대한족부족관절학회지 (Journal of Korean Foot and Ankle Society)

  • 제19권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-6
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1738-3757(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8551(eISSN)
대한족부족관절학회 (Korean Foot & Ankle Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

족관절의 인공관절 치환술

Total Ankle Replacement Arthroplasty

  • 성일훈 (한양대학교 의과대학 한양대학교병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김현욱 (한양대학교 의과대학 한양대학교병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Sung, Il Hoon (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Hyun Uk (Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hanyang University Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2014.11.24
  • 심사 : 2015.02.10
  • 발행 : 2015.03.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Total ankle replacement has been performed for treatment of end stage arthritis of the ankle, hopefully being an alternative to ankle arthrodesis. However, due to its high failure rates, earlier versions of ankle replacements were not regarded as successful procedures. The latest design has shown increasingly positive results. Total joint replacement of the ankle itself is still regarded as a demanding procedure and much more challenging than that of the hip and knee in many aspects. Several studies, however, have pointed out that it is becoming the viable, accepted alternative for arthrodesis with advanced implants, appropriate patient selection, and proper training experience of procedures. Compared with arthrodesis, it shows equal or better outcomes in pain relief, range of motion, and patient's satisfaction. We are attempting to review its biomechanical characteristics, implant design, indications, complications, clinical outcomes, and survival rate.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Gougoulias N, Maffulli N. History of total ankle replacement. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2013;30:1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2012.08.005
  2. Conti SF, Wong YS. Complications of total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;(391):105-14.
  3. Saltzman CL. Perspective on total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:761-75.
  4. Saltzman CL, Mann RA, Ahrens JE, Amendola A, Anderson RB, Berlet GC, et al. Prospective controlled trial of STAR total ankle replacement versus ankle fusion: initial results. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:579-96. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0579
  5. Barg A, Knupp M, Hintermann B. Simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral total ankle replacement: a patient-based comparison of pain relief, quality of life and functional outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:1659-63.
  6. Barg A, Elsner A, Chuckpaiwong B, Hintermann B. Insert position in three-component total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:754-9. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.0754
  7. Hintermann B, Barg A, Knupp M, Valderrabano V. Conversion of painful ankle arthrodesis to total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:850-8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00229
  8. Deland JT, Morris GD, Sung IH. Biomechanics of the ankle joint. A perspective on total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2000;5:747-59.
  9. Fukuda T, Haddad SL, Ren Y, Zhang LQ. Impact of talar component rotation on contact pressure after total ankle arthroplasty:a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31:404-11. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2010.0404
  10. Adams SB Jr, Spritzer CE, Hofstaetter SG, Jakoi AM, Pietrobon R, Nunley JA 2nd, et al. Computer-assisted tibia preparation for total ankle arthroplasty: a cadaveric study. Int J Med Robot. 2007;3:336-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.163
  11. van den Heuvel A, Van Bouwel S, Dereymaeker G. Total ankle replacement. Design evolution and results. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76:150-61.
  12. Glazebrook MA, Arsenault K, Dunbar M. Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:945-9. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0945
  13. Steck JK, Anderson JB. Total ankle arthroplasty: indications and avoiding complications. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2009;26:303-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpm.2009.02.001
  14. Karantana A, Hobson S, Dhar S. The scandinavian total ankle replacement: survivorship at 5 and 8 years comparable to other series. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:951-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0971-y
  15. Goldberg AJ, Sharp RJ, Cooke P. Ankle replacement: current practice of foot & ankle surgeons in the United kingdom. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:950-4. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0950
  16. Koivu H, Kohonen I, Sipola E, Alanen K, Vahlberg T, Tiusanen H. Severe periprosthetic osteolytic lesions after the Ankle Evolutive System total ankle replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91:907-14.
  17. Wood PL, Deakin S. Total ankle replacement. The results in 200ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85:334-41. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.85B3.13849
  18. Queen RM, Adams SB Jr, Viens NA, Friend JK, Easley ME, Deorio JK, et al. Differences in outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1927-34. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00404
  19. Lagaay PM, Schuberth JM. Analysis of ankle range of motion and functional outcome following total ankle arthoplasty. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:147-51. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2009.12.010
  20. Hsu AR, Anderson RB, Cohen BE. 5 points on total ankle arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014;43:451-7.
  21. Choi GW, Choi WJ, Lee JW. Total ankle replacement. J Korean Foot Ankle Soc. 2011;15:132-8.
  22. Canale ST, Beaty JH, Campbell WC. Campbell's operative orthopaedics. 12th ed. St. Louis, London: Mosby; 2012.
  23. Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Bohler N, Labek G. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1329-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.01.012
  24. Lee KT, Lee YK, Young KW, Kim JB, Seo YS. Perioperative complications and learning curve of the Mobility Total Ankle System. Foot Ankle Int. 2013;34:210-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100712467430
  25. Schimmel JJ, Walschot LH, Louwerens JW. Comparison of the short-term results of the first and last 50 Scandinavian total ankle replacements: assessment of the learning curve in a consecutive series. Foot Ankle Int. 2014;35:326-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713518187
  26. Besse JL, Brito N, Lienhart C. Clinical evaluation and radiographic assessment of bone lysis of the AES total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int. 2009;30:964-75. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2009.0964
  27. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1899-905. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.01149
  28. Coetzee JC, Deorio JK. Total ankle replacement systems available in the United States. Instr Course Lect. 2010;59:367-74.
  29. Wood PL, Karski MT, Watmough P. Total ankle replacement:the results of 100 mobility total ankle replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010;92:958-62. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00663
  30. Fevang BT, Lie SA, Havelin LI, Brun JG, Skredderstuen A, Furnes O. 257 ankle arthroplasties performed in Norway between 1994 and 2005. Acta Orthop. 2007;78:575-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710014257
  31. Labek G, Klaus H, Schlichtherle R, Williams A, Agreiter M. Revision rates after total ankle arthroplasty in sample-based clinical studies and national registries. Foot Ankle Int. 2011;32:740-5. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2011.0740
  32. Easley ME, Adams SB Jr, Hembree WC, DeOrio JK. Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1455-68. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.J.00126
  33. Gougoulias NE, Khanna A, Maffulli N. History and evolution in total ankle arthroplasty. Br Med Bull. 2009;89:111-51.
  34. Daniels TR, Younger AS, Penner M, Wing K, Dryden PJ, Wong H, et al. Intermediate-term results of total ankle replacement and ankle arthrodesis: a COFAS multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96:135-42. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01597
  35. Gougoulias N, Khanna A, Maffulli N. How successful are current ankle replacements?: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468:199-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0987-3
  36. Schuh R, Hofstaetter J, Krismer M, Bevoni R, Windhager R, Trnka HJ. Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis. Comparison of sports, recreational activities and functional outcome. Int Orthop. 2012;36:1207-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-011-1455-8
  37. Lee KB, Park YH, Song EK, Yoon TR, Jung KI. Static and dynamic postural balance after successful mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:519-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.017
  38. Singer S, Klejman S, Pinsker E, Houck J, Daniels T. Ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: gait analysis compared with normal controls. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:e191. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00603
  39. Chopra S, Rouhani H, Assal M, Aminian K, Crevoisier X. Outcome of unilateral ankle arthrodesis and total ankle replacement in terms of bilateral gait mechanics. J Orthop Res. 2014;32:377-84. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.22520
  40. Queen RM, Butler RJ, Adams SB Jr, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA. Bilateral differences in gait mechanics following total ankle replacement: a two year longitudinal study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2014;29:418-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.01.010