DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Particulate Emissions from Biodiesel using High Resolution Time of Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer

  • Choi, Yongjoo (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Choi, Jinsoo (Climate & Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Park, Taehyun (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Kang, Seokwon (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Lee, Taehyoung (Department of Environmental Science, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • Received : 2015.02.13
  • Accepted : 2015.02.24
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

In the past several decades, biofuels have emerged as candidates to help mitigate the issues of global warming, fossil fuel depletion and, in some cases, atmospheric pollution. To date, the only biofuels that have achieved any significant penetration in the global transportation sector are ethanol and biodiesel. The global consumption of biodiesel was rapidly increased from 2005. The goal of this study was to examine the chemical composition on particulate pollutant emissions from a diesel engine operating on several different biodiesels. Tests were performed on non-road diesel engine. Experiments were performed on 5 different fuel blends at 2 different engine loading conditions (50% and 75%). 5 different fuel blends were ultra-low sulfur diesel (ULSD, 100%), soy biodiesel (Blend 20% and Blend 100%) and canola biodiesel (Blend 20% and Blend 100%). The chemical properties of particulate pollutants were characterized using an Aerodyne High Resolution Time of Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS). Organic matter and nitrate were generally the most abundant aerosol components and exhibited maximum concentration of $1207{\mu}g/m^3$ and $30{\mu}g/m^3$, respectively. On average, the oxidized fragment families ($C_xH_yO_1{^+}$, and $C_xH_yO_z{^+}$) account for ~13% of the three family sum, while ~87% comes from the $C_xH_y{^+}$ family. The two peaks of $C_2H_3O_2$ (m/z 59.01) and $C_3H_7O$ (m/z 59.04) located at approximately m/z 59 could be used to identify atmospheric particulate matter directly to biodiesel exhaust, as distinguished from that created by petroleum diesel in the AMS data.

