemological beliefs and perspectives about good teacher and good instructional practices between in-service and pre-service teachers. The Journal of Korean Educational Forum, 10(1), 25-45.
  31. Oh, S. A., & Lee, S. D. (2013). Effects of pre-service teachers' epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning on well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education. 30(3), 75-99
  32. Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. Journal of educational psychology, 84(4),429.
  33. Paas, F. G., Van Merrienboer, J. J., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and motor skills, 79(1), 419-430.
  34. Park, B. G., & Chung, Y. J. (2012). Scale revalidation of epistemological beliefs and exploration of their domainality. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 26(3), 739-767.
  35. Pollock, E., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (2002). Assimilating complex information. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 61-86.
  36. Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498-504.
  37. Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 406-411.
  38. Schmeck, A., Opfermann, M., van Gog, T., Paas, F., & Leutner, D. (2015). Measuring cognitive load with subjective rating scales during problem solving: differences between immediate and delayed ratings. Instructional Science, 43(1), 93-114.
  39. Shin, N., Jonassen, D. H., & MaGee, S. (2003). Predictors of well-structured and illstructured problem solving in an astronomy simulation. Journal of Research in science Teaching, 40(1), 7-27.
  40. Spiro, R. J. (1988). Cognitive Flexibility Theory: Advanced Knowledge Acquisition in Ill-Structured Domains. Technical Report, No. 441.
  41. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.
  42. Valanides, N., & Angeli, C.(2005). Effects of instruction on change in epistemological beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 314-330.
  43. Van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B., & Paas, F. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(2), 325-331.
  44. Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., Schuurman, J. G., De Croock, M. B. M., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (2002). Redirecting learners' attention during training: Effects on cognitive load, transfer test performance and training efficiency. Learning and Instruction, 12(1), 11-37.
  45. Verhoeven, L., Schontz, W., & Pass, F. (2009). Cognitive load in interactive knowledge construction. Learning and Instruction, 19(5), 369-375.
  46. Weinberg, F. J. (2015). Epistemological beliefs and knowledge sharing in work teams: Anew model and research questions. The Learning Organization, 22(1), 40-57.