한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제35권1호
  • /
  • Pages.1-14
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

앙부일구(仰釜日晷) 활동에서 드러난 탈북 학생들의 과학 학습

North Korean Defector Students' Science Learning in Angbuilgu Activity

  • 투고 : 2014.10.21
  • 심사 : 2015.01.22
  • 발행 : 2015.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구의 목적은 한국 전통 과학 소재인 앙부일구 과학 활동에서 나타나는 탈북 청소년들의 목소리를 통해 그들의 과학 학습 특성을 파악하는 것이다. 우리는 탈북 청소년들과 다른 교육적, 문화적 배경과 연령을 가진 다른 두 개 집단을 비교했다. 본 연구에 적용된 앙부일구 프로그램은 시간에 대한 의미 있는 질문, 일상생활 지식, 한국 전통 과학 지식, 서양 현대 과학 지식을 포함한다. 또 수업 과정은 교사와 학생 간 상호 작용과 실험 활동으로 이루어졌다. 이 프로그램은 탈북 청소년 집단, 초등 과학 우수아 집단, 고등 과학 심화 집단의 세 집단에 적용 후 분석되었다. 본 연구에서 드러난 탈북 청소년들의 과학 학습 특징은 다음과 같다. 첫째, 탈북 청소년들에게 시간의 의미는 생활속에 녹아 있는 자연 그 자체다. 그들은 자연의 시간에 익숙하고 생활 경험이 풍부하다. 둘째, 탈북 청소년은 보완적이고 배려하는, 그리고 인간의 다양한 측면을 고려하는 과학을 선호한다. 이는 새롭고 실용적인 과학을 선호하는 다른 집단들과는 대조적이다. 셋째, 탈북 학생들은 과학 개념 지식이 부족한 반면 일상생활 지식은 풍부하다. 이들의 언어적 표현도 과학적이기 보다는 일상적이다. 넷째, 탈북 학생들은 과학적 사고보다는 일상적 사고에 익숙하다. 이 결과를 통해 한국 전통 과학 소재의 과학 활동 프로그램이 탈북 학생들에게 새로운 과학 지식과 문화적 자긍심을 주고, 그들의 민족적 정체성을 확인할 수 있는 기회를 만드는 계기가 되었다. 한국의 전통 과학 소재는 탈북 학생과 우리 과학 교육 과정의 간문화적 장을 만들어 줄 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.

