Educational Technology International

  • 제16권1호
  • /
  • Pages.31-57
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1598-5776(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2289-0300(eISSN)
한국교육공학회 (The Korean Society for Education Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Students' Use of Notebook Computers in the College Classroom: Benefits and Pitfalls

  • 투고 : 2015.03.28
  • 심사 : 2015.04.15
  • 발행 : 2015.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study aims to understand the overall experiences of students who use notebook computers in class by using a qualitative approach. Interview data were collected from 23 Korean college students at a Korean university, who use notebook computers in their classes; the data were analyzed through the constant comparison method. The results from this study can be categorized into two themes: the positive and negative effects of using a notebook computer in class, and different perspectives on the effects of using a notebook computer in class. The positive effects of notebook computer usage were specified as production of lecture notes, performing searches for information, management of learning materials, and effective time management. However, behaviors such as perusing other works not associated with the class were indicated as negative effects. The participants had different perceptions about the effect of notebook computer usage in increasing academic performance, although they were satisfied in their experience with notebook computers in general. These results imply that appropriate methods of technology usage are needed and that the support of an instructor is essential to achieve fully beneficial use of notebook computers in class.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aguilar-Roca, N. M., Williams, A. E., & O'Dowd, D. K. (2012). The impact of laptop-free zones on student performance and attitudes in large lectures. Computers & Education, 59, 1300-1308.
  2. Ahn, S. H, & Jeong, Y. S. (2009). Measures to generalize the effect of u-learning. The Journal of the Korea Contents, 9(7), 379-389.
  3. Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245-263.
  4. Byun, H. S. (2009). A research synthesis on one-to-one computing initiatives and exploration for its implementation, Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(1), 97-123
  5. Burns, K., & Polman, J. (2006). The impact of ubiquitous computing in the Internet age: How middle school teachers integrated wireless laptops in the initial stages of implementation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(2), 363-385.
  6. Demb, A., Erickson, D., & Hawkins-Wilding, S. (2004). The laptop alternative: Student reactions and strategic implications. Computers & Education, 43(4), 383-401.
  7. Finn, S., & Inman, J. G. (2004). Digital unity and digital divide: Surveying alumni to study effects of a campus laptop initiative. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 297-317.
  8. Garthwait, A., & Weller, G. H. (2005). A year in the life: Two seventh grade teachers implement one-to-one computing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(4), 361-377.
  9. Gehlen-Baum, V., & Weinberger, A. (2012). Notebook or Facebook? How students actually use mobile devices in large lectures. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 7563, 103-112.
  10. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Co.
  11. Fried, C. B. (2008). In-class laptop use and its effects on student learning. Computers & Education, 50(3), 906-914.
  12. Kay, R. H., & Lauricella, S. (2011). Exploring the benefits and challenges of using laptop computers in higher education classrooms: a formative analysis. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology/La revue canadienne de l'apprentissage et de la technologie, 37(1).
  13. Lee, C., Han, S., & Lee, S. (2009). Study on the analysis of effectiveness of the u-learning research school. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 15(2), 313-332.
  14. Lee, M. (2012). Evaluation and improvement strategies of digital textbook for instructional suitability. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 29(1), 441-467.
  15. Lee, M. H., & Kim, M. R. (2007). Exploring pedagogical potential of UMPC with small group study in elementary school. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 7(8), 215-225.
  16. Ley, K., & Young, D. B. (2001). Instructional principles for self-regulation. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(2), 93-103.
  17. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
  18. Lomas, L., & Ursin, J. (2009). Collegial or Managerial? Academics' Conceptions of Quality in English and Finnish Universities. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 447-460.
  19. Lyu, J. & Byun, H. S. (2012). Latent mean comparison of digital textbook and gender differences in elementary school. The Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 24(3), 617-636.
  20. McCrea, B. (2010). 5 higher education trends to watch in 2010. Campus Technology. http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2009/12/09/5-Higher-Ed-Tech-Trends-To-Watch-in-2010.aspx?p=1. Accessed 14 March 2013.
  21. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  22. Mitra, A., & Steffensmeier, T. (2000). Changes in student attitudes and student computer use in a computer-enriched environment. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 32(3), 417-433.
  23. Mouza, C. (2008). Learning with laptops: Implementation and outcomes in an urban, under-privileged school. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(4), 447-472.
  24. Mouza, C., Cavalier, A., & Nadolny, L. (2008). Implementation and outcomes of a laptop initiative in career and technical high school education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 38, 411-452.
  25. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
  26. Peck, K. L., & Hannafin, M. J. (1983). The effects of notetaking pretraining and the recording of notes on the retention of aural instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 77, 100-107.
  27. Penuel, W. R. (2006). Implementation and effects of one-to-one computing initiatives: A research synthesis. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 329-348.
  28. Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010. Educause, 6, 1-118.
  29. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  30. Trimmel, M., & Bachmann, J. (2004). Cognitive, social, motivational and health aspects of students in laptop classrooms. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 151-158.
  31. Weaver, B. E., & Nilson, L. B. (2005). Laptops in class: What are they good for? what can you do with them? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 101, 3-13.
  32. Wilen-Daugenti, T. (2008). Higher education trends & statistics-Issue 1. http://www.cisco.com/web/about/ac79/edu/trends/issue01.html. Accessed 14 March 2013.
  33. Zhu, E., Kaplan, M., Dershimer, R. C., & Bergom, I. (2011). Use of laptops in the classroom: Research and best practices. CRLT Occasional Papers, 30, 6.
  34. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martienz-Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing students' use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23(4), 614-628.