DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Alternative Method of Retrocrural Approach during Celiac Plexus Block Using a Bent Tip Needle

  • An, Ji Won (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Eun Kyeong (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Chol Hee (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Jong Bum (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ko, Dong-Kyun (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Youn-Woo (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesia and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.14
  • 심사 : 2015.01.28
  • 발행 : 2015.04.01

초록

Background: This study sought to determine safe ranges of oblique angle, skin entry point and needle length by reviewing computed tomography (CT) scans and to evaluate the usefulness of a bent tip needle during celiac plexus block (CPB). Methods: CT scans of 60 CPB patients were reviewed. Image of the uppermost margin of L2 vertebral body was used to measure the minimal and maximal oblique angles and the distances from the midline to skin puncture point. The imaginary needle trajectory distance was calculated by three-dimensional measurement. When the procedure was performed by using a $10^{\circ}$ bent tip needle under a $20^{\circ}$ oblique X-ray fluoroscopic view, the distance (GF/G'F) from the midline to the actual puncture site was measured. Results: The imaginary safe oblique angle range was $26.4-34.2^{\circ}$ and $27.7-36.0^{\circ}$ on the right and left, respectively. The distance from the midline to skin puncture point was 6.1-7.6 cm on the right and 6.3-7.6 cm on the left. The needle trajectory distance at minimal angle was 9.6-11.6 cm on the right and 9.5-11.5 cm on the left. The distance of GF/G'F was 5.1-6.5 cm and 5.0-6.4 cm on the right and left, respectively. All imaginary parameters were correlated with BMI except for GF/G'F. All complications were mild and transient. Conclusions: We identified safe values of angles and distances using a straight needle. Furthermore, using a bent tip needle under a $20^{\circ}$ oblique fluoroscopic view, we could safely perform CPB with smaller parameter values.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Bahn BM, Erdek MA. Celiac plexus block and neurolysis for pancreatic cancer. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2013; 17: 310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-012-0310-y
  2. de Oliveira R, dos Reis MP, Prado WA. The effects of early or late neurolytic sympathetic plexus block on the management of abdominal or pelvic cancer pain. Pain 2004; 110: 400-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2004.04.023
  3. Waldman SD, Patt RB. Splanchnic and celiac plexus nerve block. In: Pain management. Edited by Waldman SD. Philadelphia (PA), Saunders-Elsevier. 2006, pp 1268-70.
  4. Wang PJ, Shang MY, Qian Z, Shao CW, Wang JH, Zhao XH. CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block technique. Abdom Imaging 2006; 31: 710-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-006-9153-5
  5. Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, Ciaccia D, Ikenberry S, Lehman G. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience. Am J Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 409-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2001.03551.x
  6. Ward EM, Rorie DK, Nauss LA, Bahn RC. The celiac ganglia in man: normal anatomic variations. Anesth Analg 1979; 58: 461-5.
  7. Hur CR, Yoon DM, Oh HK, Chung MS, Chung IH. Morphological variations of the celiac plexus in Korean cadavers. J Korean Pain Soc 1989; 2: 135-44.
  8. De Cicco M, Matovic M, Bortolussi R, Coran F, Fantin D, Fabiani F, et al. Celiac plexus block: injectate spread and pain relief in patients with regional anatomic distortions. Anesthesiology 2001; 94: 561-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200104000-00006
  9. Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 1605-17. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0901557
  10. Eisenberg E, Carr DB, Chalmers TC. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 1995; 80: 290-5.
  11. Ischia S, Ischia A, Polati E, Finco G. Three posterior percutaneous celiac plexus block techniques. A prospective, randomized study in 61 patients with pancreatic cancer pain. Anesthesiology 1992; 76: 534-40. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199204000-00008
  12. Navarro-Martinez J, Montes A, Comps O, Sitges-Serra A. Retroperitoneal abscess after neurolytic celiac plexus block from the anterior approach. Reg Anesth Pain Med 2003; 28: 528-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00115550-200311000-00009
  13. Ina H, Kitoh T, Kobayashi M, Imai S, Ofusa Y, Goto H. New technique for the neurolytic celiac plexus block: the transintervertebral disc approach. Anesthesiology 1996; 85: 212-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199607000-00028
  14. Singler RC. An improved technique for alcohol neurolysis of the celiac plexus. Anesthesiology 1982; 56: 137-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-198202000-00008
  15. Ischia S, Luzzani A, Ischia A, Faggion S. A new approach to the neurolytic block of the coeliac plexus: the transaortic technique. Pain 1983; 16: 333-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(83)90148-3
  16. Romanelli DF, Beckmann CF, Heiss FW. Celiac plexus block: efficacy and safety of the anterior approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160: 497-500. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.160.3.8430543
  17. Lee JK, Rhee JY, Chung JG, Rhee CS. CT - guided celiac plexus block using anterior approach. J Korean Pain Soc 1999; 12: 87-94.
  18. Rana MV, Candido KD, Raja O, Knezevic NN. Celiac plexus block in the management of chronic abdominal pain. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2014; 18: 394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-013-0394-z
  19. Oh HK. Celiac plexus block: a review. J Korean Pain Soc 1990; 3: 1-3.
  20. Ochiai Y, Ishii S, Takahashi S, Mizobuchi S, Fukushima T, Katayama H, et al. Appropriate puncture site for CT monitored celiac plexus block determined from CT films. Masui 1992; 41: 1961-5.
  21. Weber JG, Brown DL, Stephens DH, Wong GY. Celiac plexus block. Retrocrural computed tomographic anatomy in patients with and without pancreatic cancer. Reg Anesth 1996; 21: 407-13.

피인용 문헌

  1. A case report vol.95, pp.27, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000004106