The purpose of this study is to examine North Korean defector students' characteristics in science learning through their voice in an "Angbuilgu" program, one of the Korean traditional science knowledge (TSK). We compared them with two other groups of contrasting backgrounds. The Angbuilgu program contains meaningful questions of time, everyday-life knowledge, Korean TSK, and western modern science (WMS). The teaching strategy consists of interactions between teacher and students, and scientific experiments. We applied this program to three groups and analyzed: North Korean defector students, elementary science gifted students, high school students in an advanced class. The characteristics of their science learning show the following: First, their interpretation of time as nature itself in their everyday life. They have rich experience and are familiar with time in nature. Second, they prefer science with complementary, caring, and humanist perspectives, which is in contrast to other groups with preference to the updated and practical science. Third, they lack scientific concepts but possess an abundance of everyday-life knowledge. Their linguistic expressions are ordinary rather than scientific. Fourth, they are familiar with narrative thinking more than scientific thinking. The results show that the science program using Korean TSK can help them accept new scientific knowledge as well as cultural pride, which plays a role in reconfirming their identity as one ethnicity. We expect that the contents of Korean TSK can be an intercultural field between North Korean defector students and our science curriculum.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). A cultural perspective on the structure of student interest in science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 51-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.518640
  2. Basu, S. J. (2008). How students design and enact physics lessons: Five immigrant caribbean youth and the cultivation of student voice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 881-899. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20257
  3. Boykin. W. (1986). The triple quandary and the schooling of Afro-American children. In U. Neisser (Ed.), The school achievement of minority children: New perspectives (pp.57 - 92). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  4. Cho, J. (2010). North Korean immigrants' learning experiences and reconstruction of identity. Unification Policy Studies, 19(2), 175-211.
  5. Cho, J. (2014). The experiences of crossing boundaries and identities of North Korean adolescent refugees. Review of North Korean Studies, 17(1), 101-155. https://doi.org/10.17321/rnks.2014.17.1.003
  6. Choi, D., & Cho, E. (2010). The formation and change of the national identity of university students that have defected from North Korea. North Korean studies review, 14(2), 215-240.
  7. Emdin, C. (2011). Dimensions of communication in urban science education: Interactions and transactions. Science Education, 95(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20411
  8. Gee, J. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor and Francis.
  9. Han, M., Yoon, J., Lee, H., & Kim, I. (2009). The current educational status of North Korean migrant children and the development of educational support systems in South Korea. Korean Educational Development Institute.
  10. Han, S. (2005). On the nature of inference and emotion in narrative and scientific contexts. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(2), 39-64.
  11. Hodson. D. (1999). Going beyond cultural pluralism: Science education for sociopolitical action. Science Education, 83(6), 775-796. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199911)83:6<775::AID-SCE8>3.0.CO;2-8
  12. Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., Paechter, M., Kubasko, D., Bokinsky, A., Andre, T., & Negishi, A. (2007). Differences in African-American and European-American students' engagement with nanotechnology experiences: Perceptual position or assessment artifact?. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 787-799. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20168
  13. Kim, A., (2013). Discussion paper: The science learning of multicultural family students. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 2013(3), 231-235.
  14. Kim, A., Shin, D., Kim, S., & Kim, M. (2012). Development and application of a science program for students with diverse needs : Focusing on a science program using the learning cycle model combined with reading strategies. Journal of Research in Curriculum Instruction, 16(4), 1253-1275.
  15. Kim, B., (2009). A study on educational program about the school adjustment of Sa-teo-min elementary school student. Masters thesis, Sungkonghoe University.
  16. Koh, S., Shin, D., & Kim, A. (2010). Some practice in math & science classes found by clinical interview with focus groups of North Korean students who live in South Korea. The Mathematical Education, 49(2), 125-148.
  17. Kurth, L. A., Anderson, C. W., & Palincsar, A. S. (2002). The case of Carla: Dilemmas of helping all students to understand science. Science Education, 86(3), 287-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10009
  18. Kwon, C., & Jang, M. (2004). A comparative study on the connection between elementary and secondary science contents of DPRK and Republic of Korea. Jour. Korean Earth Science Society, 25(7), 558-564.
  19. Lawrenz, F., Huffman, D., & Welch, W. (2001). The science achievement of various subgroups on alternative assessment formats. Science Education, 85(3), 279-290. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.1010
  20. Lee, B., (2012). Narrative inquiry on the learning experiences and identity reconstruction among North Korean young immigrants. The Korean Society for the Study of Anthropology of Education, 15(2), 23-57.
  21. Lee, S. (2008). The process of elaboration in pre-service science teachers' conception of scientific thinking. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 28(8), 937-954.
  22. Nam, H. (2013). The educational approach of North Korean Students as multiculturalism view. Korean Association for Learner-centered Curriculum and Instruction, 2013(3), 311-318.
  23. Noh, S., & Oh, P. (2013). North Korean immigrant elementary students' cognitive and affective characteristics related to science education. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 32(4), 495-502.
  24. Park, H., Noh, S., Oh, P., & Kim, J. (2014). Developing supplementary studies of K-9 science education contents for the North Korea defector students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(2), 363-381.
  25. Russell, M. L., & Atwater, M. M. (2005). Traveling the road to success: A discourse on persistence throughout the science pipeline with African American students at a predominantly white institution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(6), 691-715. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20068
  26. Simpson, J. S., & Parsons, E. C. (2009). African American perspectives and informal science educational experiences. Science Education, 93(2), 293-321. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20300

피인용 문헌

  1. 소외계층학생을 대상으로 한 과학교육 연구의 동향 분석 vol.37, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2017.37.6.921
  2. '모두를 위한 과학교육'을 실현하기 위한 과학 학습 정체성에 대한 사회문화적 접근 연구 동향 분석 vol.38, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2018.38.2.187
  3. Analysis of Learning Characteristics of North Korean Defector Students in Biology Class Using POE Model vol.46, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.4.586
  4. 소외 계층 학생들의 과학 학습 유형 vol.39, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2019.39.1.129