Keywords

References

  1. Aakko, P., Nylund, N.O., Westerholm, M., Marjamaki, M., Moisio, M., Hillamo, R. (2002) Emissions from heavy-duty engine with and without aftertreatment using selected biofuels. In: FISITA 2002 world automotive congress proceedings, F02E195.
  2. Appenzeller, T. (2004) The End of Cheap Oil. National Geographic, June 2004.
  3. Bagley, S.T., Gratz, L.D., Johnson, J.H., McDonald, J.F. (1998) Effects of an Oxidation Catalytic Converter and a Biodiesel Fuel on the Chemical, Mutagenic, and Particle Size Characteristics of Emissions from a Diesel Engine. Environmental Science & Technology 32, 1183-1191. https://doi.org/10.1021/es970224q
  4. Bennett, M., Volckens, J., Stanglmaier, R., McNichol, A.P., Ellenson, W.D., Lewis, C.W. (2008) Biodiesel effects on particulate radiocarbon (14C) emissions from a diesel engine. Journal of Aerosol Science 39, 667-678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.04.001
  5. Chapman, L. (2007) Transport and climate change: a review. Journal of Transport Geography 15, 354-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.008
  6. Chirico, R., Clairotte, M., Adam, T.W., Giechaskiel, B., Heringa, M.F., Elsasser, M., Martini, G., Manfredi, U., Streibel, T., Sklorz, M., Zimmermann, R., DeCarlo, P.F., Astorga, C., Baltensperger, U., Prevot, A.S.H. (2014) Emissions of organic aerosol mass, black carbon, particle number, and regulated and unregulated gases from scooters and light and heavy duty vehicles with different fuels. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussion 14, 16591-16639. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-16591-2014
  7. DeCarlo, P.F., Kimmel, J.R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M.J., Jayne, J.T., Aiken, A.C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., Docherty, K.S., Worsnop, D.R., Jimenez, J.L. (2006) Field-Deployable, High-Resolution, Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Analytical Chemistry 78, 8281-8289. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac061249n
  8. De Filippo, A., Maricq, M.M. (2008) Diesel nucleation mode particles: semivolatile or solid? Environmental Science and Technology 42, 7957-7962. https://doi.org/10.1021/es8010332
  9. Demirbas, A. (2007) Importance of biodiesel as transportation fuel. Energy Policy 35, 4661-4670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.04.003
  10. Di, Y., Cheung, C.S., Huang, Z. (2009) Comparison of the effect of biodiesel-diesel and ethanoldiesel on the particulate emissions of a direct injection diesel engine. Aerosol Sciecnce & Technology 43, 455-465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820902718078
  11. Drewnick, F., Hings, S.S., DeCarlo, P., Jayne, J.T., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Weimer, S., Jimenez, J.L., Demerjian, K.L., Borrmann, S., Worsnop, D.R. (2005) A New Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (TOF-AMS) - Instrument Description and First Field Deployment. Aerosol Science and Technology 39, 637-658. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182040
  12. Dutcher, D.D., Pagels, J., Bika, A., Franklin, L., Stolzenburg, M., Thompson, S., Medrano, J., Brown, N., Gross, D.S., Kittelson, D., McMurry, P.H. (2011) Emissions from soy biodiesel blends: A single particle perspective. Atmospheric Environment 45, 3406-3413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.03.047
  13. Gaffney, J.S., Marley, N.A. (2009) The impacts of combustion emissions on air quality and climate - From coal to biofuels and beyond. Atmospheric Environment 43, 23-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.016
  14. Gordon, T.D., Presto, A.A., Nguyen, N.T., Robertson, W.H., Na, K., Sahay, K.N., Zhang, M., Maddox, C., Rieger, P., Chattopadhyay, S., Maldonado, H., Maricq, M.M., Robinson, A.L. (2014) Secondary organic aerosol production from diesel vehicle exhaust: impact of aftertreatment, fuel chemistry and driving cycle. Atmospheic Chemistry and Physics 14, 4643-4659. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4643-2014
  15. Heikkila, J., Virtanen, A., Ronkko, T., Keskinen, J., Aakko-Saksa, P., Murtonen, T. (2009) Nanoparticle emissions from a heavy-duty engine running on alternative diesel fuels. Environmental Science & Technology 43, 9501-9506. https://doi.org/10.1021/es9013807
  16. Jayne, J.T., Leard, D.C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K.A., Kolb, C.E., Worsnop, D.R. (2000) Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles. Aerosol Science and Technology 33, 49-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840
  17. Jimenez, J.L., Jayne, J.T., Shi, Q., Kolb, C.E., Worsnop, D.R., Yourshaw, I., Seinfeld, J.H., Flagan, R.C., Zhang, X., Smith, K.A., Morris, J.W., Davidovits, P. (2003) Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 108, 8425. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001213
  18. Karavalakis, G., Stournas, S., Fontaras, G., Samaras, Z., Dedes, G., Bakeas, E. (2009) The Effect of Biodiesel on PAHs, Nitro-PAHs and Oxy-PAHs Emissions from a Light Vehicle Operated Over the European and the Artemis Driving Cycles. SAE Technical Paper 2009-01-1895.
  19. Kittelson, D.B. (1998) Engines and nanoparticles: a review. Journal of Aerosol Science 29, 575-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(97)10037-4
  20. Kittelson, D.B., Watts, W.F., Johnson, J.P. (2006) On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosols part 1: summary of diesel engine results. Journal of Aerosol Science 37, 913-930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.08.005
  21. Lapuerta, M., Armas, O., Rodriguez-Fernandez, J. (2008) Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 34, 198-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2007.07.001
  22. Lee, T., Sullivan, A.P., Mack, L., Jimenez, J.L., Kreidenweis, S.M., Onasch, T.B., Worsnop, D.R., Malm, W., Wold, C.E., Hao, W.M., Collett, J.L. (2010) Chemical Smoke Marker Emissions During Flaming and Smoldering Phases of Laboratory Open Burning of Wildland Fuels. Aerosol Science & Technology 44, i-v.
  23. Mayer, A., Czerwinski, J., Wyser, M., Mattrel, P., Heitzer, A. (2005) Impact of RME/Diesel Blends 5 on Particle Formation, Particle Filtration and PAH Emissions. SAE Technical Paper 2005-01-1728, doi:10.4271/2005-01-1728.
  24. Middlebrook, A.M., Bahreini, R., Jimenez, J.L., Canagaratna, M.R. (2011) Evaluation of Composition-Dependent Collection Efficiencies for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer using Field Data. Aerosol Science & Technology 46, 258-271.
  25. National Biodiesel Board (2009) U.S. Biodiesel Production Capacity. U.S. Biodiesel Board.
  26. Sheehan, J., Camobreco, V., Duffield, J., Graboski, M., Shapouri, H. (1998) An Overview of Biodiesel and Petroleum Diesel Life Cycles. NREL/TP-580-24772, NREL.
  27. U.S. Department of Energy (2009) National Algal Biofuels Technology Roadmap. DOE Biomass Program, September 2014.
  28. USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) A Comprehensive Analysis of Biodiesel Impacts on Exhaust Emissions. EPA 420-P-02-001, October, 2014.
  29. Young, L.-H., Liou, Y.-J., Cheng, M.-T., Lu, J.-H., Yang, H.-H., Tsai, Y.I., Wang, L.-C., Chen, C.-B., and Lai, J.-S. (2012) Effects of biodiesel, engine load and diesel particulate filter on nonvolatile particle number size distributions in heavy-duty diesel engine exhaust. Journal of Hazardous Materials 199-200, 282-289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.11.014
  30. Zhu, L., Cheung, C.S., Zhang, W.G., Huang, Z. (2010) Influence of methanol-biodiesel blends on the particulate emissions of a direct injection diesel engine. Aerosol Science & Technology 44, 362-369. https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003652646