DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of the aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic performance of a high-lift reentry vehicle

  • Pezzella, Giuseppe (Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Aerothermodynamics Section, Italian Aerospace Research Centre)
  • 투고 : 2013.07.18
  • 심사 : 2014.09.02
  • 발행 : 2015.04.25

초록

This paper deals with the aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic trade-off analysis of a hypersonic flying test bed. Such vehicle will have to be launched with an expendable launcher and shall re-enter the Earth atmosphere allowing to perform several experiments on critical re-entry phenomena. The demonstrator under study is a re-entry space glider characterized by a relatively simple vehicle architecture able to validate hypersonic aerothermodynamic design database and passenger experiments, including thermal shield and hot structures. A summary review of the aerodynamic characteristics of two flying test bed concepts, compliant with a phase-A design level, has been provided hereinafter. Several design results, based both on engineering approach and computational fluid dynamics, are reported and discussed in the paper.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Anderson, J.D. (1989), Hypersonic and High Temperature Gas Dynamics, McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.
  2. Brauckmann, G.J. (1999), "X-34 vehicle aerodynamic characteristics", J. Spacecraf. Rock., 36(2), 229-239. https://doi.org/10.2514/2.3453
  3. De Matteis, P.P. and Russo, G. (2006), "The USV_X concept: mastering key-elements for future reentry systems", Proceedings of 1st International ARA Days-Atmospheric Reentry Systems, Missions and Vehicles, Arcachon, France.
  4. Guidotti, G., Pezzella, G., Richiello, C., Russo, G., Tirtey, S.C. and Boyce, R.R. (2011), "Preliminary analysis of the USV_2 hypersonic flight test", Proceedings of 7th European Symposium on Aerothermodynamics, Brugge, Belgium.
  5. Maughmer, M., Ozoroski, L., Straussfogel, D. and Long, L. (1993), "Validation of engineering methods for predicting hypersonic vehicle control forces and moments", J. Guid Control Dyn., 16 (4), 762-769. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.21078
  6. Moore, M.E. and Williams, J.E. (1989), "Aerodynamic prediction rationale for analyses of hypersonic configurations", Proceedings of 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA 89-0525.
  7. Pezzella, G. (2011), "Aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic trade-off analysis of a small hypersonic flying test bed", Acta Astronautica, 69(3), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.03.004
  8. Pezzella, G., Gardi, R., Guidotti, G. and Richiello, C. (2011), "Aerodynamic and aerothermodynamic trade-off analysis of the italian USV2 flying test bed in the framework of an hypersonic flight test", Proceedings of 3nd International ARA Days, Arcachon, France, May.
  9. Pezzella, G., Marini, M., Roncioni, P., Kauffmann, J. and Tomatis, C. (2009), "Preliminary design of vertical takeoff hopper concept of future launchers preparatory program", J. Spacecraf. Rock., 46(4), 788-799. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.39193
  10. Prabhu, D.K. (2004), "System design constraints-trajectory aerothermal environments", RTO AVT/VKI Lecture Series in Critical Technologies for Hypersonic Vehicle Development, May.
  11. Quinn, R.D. and Gong, L. (1990), "Real-time aerodynamic heating and surface temperature calculations for hypersonic flight simulation", NASA Technical Memorandum, 4222.
  12. Russo, G. (2011), "USV status 2011: new steps ahead", Proceedings of 17th AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, San Francisco, April.
  13. Russo, G (2011), "USV programme progress and perspectives", Proceedings of 3rd International ARA Days, Arcachon, France, May.
  14. Roncioni, P., Rufolo, G.C., Marini, M. and Borrelli, S. (2009), "CFD rebuilding of USV-DTFT1 vehicle in-flight experiment", Acta Astronautica, 66(7), 1201-1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2009.10.015
  15. Viviani, A. and Pezzella, G. (2010), "Computational flowfield analysis over a Blunt-Body reentry vehicle", J. Spacecraf. Rock., 47(2), 258-270. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.40876