Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Dong-A University research fund.
References
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2006). Amos for Windows. Analysis of moment structures (Version 7.0). Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corp.
- Aristovnik, A. (2012). The impact of ICT on educational performance and its efficiency in selected EU and OECD countries: A non-parametric analysis. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(11), 144-152.
- Attewell, P., & Battle, J. (1999). Home computers and school performance. The Information Society, 15(1), 1-10.
- Aypay, A. (2010). Information and communication technology (ICT) usage and achievement of Turkish students in PISA 2006. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(2), 116-124.
- Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2001). Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 269-296). Hillsdale, MI: Erlbaum.
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
- Biagi, F., & Loi, M. (2013). Measuring ICT use and learning outcomes: Evidence from recent econometric studies. European Journal of Education, 48(1), 28-42.
- Bocconi, S., Kampylis, P., & Punie, Y. (2012). Innovating teaching and learning practices: Key elements for developing creative classrooms in Europe. eLearning Papers, 30, 1-13. Retrieved January 5, 2015 from http://openeducationeuropa.eu/en/article/Innovating-Teaching-and-Learning-Practices%3A-Key-Elements-for-Developing-Creative-Classrooms-in-Europe
- Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Ed.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Chandra, V., & Lloyd, M. (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1087-1098.
- Collins, L. M, Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C-M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(4), 330-351.
- Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1999). Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: A longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 145-158.
- Curran, P. J., West, S. G., & Finch, J. (1996). The robustness of test statistics to non-normality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 1(1), 16-29.
- Dewey, J., Husted, T. A., & Kenny, L. W. (2000). The ineffectiveness of school inputs: A product of misspecification? Economics of Education Review, 19(1), 27-45.
- Dickhauser, O., & Stiensmeier-Pelster, J. (2003). Gender differences in the choice of computer courses: Applying the expectancy-value model. Social Psychology of Education, 6(3), 173-189.
- EBS (2014). About EBS (Educational Broadcasting System): 2020 VISION. Retrieved May 6, 2014, from http://global.ebs.co.kr/eng/about/vision
- Gumus, S. (2013). Investigating the factors affecting information and communication technology (ICT) usage of Turkish students in PISA 2009. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 102-107.
- Gunduz, H. B. (2010). Digital dvide in Turkish primary schools: Sakarya sample. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 9(1), 43-53.
- Hakkarainen, K., Ilomaki, L., Lipponen, L., Muukkonen, H., Rahikainen, M., Tuominen, T., Lakkala, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2000). Students' skills and practices of using ICT: Results of a national assessment in Finland. Computers & Education, 34(2), 103-117.
- Hendriks, P. (1999). Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing. Knowledge and Process Management, 6(2), 91-100
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in convariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55.
- Isman, A. (2012). Technology and technique: An educational perspective. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 207-213.
- James, R. K., Lamb, C. E., Householder, D. L., & Bailey, M. A. (2000). Integrating science, mathematics, and technology in middle school technology-rich environments: A study of implementation and change. School Science and Mathematics, 100(1), 27-35.
- Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
- Kuhlemeier, H., & Hemker, B. (2007). The impact of computer use at home on students' Internet skills. Computers & Education, 49(2), 460-480.
- Liu, T. C., Wang, H. Y., Liang, J. K., Chan, T. W., Ko, H. W., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Wireless and mobile technologies to enhance teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 19(3), 371-382.
- Liu, X. (2004). Socio-cultural context for online learning: A case study viewed from activity theory perspective. Paper presented at the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Conference, Chicago, IL (pp. 606-613). Bloomington, IN: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
- Mac Callum, K., Jeffrey, L., & Kinshuk (2014). Comparing the role of ICT literacy and anxiety in the adoption of mobile learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 8-19.
- McCarthy, M. (2000). Computers and the internet: Tools for lifelong learning. Journal of Renal Nutrition, 10(1), 44-48.
- Meelissen, M. R. M., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 969-985.
- Papanastasiou, E. (2002). Factors that differentiate mathematics students in Cyprus, Hong Kong, and the USA. Educational Research and Evaluation, 8(1), 129-146.
- Papanastasiou, E., Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2003). When computer use is associated with negative science achievement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 325-332.
- Rainer, R. K., Laosethakul, K., & Astone, M. K. (2003). Are gender perceptions of computing changing over time? Journal of Computer Information Systems, 43(4), 108-114.
- Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323-337.
- Schweingruber, H., Brandenburg, C., & Miller, L. (2001). Middle school students' technology practices and preferences: Re-examining gender differences. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2), 125-140.
- Shih, H. P. (2006). Assessing the effects of self-efficacy and competence on individual satisfaction with computer use: An IT student perspective. Computers in Human Behavior, 22(6), 1012-1026.
- Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology, 13, 290-312.
- Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Baumgartner, H. (1998). Assessing measurement invariance in crossnational consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(1), 78-90.
- Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173-180.
- Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. C.(1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometrics Society, Iowa City, IA.
- Tang, P. S., & Ang, P. H. (2002). The diffusion of information technology in Singapore schools: A process framework. New Media & Society, 4(4), 457-478.
- Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & Van Braak, J. (2008). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494-506.
- Tsai, C. C., & Lin, C. C. (2004). Taiwanese adolescents'perceptions and attitudes regarding the Internet: Exploring gender differences. Adolescence, 39(156), 725-734.
- Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students' Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182-1192.
- Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10.
- Underwood, J. (2004). Research into information and communications technologies: Where now? Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 13(2), 135-145.
- Vekiri, I. (2010). Socioeconomic differences in elementary students' ICT beliefs and out-of-school experiences. Computers & Education, 54(4), 941-950.
- Vekiri, I., & Chronaki, A. (2008). Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1392-1404.
- Volman, M., van Eck, E., Heemskerk, I., & Kuiper, E. (2005). New technologies, new differences. Gender and ethnic differences in pupils' use of ICT in primary and secondary education. Computers & Education, 45(1), 35-55.
- Vrasidas, C., & Glass, G. V. (2002). A conceptual framework for studying distance education. In C. Vrasidas & G. V. Glass (Eds.), Current perspectives in applied information technologies: Distance education and distributed learning (pp. 31-56). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
- Vrasidas, C., & McIsaac, M. (2001). Integrating technology in teaching and teacher education: Implications for policy and curriculum reform. Educational Media International, 38(2/3), 127-132.
- Weaver, G. C. (2000). An examination of the National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS: 88) database to probe the correlation between computer use in school and improvement in test scores. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(2), 121-133.
- Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does it compute? The relationship between educational technology and student achievement in mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Policy Information Center.
- West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. Hoyle (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues and applications (pp. 56-75). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Wilhelm, A. G. (2004). Everyone should know the basics: Equalizing opportunities and outcomes for disadvantaged youths through ICT in education. In A. Karpati (Eds.), Promoting equity through ICT in education: Project, problems, prospects (pp. 81-96). Budapest, Hungary: OECD and Hungarian Ministry of Education.
- Wittwer, J., & Senkbeil, M. (2008). Is students' computer use at home related to their mathematical performance at school? Computers & Education, 50(4), 1558-1571.
- Ziden, A. A., Ismail, I., Spian, R., & Kumutha, K. (2011). The effects of ICT use in teaching and learning on students' achievement in Science subject in a primary school in Malaysia. Malaysia Journal of Distance Education, 13(2), 19-32.