DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Genomic Regions associated with Necrotic Enteritis Resistance in Fayoumi and White Leghorn Chickens

  • Kim, Eui-Soo (Department of Animal Science, Iowa State University) ;
  • Lillehoj, Hyun S. (Animal Biosciences and Biotechnology Laboratory, Agricultural Research Services, United States Department of Agriculture Beltsville) ;
  • Sohn, Sea Hwan (Department of Animal Science and Biotechnology, Jinju National University) ;
  • Hong, Yeong Ho (Department of Animal Science and Technology, Chung-Ang University)
  • Received : 2014.12.23
  • Accepted : 2015.02.16
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

In this study, we used two breeds of chicken to identify genomic regions corresponding to necrotic enteritis (NE) resistance. We scanned the genomes of a resistant and susceptible line of Fayoumi and White Leghorn chickens (20 birds/line) using a chicken 60 K Illumina SNP panel. A total of 235 loci with divergently fixed alleles were identified across the genome in both breeds; particularly, several clusters of multiple loci with fixed alleles were found in five narrow regions. Moreover, consensus 15-SNP haplotypes that were shared by the resistant lines of both breeds were identified on chromosomes 3, 7 and 9. Genes responsible for NE resistance were identified in chicken lines selected for resistance and susceptibility. Annotation of the regions spanning clustered divergently fixed regions revealed a set of interesting candidate genes such as phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 5, p101 (PIK3R5) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor 1 (ITPR1), which participate in immune response. Consensus haplotypes were found in regions containing possibly relevant genes, such as myostatin and myosin, which play important roles in muscle development. Thus, genome scans of divergent selection in multiple chicken lines and breeds can be used to identify genomic regions associated with NE resistance.

Keywords

References

  1. Bacon LD, Hunt HD, Cheng HH 2000 A review of development of chicken lines to resolve genes determining resistance to disease. Poultry Sci 79:1082-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/79.8.1082
  2. Chen EY, Tan CM, Kou Y, Duan Q, Wang Z, Meirelles GV, Clark NR, Ma'ayan A 2013 Enrichr: Interactive and collaborative HTML5 gene list enrichment analysis tool. BMC Bioinformatics 14:128. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-128
  3. Elferink MG, Megens HJ, Vereijken A, Hu X, Croojimans RP, Groenen MA 2012 Signatures of selection in the genomes of commercial and non-commercial chicken breeds. Plos One 7:e32720. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032720
  4. Fisher RA 1954 A fuller theory of 'Junctions' in inbreeding. Heredity 8:187-97. https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.1954.17
  5. Groenen MA, Megens HJ, Zare Y, Warren WC, Hillier LW, Crooijmans RP, Vereijken A, Okimoto R, Muir WM, Cheng HH 2011 The development and characterization of a 60K SNP chip for chicken. BMC Genomics 12(1):274. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-12-274
  6. Hong YH, Dinh H, Lillehoj HS, Song KD, Oh JD 2014 Differential regulation of microRNA transcriptome in chicken lines resistant and susceptible to necrotic enteritis disease. Poult Sci 93:1383-95. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2013-03666
  7. Jang SI, Lillehoj HS, Lee SH, Lee KW, Lillehoj EP, Hong YH, An DJ, Jeong W, Chun JE, Bertrand F, Dupuis L, Deville S, Arous JB 2012 Vaccination with clostridium perfringens recombinant proteins in combination with montanide ISA 71 VG adjuvant increases protection against experimental necrotic enteritis in commercial broiler chickens. Vaccine 30:5401-5406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.007
  8. Kim DK, Kim CH, Lamont SJ, Keeler Jr CL, Lillehoj HS 2009 Gene expression profiles of two B-complex disparate, genetically inbred Fayoumi chicken lines that differ in susceptibility to Eimeria maxima. Poultry Sci 88:1565-79. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00012
  9. Kranis A, Gheyas AA, Boschiero C, Turner F, Yu L, Smith S, Talbot R, Pirani A, Brew F, Kaiser P, Hocking PM, Fife M, Salmon N, Fulton J, Strom TM, Haberer G, Weigend S, Preisinger R, Gholami M, Qanbari S, Simianer H, Watson KA, Woolliams JA, Burt DW 2013 Development of a high density 600K SNP genotyping array for chicken. BMC Genomics 14:59. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-59
  10. Park SS, Lillehoj HS, Allen PC, Park DW, FitzCoy S, Bautista DA, Lillehoj EP 2008 Immunopathology and cytokine responses in broiler chickens coinfected with Eimeria maxima and Clostridium perfringens with the use of an animal model of necrotic enteritis. Avian Dis 52:14-22. https://doi.org/10.1637/7997-041707-Reg
  11. Rubin C-J, Zody M, Eriksson J, Meadows JR, Sherwood E, Webster MT, Jiang L, Ingman M, Sharpe T, Ka S, Hallbook F, Besnier F, Carlborg O, Bed'hom B, Tixier-Boichard M, Jensen P, Siegel P, Lindblad-Toh K, Andersson L 2010 Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature 464:587-591. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08832
  12. Smith JA, Helm JD 2008 Report of the committee on transmissible diseases of poultry and other avian species. http://www.usaha.org/Portals/6/Reports/2010/report-pad-2010.pdf
  13. Williams RB 2005 Intercurrent coccidiosis and necrotic enteritis of chickens: Rational, integrated disease management by maintenance of gut integrity. Avian Pathol 34:159-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/03079450500112195
  14. Zhou H, Lamont SJ 1999 Genetic characterization of biodiversity in highly inbred chicken lines by microsatellite markers. Anim Genet 30: 256-264. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2052.1999.00505.x
  15. Zhou H, Lamont SJ 2003 Chicken MHC class I and II gene effects on antibody response kinetics in adult chickens. Immunogenetics 5:133-140.
  16. Zhang H, Hu X, Wang Z, Zhang Y, Wang S, Wang N, Ma L, Leng L, Wang S, Wang Q, Wang Y, Tang Z, Li N, Da Y, Li H 2012 Selection signature analysis implicates the PC1/PCSK1 region for chicken abdominal fat content. Plos One 7:e40736. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040736

Cited by

  1. Genetics and genomics of susceptibility and immune response to necrotic enteritis in chicken: a review vol.45, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-017-4138-8