DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

아스팔트 도로포장 유지보수용 표면처리공법의 공용성 평가

Performance Evaluation of Surface Treatments for Asphalt Pavement Preservation

  • 임정혁 (한국건설기술연구원) ;
  • 김영수 (노스캐롤라이나 주립대학교.토목공학과) ;
  • 백철민 (한국건설기술연구원)
  • 투고 : 2015.03.05
  • 심사 : 2015.04.10
  • 발행 : 2015.04.15

초록

PURPOSES : The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance properties of chip seals and fog seals with polymer-modified emulsions. METHODS : The performance of chip seals and fog seals was evaluated on the basis of common issues in surface treatments. Granite aggregate and four types of asphalt emulsions (one of the unmodified and three of the modified emulsions) were used considering the usage in field. A Vialit test was performed to determine the aggregate retention, and the MMLS3 (Third Scale Model Mobile Load Simulator) test was conducted to determine the aggregate retention, bleeding, and rutting. In addition, the fog seal specimens were tested by the BPT (British Pendulum Test) to evaluate skid resistance. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS : Overall, the polymer-modified emulsions (PMEs) showed better aggregate retention and bleeding resistance for both chip seals and fog seals. When comparing the performance of the PMEs, the difference was not considerable. In addition, PMEs present significantly better rutting resistance than unmodified emulsions. For skid resistance, if the recommended mix design is applied, the specimens do not cause issues with skid resistance. Although all of the fog seal specimens were over the criteria for skid resistance, the specimen fabricated by the high emulsion application rate (EAR) of the unmodified emulsion was nearly equivalent to the skid value criteria. Therefore, the use of an unmodified emulsion with a high EAR should be carefully applied in the field.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chipsealing in New Zealand (2005). Transit New Zealand, Wellington, New Zealand.
  2. Gransberg, D.D. and D.M.B. James (2005). Chip Seal Best Practices. NCHRP Synthesis 342, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C.
  3. Gransberg, D.D. Correlating. (2006). Chip Seal Performance and Construction Methods. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1958, pp. 54-58.
  4. Kim, Y. R. and J. Lee. 2009. Performance-Based Analysis of Polymer-Modified Emulsions in Asphalt Surface Treatments. Final Report, Report No. FHWA/NC/2007-06, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC.
  5. Kim, Y. R. and J. Adams. 2011. Development of a New Chip Seal Mix Design Method. Final Report, Report No. HWY-2008-04, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC.
  6. Kim, Y. R. and J. S. Lee. (2005). Optimizing Gradations for Surface Treatments. Final Report, Report No. FHWA/NC/2005-15, North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC.
  7. Kodippily, S. (2013). Modelling The Flushing Mechanism of Thin Flexible Surface Pavements. Doctoral Thesis, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
  8. Kuennen, T. (2005). Making High Volume Roads Last Longer. Better Roads, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Association. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation/ppc0612.cfm
  9. Lawson, W.D., M. Leaverton, and S. Senadheera (2007). Maintenance Solutions for Bleeding and Flushed Pavements Surfaced with Seal Coat or Surface Treatment. Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office, Report 0-5230-1.
  10. McLeod, N.W. (1969). A General Method of Design for Seal Coat and Surface Treatments. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 38.
  11. NCDOT (North Carolina Department of Transportation). (2012). Pavement Condition Survey Manual 2012.
  12. Takamura, K. (2003). Improved Fatigue Resistance of Asphalt Emulsion Residue Modified with SBR Latex. AEMA Annual Meeting in Nashville, TN.
  13. Wood, T.J. and R.C. Olson (2007). Rebirth of Chip Sealing in Minnesota. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1, No. 1898, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.