DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The final stop consonant perception in typically developing children aged 4 to 6 years and adults

4-6세 정상발달아동 및 성인의 종성파열음 지각력 비교

  • 변경은 (한림대 보건과학대학원 언어병리학과) ;
  • 하승희 (한림대학교 언어청각학부 청각언어연구소)
  • Received : 2015.01.31
  • Accepted : 2015.03.05
  • Published : 2015.03.31

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the development pattern of final stop consonant perception using the gating task. Sixty-four subjects participated in the study: 16 children aged 4 years, 16 children aged 5 years, 17 children aged 6 years, and 15 adults. One-syllable words with consonant-vowel-consonant(CVC) structure, mokㄱ-motㄱ and papㄱ-patㄱ were used as stimuli in order to remove the redundancy of acoustic cues in stimulus words, 40ms-length (-40ms) and 60ms-length (-60ms) from the entire duration of the final consonant were deleted. Three conditions (the whole word segment, -40ms, -60ms) were used for this speech perception experiment. 48 tokens (4 stimuli ${\times}3$ conditions ${\times}4$ trials) in total were provided for participants. The results indicated that 5 and 6 year olds showed final consonant perception similar to adults in stimuli, papㄱ-patㄱ and only the 6-year-old children showed perception similar to adults in stimuli, 'mokㄱ-motㄱ. The results suggested that younger typically developing children require more acoustic information to accurately perceive final consonants than older children and adults. Final consonant perception ability may become adult-like around 6 years old. The study provides fundamental data on the development pattern of speech perception in normal developing children, which can be used to compare to those of children with communication disorders.

Keywords

References

  1. Aylett, M., & Turk, A. (2004). The smooth signal redundancy hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1), 31-56. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309040470010201
  2. Bazzanella, C. (2011). Redundancy, repetition, and intensity in discourse. Language Sciences, 33(2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002
  3. Carter, N. R. (2011). The effect of acoustic cue redundancy on the perception of stop consonants by older and younger adults.
  4. Chiari, I. (2007). Redundancy elimination: The case of artificial languages. Journal of Universal Language, 8(2), 7-38. https://doi.org/10.22425/jul.2007.8.2.7
  5. Edwards, J., Fox, R. A., & Rogers, C. L. (2002). Final Consonant Discrimination in Children Effects of Phonological Disorder, Vocabulary Size, and Articulatory Accuracy. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45(2), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2002/018)
  6. Elliott, L. L., Hammer, M. A., & Evan, K. E. (1987). Perception of gated, highly familiar spoken monosyllabic nouns by children, teenagers, and older adults. Perception & Psychophysics, 42(2), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210503
  7. Grosjean, F. (1980). Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 28(4), 267-283. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204386
  8. Grosjean, F. (1996). Gating. Language and cognitive processes, 11(6), 597-604. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696386999
  9. Kim, D(2006). Workbook of Speech Therapy. Vol 2 Clinical Speech therapy of articulation phonological disorders. Seoul. Paradise. (김두라(2006). 재미있는 언어치료. Vol 2 조음음운장애 언어치료의 실제. 서울. 파라다이스 복지재단)
  10. Kim, H., Kim, M., Jin, Y., & Pae., S(2013) Korean words card for promoting language development. Seoul. Hakjisa (김효진.김미배.진연선.배소영(2013). 언어발달 촉진을 위한 우리말 카드. 서울. 학지사)
  11. Kim, M., Pae, S., & Park, Ch(2007). Assessment of Phonology for Children(APAC). Incheon : Hube R & C. (김민정.배소영.박창일(2007). 아동용발음평가(APAC). 인천:휴브알앤씨.)
  12. Kim, Y., Hong, G., Kim K., Jang, H., & Lee, J(2009). The Receptive and Expressive Vocabulary Test(REVT). Seoul: Seoul community rehabilitation center (김영태.홍경훈.김경희.장혜성.이주연(2009). 수용․표현 어휘력 검사(REVT). 서울: 서울장애인종합복지관.)
  13. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user's guide. Psychology press.
  14. Macmillan, N. A., & Kaplan, H. L. (1985). Detection theory analysis of group data: estimating sensitivity from average hit and false-alarm rates. Psychological bulletin, 98(1), 185. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.1.185
  15. Mayo, C., & Turk, A. (2005). The influence of spectral distinctiveness on acoustic cue weighting in children's and adults' speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(3), 1730-1741. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1979451
  16. Munson, B. (2001). Relationships between vocabulary size and spoken word recognition in children aged 3 to 7. Contemporary Issues in Communication Science and Disorders, 28(20-29).
  17. Nittrouer, S., & Miller, M. E. (1997). Predicting developmental shifts in perceptual weighting schemes. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 101(4), 2253-2266. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.418207
  18. Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers, 31(1), 137-149. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03207704
  19. Sussman, J. E. (2001). Vowel perception by adults and children with normal language and specific language impairment: Based on steady states or transitions?. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109(3), 1173-1180. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1349428

Cited by

  1. The Relationship among Speech Perception, Vocabulary Size and Articulation Accuracy in Children with Speech Sound Disorders vol.21, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.16288
  2. Final Stop Consonant Perception in Children with Speech Sound Disorders vol.20, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12963/csd.15242