DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교수활동에서 테크놀로지 수용의도 영향 변인에 관한 연구

A Study of Factors Influencing Intention to use Technology in Teaching Activities

  • 주영주 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 정애경 (인천재능대학교 유아교육과) ;
  • 최미란 (이화여자대학교 교육공학과) ;
  • 이상회 (동서울대학 디지털전자과)
  • Joo, YoungJu (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Chung, AeKyung (Dept. of Early Childhood Education, JEI University) ;
  • Choi, Miran (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Yi, SangHoi (Dept. of Digital Electronics, Dong Seoul University)
  • 투고 : 2015.01.06
  • 심사 : 2015.03.03
  • 발행 : 2015.03.25

초록

본 연구의 목적은 교수활동에서 테크놀로지 수용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인을 규명하고, 이를 높이기 위한 구체적인 전략을 모색하는 데 있다. 본 연구에서는 TAM모형을 기반으로 TPACK, 테크노스트레스, 혁신성, 지각된 사용용이성, 지각된 유용성이 테크놀로지 수용의도에 영향을 미칠 것으로 가정하였다. 가설적 연구모형을 검증하기 위해 2014년도 2학기에 공통교직과목 "교육방법 및 교육공학"을 수강한 예비교사 254명을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였다. 구조방정식 모델링 분석을 통한 연구결과, TPACK은 테크노스트레스에 영향을 미쳤으며, 지각된 용이성은 지각된 유용성에 영향을 미치는 것으로 드러났다. 또한 TPACK, 테크노스트레스, 지각된 유용성은 테크놀로지 수용의도에 영향을 미쳤으나, 혁신성과 지각된 용이성은 수용의도에 영향을 미치지 못하였다. 위와 같은 연구결과는 TPACK, 테크노스트레스, 지각된 유용성이 교수활동에서의 테크놀로지 수용의도에 중요한 역할을 하는 변수임을 시사하였다. 이에 본 연구는 교수활동에서 테크놀로지 수용의도를 높이기 위한 방안을 마련하는데 있어 기초적인 토대를 제공하는데 기여할 것으로 기대된다.

The purpose of this study is to verify factors influencing attitude to use of technology in teaching activities. For this study, a hypothetical technology acceptance model(TAM) was composed of TPACK, technostress, innovation, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intention to use technology in teaching activities. The survey was administered to 254 pre-service teachers. The result of this study through structural equation modeling analysis is as follows: First, TPACK significantly affects technostress. second, perceived ease of use affects perceived usefulness. Third, TPACK, technostress, perceived usefulness affects behavioral intention to use, but innovation and perceived ease of use did not affect behavioral intention to use. These results imply that TPACK, technostress, perceived usefulness are important to enhance behavioral intention to use technology in teaching activities. This study propose the constructive foundation for providing strategies raising the behavioral intention to use of technology in teaching activities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Cuban, Kirkpatrick, and Peck, High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classroom: Explaining an Apparent Paradox, American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 813-834, 2001. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004813
  2. Pamuk, Understanding preservice teachers' technology use through TPACK framework, Compute Assisted Learning, Vol. 28, pp. 425-439, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00447.x
  3. M. R. Eom, W, S, Shin, and I, S, Han, A Survey on the Differences of Pre-service Teachers' Perception of the Technology, Pedagogy, and Content Knowledge (TPACK), Korean Teacher ducation, Vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 141-165, 2011.
  4. Al-Fudail, and Mellar, Investigating teacher stress when using technology, Computers & education, Vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 1103-1110, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.004
  5. Brod, C, Technostress: The human cost of the computer revolution, MA: Addison-Wesley, Vol. 13, p. 242, 1984.
  6. D'Ignazio, F., and Goth-Tew, S, Teacher explorers, pioneers, and settlers, The computing teacher, Vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 38-40, 1991.
  7. J. Y. Kim, Y. S. Kim, and N. R. Kim, The Effects of an Educational Computing Course on Preservice Teacher's Teaching Efficacy, Attitude and Anxiety Toward Computer, Asian Journal of ducation, Vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 101-119, 2003.
  8. Hohmann, C, Staff development practices for integrating technology in early childhood education programs. Young children: Active learners in a technological age, pp. 104, 1994.
  9. Koehler and Mishra, What is technological pedagogical content knowledge, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 9, o. 1, pp. 60-70, 2009.
  10. Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J, A conceptual and operational definition of personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information systems research, Vol. 9 no. 2, pp. 204-215, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.2.204
  11. Rogers, E. M. Diffusion of Innovation, New York: The Free Press, 1995.
  12. Davis, F. D., A User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models, Management science, Vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 982-1003, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
  13. K. J. Yoo and M. K. Kim, The development and application of a task based information, communication and technology literacy educational program for pre-service early childhood teachers, Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 365-401, 2012.
  14. liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y., Wible, D., and Kuo, C, Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Interation to use an Online Learning Community, Computers & Education, 54, pp. 600-610, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
  15. Molebash, P, Preservice teacher perceptions of a technology-enriched methods course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, Vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 412-432, 2004.
  16. Franklin, C. A., and Molebash, P. E, Technology in the elementary social studies classroom: Teacher preparation does matter. Theory & Research in Social Education, Vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 153-173, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2007.10473331
  17. M. J. Kim and H. S. Cheon, The Comparative Study of Attitude toward E-learning Adoption between Korean and Vietnamese College Students, The e-business studies, Vol. 15 , no. 1 , pp. 25-51, 2014.
  18. Aghamohammadi, A., Mohammadi, J., Parvaneh, N., Rezaei, N., Moin, M., Espanol, T., and Hammarstrom, L. , Progression of selective IgA deficiency to common variable immunodeficiency, International archives of allergy and immunology, Vol. 147, no. 2, pp. 87-92, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1159/000135694
  19. liu, Y., Li, H., and Carlsson, C, Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study, Computers & Education, pp. 1211-1219, 2010.
  20. S. H. Park and Y. J. Choi, The Study of Educational Mobile Application Usage Based on Technology Acceptance Model, Vol. -, no. 82, pp. 9-35, 2013.
  21. Fagan, M., Kilmon, C., and Pandey, V. (2012). Exploring the adoption of a virtual reality simulation: The role of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and personal innovativeness. Campus-Wide Information Systems, Vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 117-127, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741211212368
  22. M. S. Kang, C. H. Jung, and Y. S. Chung, An Empirical Study on the Factors Influencing the Acceptance of SmartWork, Daehan Academy of Management Information Systems, Vol. 32, no.1, pp. 19-41, 2013.
  23. K. S. Chung, M. J. Noh, and W. B. Lee, Factors Affecting the Continuous Use Intention of E-learning Site, Journal of Employment and Skills Development, Vol.11, No.3, pp. 237-261, 2008.
  24. Brown, S. A., Massey, A. P., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., and Burkman, J. R, Do I really have to? User acceptance of mandated technology, European journal of information systems, Vol. 11 no. 4, pp. 283-295, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000438
  25. Y. Joo, A. Chung, S. Yi, Y. Lee, "Prediction of academic self-efficacy, perceived usefulness and ease of use on flow and academic achievement in D college education." Journal of the Institute of Electronics and Information Engineers of Korea, Vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 59-67, 2010.
  26. Mathieson, K, Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior, Information systems research, Vol.2, no.3, pp. 173-191, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.173

피인용 문헌

  1. 예비교사 테크놀로지 활용 역량의 중요도와 실행도 분석 vol.20, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.6.597