Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research (임상간호연구)
- Volume 21 Issue 2
- /
- Pages.154-168
- /
- 2015
- /
- 1598-9186(pISSN)
- /
- 2287-3694(eISSN)
DOI QR Code
Development of Oral Care Nursing Practice Guideline using the Guideline Adaptation Process
간호분야 실무지침의 수용개작 방법론에 따른 구강간호 실무지침의 개발
- Cho, Yong Ae (Red Cross College of Nursing, Chung-Ang University) ;
-
Eun, Young
(College of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
- Gu, Mee Ock (College of Nursing, Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University) ;
- Kim, Kyung Sook (Division of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center) ;
- Kwak, Mi Kyong (Division of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center) ;
- Kim, Jeong Hye (Department of Clinical Nursing, University of Ulsan) ;
- Lee, Seon Heui (College of Nursing, Gacheon University) ;
- Park, Dong-Ah (National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency) ;
- Noh, Hwakyung (Medical Intensive Care Unit, Seoul National University Hospital)
- 조용애 (중앙대학교 적십자간호대학) ;
-
은영
(경상대학교 간호대학) ;
- 구미옥 (경상대학교 간호대학) ;
- 김경숙 (삼성서울병원 간호팀) ;
- 곽미경 (삼성서울병원) ;
- 김정혜 (울산대학교 임상전문간호학) ;
- 이선희 (가천대학교 간호대학) ;
- 박동아 (한국보건의료연구원) ;
- 노화경 (서울대학교 내과계중환자실)
- Received : 2015.05.27
- Accepted : 2015.06.26
- Published : 2015.08.31
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to adapt the previously developed, high-quality oral care guideline for the usage in clinical settings in Korea. Methods: Guideline adaptation process was undertaken according to the guideline adaptation manual version 2.0 developed by National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency (Kim, et al., 2011) and the standardized methodology for nursing practice guideline adaptation (Gu, et al. 2012). Results: The adapted oral care guideline was consisted of 10 domains and 85 recommendations. The number of recommendations in each domain were: 4 general issues, 2 oral care indications, 10 oral assessment 16 general oral care, 15 oral care for critically ill, 15 oral care for cancer patients, 14 oral care for cancer patients withoral complications, 5 oral careeducation, 2 oral care referral, and 2 documentation and report. Ten point six percent of the recommendations were rated as grade A, 20.0% as grade B grade, and more than half (69.4%) were rated as grade C. Conclusion: The adapted oral care practice guideline is expected to included the evidence-based practice guidelines as fundamentalss of nursing practice. Dissemination of the developed guideline nationwide would contribute improving the efficiency of oral care practice.