Next Generation Dairy Processing Science and Technology: Functional and Rational in Dairy Industry

  • Received : 2015.09.02
  • Accepted : 2015.09.17
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

The dairy industry, as part of the broader agricultural sector, is classified as a basic industry to the Korea economy. Basic industries provide income to a region by producing an output, purchasing production inputs, services and labor. An integrated, multidisciplinary approach for the next generation of dairy products with added health benefits represent the direct economic contribution. The commercialization of "nutritional" functional foods can only be successful if the consumer is confident in the scientific validity of the claims. Modern biotechnologies such as genomics, genetic expression and biomarkers of health performance suggested to whole dairy products, such as fluid milk, butter, cheese, ice cream and frozen dessert products (German, 1999). The following definition makes the point that dairy products can provide a nutritional value beyond the basic nutritional requirements: 1) The dairy industry has the opportunity to improve the health and well-being of its customers and/or to reduce their risk of disease through dairy products with added activities. 2) Functional dairy products are those that can be demonstrated to benefit target functions in the body in a way that improves the state of health and /or reduces the risk of disease. They are food products that are consumed as part of a normal diet rather than pills or supplements. 3) Dairy products based on functionality will need to link the scientific basis of such functionality to the communication of its benefit to the general public. 4) Both the efficacy and the safety of the food components with health benefits will require evidence based on the measurement of scientific biomarkers relevant to their biological responses and health end points. 5) Sound evidence from human studies based on intermediate health end points using accepted biomarkers will provide the basis for promotional messages divided into two categories-enhanced function and reduced risk of disease. 6) Success in solving key scientific and technological challenges will only be achieved by interdisciplinary research programs to exploit the scientific concepts in functional dairy science.

Keywords

References

  1. Adams, C. A. 2010. The probiotic paradox: live and dead cells are biological response modifiers. Nutritional Research Review 23:37-46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422410000090
  2. Altuntas, E. G. 2013. Bacteriocins: A natural way to combat with pathogens. In A. Mendez-Vilas, (Eds.), Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: Science, technology and education (pp. 1005-1015). Formatex.
  3. Amalaradjou, M. A. and Venkitanarayanan, K. 2011. Effect of trans-cinnamaldehyde on inhibition and inactivation of Cronobacter sakazakii biofilm on abiotic surfaces. Journal of Food Protection 74:200-208. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-10-296
  4. Awaisheh, S. S., Al-Nabulsi, A. A., Osaili, T. M., Ibrahim, S. and Holley, R. 2013. Inhibition of Cronobacter sakazakii by heat labile bacteriocins produced by probiotic LAB isolated from healthy infants. Journal of Food Science 78:1416-1420. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12209
  5. Aymerich, T., Picouet, P. A. and Monfort, J. M. 2008. Decontamination technologies for meat products. Meat Science 78:114-129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.007
  6. Cencic, A. and Chingwaru, W. 2010. The role of functional foods, nutraceuticals and food supplements in intestinal health. Nutrients 611-625.
  7. Coconnier, M. H., Levin, V., Bernet-Camard, M. F., Hudault, S. and Servin, A. L. 1997. Antibacterial effect of the adhering human Lactobacillus acidophilus strain LB. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 41:1046-1052. https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.41.5.1046
  8. German, B., Schiffrin, E. J., Reniero, R., Mollet, B., Pfeifer, A. and Neeser, J. R. 1999. The development of functional foods: Lessons from the gut. Trends Biotechnol. 492-499.
  9. Hayes, M., Barrett, E., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G. F., Hill. C. and Stanton, C. 2009. Evaluation of an antimicrobial ingredient prepared from a Lactobacillus acidophilus casein fermentation against Enterobacter sakazakii. Journal of Food Protection 72:340-346. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.2.340
  10. Hor, Y. Y. and Liong, M. T. 2014. Use of extracellular extracts of lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacteria for the inhibition of dermatological pathogen Staphylococcus aureus. Dermatological Sinica 32:141-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsi.2014.03.001
  11. Huys, G., Botteldom, N., Delvigne, F., Vuyst, L. D., Heyndrickx, M., Pot, B. and Daube, G. 2013. Microbial characterization of probiotics-advisory report of the working group "8651 Probiotics" of the Belgian Superior Health Council (SHC). Molecular Nutritional Food Research 57:1479-1504. https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.201300065
  12. Iversen, C. and Forsythe, S. (2004). Risk profile of Enterobacter sakazakii, an emergent pathogen associated with infant formula. Trends in Food Science & Technology 14:443-454.
  13. Kataria, J., Li, N., Wynn, J. L. and Neu, J. 2009. Probiotic microbes: Do they need to be alive to be beneficial? Nutrition Reviews 67:546-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00226.x
  14. Kornacki, J. L. 2014. An environmental sampling approach to product risk assessment. Food Safety Magazine 2:14-19. https://doi.org/10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2014013s
  15. Mkrtchyan, H., Gibbons, S., Heidelberger, S., Zloh, M. and Limaki, K. H. 2010. Purification, characterisation and identification of acidocin LCHV, an antimicrobial peptide produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus n.v. Er 317/402 strain Narine. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 35:255-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.017
  16. Muytjens, H. I., Roelofs-Willemse, H. and Jaspar, G. H. 1988. Quality of powdered substitutes for breast milk with regard to members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Journal Clinical Microbiology 26:743-746.
  17. Sawalha, S. 2014. Functional food. Austin J. Nutri. Food Sci. 1022.
  18. Taverniti, V. and Guglielmetti, S. 2010. The immunomo dulatory properties of probiotic microorganisms beyond their viability (ghost probiotics: proposal of paraprobiotic concept). Nutrition Research Reviews 23:37-46.
  19. Taverniti, V. and Guglielmetti, S. 2011. The immunomodulatory properties of probiotic microorganisms beyond their viability (ghost probiotics: proposal of paraprobiotic concept). Genes Nutrition 6:261-274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x