DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis on Differences in Muscle Activities Depending on Distance Changes and Success or Failure in Connection with Golf Approach Swings

골프 어프로치 스윙 시 거리변화와 성공·실패에 따른 EMG 차이 분석

  • Lee, Kyung-Ill (Department of Physical Education, College of Physical Education, Chosun University) ;
  • You, Moon-Seok (Department of Physical Education, Graduate School of Chosun University) ;
  • Hong, Wan-Ki (Department of Physical Education, College of Physical Education, Chosun University)
  • 이경일 (조선대학교 체육대학 체육학과) ;
  • 유문석 (조선대학교 대학원 체육학과) ;
  • 홍완기 (조선대학교 체육대학 체육학과)
  • Received : 2015.01.30
  • Accepted : 2015.03.23
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this study was to compare differences in muscle activities according to distance changes, and success or failure in relation to approaches during a round of golf in order to obtain basic data on golf swings. Methods : To achieve our research goal, we asked eight professional golfers playing for the Korea Professional Golfers' Association (height: $1.76{\pm}0.05m$, weight: $73.87{\pm}9.21kg$, career duration: $12.87{\pm}4.48yr$) to perform approach swings at distances of 30, 50, and 70 m. Results : No differences were observed in the muscle activity of the extensor carpi radialis that were caused by the distance changes. In addition, we found that the wrist extensors seemed unaffected by the increase in approach distance. Also, we found that the powers of the approach shots were driven by efficient movements rather than by the strength of the arms. We confirmed that when the distance of the approach increased, the golfers should perform their back-swing tops and follow-through right from the right to the left pelvic limb. To achieve successful approach swings despite distance changes, golfers should first work on the activity of the erector spinae to prepare for rotatory power in the P1 section. Moreover, golfers should increase the activity of the erector spinae on the left when they need to deal with the distance improvements in the P2 and P3 sections. Conclusion : In the light of the discussion above, we may infer that despite approach distance changes during a round of golf, ideal swings can be realized by consistent activities of the wrist extensor muscles and improved performances of the pelvic limb muscles. Furthermore, this study suggests that golfers should improve the consistency of muscle activities in all the other body parts to achieve the ideal swing.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, G. L. (2014). Kinematic and EMG Analysis of Short Putter and Long Putter During Golf Putting. Unpublished Master's thesis, Graduate School of Korea University.
  2. Cho, T. H., Cho, S. W., & Kim, J. S. (2014). A comparative analysis of the muscular strength and power of upper and lower limb in university women golf players on driving distances by driver shot. Korean Journal of Society Golf Studies, 8(1), 19-26.
  3. Cole, M. H., & Grimshaw, P. N.(2008). Electromyography of the trunk and abdomonal muscle in golfer with and wihtout low back pain. Journal of science and Medicine in Spots, 11(2), 174-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2007.02.006
  4. David, L. (1995). Faults and Fixes. Seoul: Sam Ho Media.
  5. Jobe, F. W., Perry, J., & Pink, M.(1989). Electromyographic shouder activity in men and women professional golfers. American Journal Sports Medicine, 17(6), 782-787. https://doi.org/10.1177/036354658901700611
  6. Jung, S. E. (2011). Biomecanical Factor Analysis of Distance Adjustment during the approach Shot within 100Yards between Professional and Amateur Golfers, Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Unpublished Master's thesis, Graduate School of Soonchunhyang University.
  7. Kim, H. M., & Woo, S. Y.(2014). Weight distribution of the supporting foot and muscle activity of the upper extremity according to the target distance in golf pitch shot. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 53(2), 567-578.
  8. Kim, C. W., & Park, J. J. (2001). Analysis of EMG distribution or loading of arm muscle on golf swing. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 11(1), 13-26.
  9. Kim, K. J. (2008). A comparative analysis of IEMG of skilled hands and beginners of golf on the frequent in juring areas from Iron shot. Korean Journal of Exercise Science, 17(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.15857/ksep.2008.17.2.95
  10. Kim, S. Y., Lee, J. S., Yang, J. O., Lee, S. d., Kim, Y. S., Lee, B. J., & Kim, I. H. (2009). Gender differences in electromyography of the lower extremity during golf driver swing. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 19(3), 557-566. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2009.19.3.557
  11. Kim, J. J. (2007). Kinematic Analysis of 20m Approach Motion by Golf Open Stance Angle Changes. Unpublished Master's Thesis dissertation, Graduate School of konkuk University.
  12. McHard, A., & Pollard, H. (2005). Muscle activity during the golf swing. British Journal Sports Medicine, 39(11), 799-804. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2005.020271
  13. Neumann, D. A. (2004). Knesiology of the muscluloskeletal system. Mosby.
  14. Nesbit, S. M., & Serrano, M. (2005). Work and power analysis of the golf swing. Journal of Sport Science and Medicine, 4(4), 520-533.
  15. Park, J. Y., Lee, H., J., Park, B. Y. (2009). The lectromyo-graphy Analysis of Approach swing in Golf. Korean Journal of Sports Medicine, 27(2), 200-205.
  16. Park, J. R., Cho, Y. J., & Park, B. Y.(2004). The analysis of electromyography during golf driver swing. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 43(2), 837-844.
  17. Sim, T. Y., Shin, S. H., Oh, S. I., & Mun, J. H. (2004). EMG analysis for investigation muscle collaborated relationship during golf swing. Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics, 14(3), 177-189. https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2004.14.3.177
  18. Son, J. H. (2011). Analysis of Golf Players' Swing Motion According to Adjustment of Power, Distance and Trajectory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Graduate School of Kookmin University.
  19. Won, H. J. (2002). Davepelz's short game bible. Seoul; HakWonSa.

Cited by

  1. Analysis of Biomechanical Differences based on Distance Changes in Connection with Approach Swings of Tour-professional Golfers vol.26, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2016.26.1.83