DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Therapeutic Efficacy of Low Frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Conjunction with Mirror Therapy for Sub-acute Stroke Patients

  • Cha, Hyun Gyu (Department of Physical Therapy, Eulji University Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Myoung-Kwon (Department of Physical Therapy, Daegu University)
  • 투고 : 2015.02.26
  • 심사 : 2015.03.11
  • 발행 : 2015.03.31

초록

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in conjunction with mirror therapy on the balance function of patients with sub-acute stroke hemiparesis. This study was conducted with 36 subjects who were diagnosed with a hemiparesis due to stroke. Participants in the experimental (19 members) and control groups (17 members) received rTMS and sham rTMS during 10 minute sessions each, which were carried out five days per week for four weeks. This was followed by the mirror therapy over 30 minute sessions, which were carried out five days per week for four weeks. Motor recovery was assessed by balance index, dynamic limits of stability, Berg balance scale, and time up go test. The change values of the balance index ($-2.06{\pm}1.99$ versus $-0.41{\pm}1.11$), dynamic limits of stability ($3.68{\pm}2.71$ versus $1.17{\pm}2.38$), and time up go test ($-7.05{\pm}5.64$ score versus $-3.35{\pm}5.30$ score) were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). At post-test, balance index ($4.08{\pm}1.14$ versus $5.09{\pm}1.04$), dynamic limits of stability ($13.75{\pm}0.60$ versus $11.73{\pm}3.53$), and time up go test ($23.89{\pm}4.51$ versus $28.82{\pm}3.07$) were significantly higher in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). In the experimental group, significant differences were found in the pre- and post-test scores for the balance index, dynamic limits of stability, Berg balance scale, and time up go test (p < 0.01). In the control group, a significant difference was observed between the pre- and post-test only for the Berg balance scale and time up go test (p < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that the application of 1Hz rTMS in conjunction with mirror therapy can be helpful in improving the balance function of patients with sub-acute stroke hemiparesis, and this may be used as a practical adjunct to routine rehabilitation therapy.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. L. Nyberg and Y. Gustafson, Stroke. 26, 838 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.26.5.838
  2. J. A. Grisso, J. L. Kelsey, B. L. Strom, G. Y. Chiu, G. Maislin, L. A. O'Brien, S. Hoffman, and F. Kaplan, N. Engl. J. Med. 324, 1326 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199105093241905
  3. I. V. Bonan, F. M. Colle, J. P. Guichard, E. Vicaut, M. Eisenfisz, P. Tran Ba Huy, and A. P. Yelnik, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 268 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2003.06.017
  4. S. F. Tyson and A. B. Selley, Disabil Rehabil. 29, 395 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280600841158
  5. J. Vaillant, N. Vuillerme, A. Janvy, F. Louis, R. Juvin, and V. Nouqier, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 85, 1962 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.019
  6. J. A. Katula and E. McAuley, The mirror does not lie: Acute exercise and self-efficacy. Int. J. Behav. Med. 8, 319 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327558ijbm0804_6
  7. J. A. Stevens and M. E. Stoykov, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 84, 1090 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00042-X
  8. V. M. Pomeroy, C. A. Clark, J. S. Miller, J. C. Baron, H. S. Markus, and R. C. Tallis, Neurorehabil Nerual Repair. 19, 4 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968304274351
  9. V. S. Ramachandran, W. Hirstein, Brain. 121, 1603 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.9.1603
  10. S. Sutbeyaz, G. Yavuzer, N. Sezer, and B. F. Koseoqlu, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 88, 555 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.02.034
  11. G. Yavuzer, R. Selles, N. Sezer, S. Sutbeyaz, J. B. Bussmann, F. Koseoqlu, M. B. Atay, and H. J. Stam, Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 89, 393 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.08.162
  12. W. J. Levy, V. E. Amassian, U. D. Schmid, and C. Jungreis, Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. Suppl. 43, 51 (1991).
  13. A. Pascual-Leone, J. M. Tormos, J. Keenan, F. Tarazona, C. Canete, and M. D. Catala, J. Clin. Neurophysiol. 15, 333 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1097/00004691-199807000-00005
  14. M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, J. Psychiatr. Res. 12, 189 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  15. A. Srivastava, A. B. Taly, A. Gupta, S. Kumar, and T. Murali, J. Neurol. Sci. 287, 89 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2009.08.051
  16. K. Berg, S. Wood-Dauphinee, and J. I. Williams, Scand J. Rehabil. Med. 27, 27 (1995).
  17. D. Podsiadlo and S. Richardson, J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 39, 142 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.1991.tb01616.x
  18. A. Shumway-Cook and M. H. Woollacott, Williams & Wilkins (1995).
  19. B. H. Dobkin, Neurology. 66, 584 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000198502.88147.dd
  20. J. Lipert, C. Dettmers, C. Terborg, and C. Weiller, Clin. Neurophysiol. 112, 114 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(00)00503-4